WO2003009168A1 - Tool for analysis of item attributes - Google Patents

Tool for analysis of item attributes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003009168A1
WO2003009168A1 PCT/US2001/022642 US0122642W WO03009168A1 WO 2003009168 A1 WO2003009168 A1 WO 2003009168A1 US 0122642 W US0122642 W US 0122642W WO 03009168 A1 WO03009168 A1 WO 03009168A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
attributes
report form
data set
report
data
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/022642
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Richard A. Marzan
Original Assignee
Innovative Fleet Management Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from PCT/US2001/000941 external-priority patent/WO2001052096A2/en
Application filed by Innovative Fleet Management Inc. filed Critical Innovative Fleet Management Inc.
Priority to US10/484,540 priority Critical patent/US20040194024A1/en
Publication of WO2003009168A1 publication Critical patent/WO2003009168A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/103Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for assessing
  • end user purchases an item directly and then after using the item for a period of time
  • the finance company makes a profit on a lease transaction
  • the end user is acting as the finance company, the
  • the end user desires to maximize the value of the item at the end of the period of use.
  • end of a lease term or the end of use by an end user is generally a market value which may be determined in a number of ways, including auction, wholesale, private party negotiated transactions, or multiparty transactions such as an
  • the auction location is a commercial vehicle auction, conveniently
  • the attendees would typically include entities which would resell the vehicle after purchase at the auction.
  • the value of the vehicle likely varies depending on the auction location, as certain attributes of vehicles are more desirable, hence more valuable, in certain
  • a simple, but illustrative example, is that light colored vehicles may be more popular — and more valuable — in warm weather locations which receive a lot of
  • a vehicle with greater fuel efficiency may have more value in areas in which gas prices are high. Conversely, a vehicle with low fuel efficiency may have more
  • the vehicle in a given area may change on a daily basis.
  • NADA Automobile Dealers Association
  • NADA publishes data broken down by nine geographic regions. Moreover, the
  • NADA lag time may range from two months to two weeks.
  • the NADA updates its written guide on a monthly basis (the lag time necessarily being greater than one
  • the NADA does make more frequently updated information available through its AuctionNet service, for which it charges $24,000 per year.
  • the data comes from the weekly electronic collection of 150,000 to 200,000 auction transactions, sent in from over 140
  • Information relating to valuation of vehicles may also be obtained from a
  • the present invention can be any valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can be any valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can be any valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can be any valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can be any valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can be any valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can be any valuation of similar items.
  • the present invention can also provide graphics that show the results of the
  • implementation of the present invention can be run on any web server, including a PC,
  • At least one presently preferred embodiment of the present invention broadly contemplates a method of displaying historical sales information for
  • said report form includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes; accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied; applying said report form to said data set; and displaying data from said data set in accordance with said report form.
  • invention broadly contemplates apparatus for displaying historical sales information
  • said apparatus comprising: an arrangement for formulating a
  • report form to be applied to a data set, wherein said report form includes at least one
  • At least one presently preferred embodiment of the present invention broadly contemplates a program storage device readable by machine, tangibly
  • said method comprising the steps of: formulating a report form to be applied to a data set, wherein
  • said report form includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes; accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied; applying said report form to said data set; and displaying said data in accordance with said report form.
  • Fig. 1 is a bar chart generated in accordance with the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a report generated in accordance with the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is another report generated in accordance with the present invention.
  • Fig. 4 shows the configuration of the screen used to generate the report shown
  • Fig. 5 is similar to Fig. 4, but shows the configuration of the search.
  • Fig. 6 is similar to Fig. 5, but shows the configuration of the method.
  • Fig. 7 is similar to Fig. 6, but shows the configuration of the charts.
  • a common issue in the disposition of items is the valuation of the item.
  • the present invention is intended to assist in the valuation of the item.
  • the present invention is intended to assist in the valuation of the item.
  • the present invention is intended to assist in the valuation of the item.
  • any vehicle characteristic may be
  • invention preferably has several reporting options: web based charts, web based
  • the link is a global communications network, such as the Internet.
  • the link can be a private communications network, or other appropriate means, such as a direct dial modem connection.
  • the link may also be a secure link, secured for example, through
  • a user will be using a common web browser, such as Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator.
  • Figure 1 is an example of a bar chart in accordance with the present invention.
  • ChartFx technology is used to generate the charts in a web based environment
  • Figure 2 is an example of a report.
  • a pre-configured report In this figure, a pre-configured report.
  • Crystal Report 8.0 be used to generate reports. This product provides users with an interface to view data results on the web and print the results to a local printer with all the standard page breaks and
  • Figure 3 is an example of the results page for a web based value search. In this
  • a value is suggested for a particular item.
  • the user selects a pre-configured
  • search criteria include the model year, the make, the model, the vehicle identification number (VIN), the region, the state, the condition, the mileage, the color, the source fleet, the unit, the interval of time to be searched,
  • search results are shown in report form. As shown, four sources of information were searched. The range of historical values is
  • One of the sources is preferably used as a
  • this suggested sale price is determined based on one hundred and two percent selected by the user, as is the data source to be used. A user may prefer, however, to
  • the arrangement of information as shown in this figure is preferable, as it presents information in a format that increases comprehension of the information.
  • Figures 4-7 are related to the configuration which produced the report as shown in Figure 3.
  • the various components which are preferably
  • configurable include the screen, the search, the method, and the charts.
  • Figure 4 shows the configuration of the screen.
  • certain criteria are specified, including the name of the report, the industry to which
  • Reference numeral 120 shows where the sources of information are selected and their attributes
  • information at reference numeral 80a is a system such as the one described in
  • the source of information at reference numeral 80b is from the owner of the items to be valued. Typically the owner of items has historical information on the items it has
  • the source of information at reference numeral 80c is the Automotive Market Report, a supplier of information similar to the NADA (discussed above), with
  • the source of information at reference numeral 80d is the AuctionNet service offered by the NADA,
  • NADA NADA and Black Book.
  • NADA is discussed above, and would be used in addition to AucNet data to include additional transactions not included in the AucNET data, such as dealer transactions.
  • Black Book data is provided by the
  • FIG. 5 shows the configuration of the search. At reference numeral 130, it is
  • Figure 3 shows a report with
  • fields to be searched by a user include year, vehicle identification number (VIN), engine size, make, exterior color, interior color, model, mileage, options, license
  • Figure 6 shows the configuration of the method used to generate the suggested
  • the method to be used is the average.
  • the price is calculated as adding the sale price associated with each transaction and dividing by the total number of transactions.
  • the calculated price is the arithmetic average of all sale prices within three standard deviations of the mean of all sale prices. Other appropriate methods may also be used.
  • the factor to be used is 3 Sigma.
  • suffix is preferably selected by the user when appropriate.
  • FIG. 7 shows the configuration of the charts which may be selected at
  • reference numeral 150 the preferred charts are daily high, weekly high, monthly
  • a daily high chart shows the
  • a weekly high chart shows the highest sale price in a day.
  • a monthly average chart shows the average sale price in a month, which is preferably a calendar month.
  • a seasonal average chart shows the average price for a defined season. Again the average price may be calculated using the methods discussed above, or by
  • a season may be any interval of time appropriate for item being evaluated.
  • a season is preferably a three month interval, with the seasons being as follows: November, December, January (Winter); February, March, April (Spring); May, June, July (Summer); and August, September, October (Fall).

Abstract

Processes and arrangements for assessing the value of an item in the remarketing market. Involved are the creation of a report form having screen (50), search (60), method (70), and chart attributes (100), facilitating access to a data set to which the report form is to be applied, applying said report form to said data set; and displaying said data in accordance with said report form. An illustrative example of an application of the contemplated processes and arrangements can be appreciated in connection with determining the value of a vehicle in the remarketing market.

Description

TOOL FOR ANALYSIS OF ITEM ATTRIBUTES
Technical Field
The present invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for assessing
the value of an item in the remarketing market, and in particular the value of a vehicle in the remarketing market.
Background Art
For a variety of reasons, the leasing of items — rather than the outright
purchase of items — is increasing by end users of the items. In a typical lease transaction, a finance company purchases the item and then leases (or rents) the use of the item to the end user for the term of lease. At the end of the lease term, a number
of things typically occur, including the end user relinquishing possession of the item
and the item being eventually being remarketed, or sold, by the finance company, which has always maintained title to the item. Also increasing is the practice were an
end user purchases an item directly and then after using the item for a period of time,
desires to remarket or sell the item. This senario is very similar to a lease, however,
the end user is acting as the finance company. These general processes apply to any
number of items, including but not limited to vehicles, both cars, trucks and buses;
heavy equipment such as lifts, cranes, and fork lifts; construction vehicles; computers; and office equipment. It should be understood the items enumerated herein are
intended to be exemplary and not limiting.
In its simplest form, the finance company makes a profit on a lease transaction
when the lease payments during the term of the lease and the value of the item leased
at the end of the lease term is greater than the purchase price of the item, including the time value of money. When the end user is acting as the finance company, the
objective is not per se to make a profit but rather to minimize the costs associated with use of the item. Thus, in this situation, the end user desires to maximize the value of the item at the end of the period of use. The value of an item at the end of a period of
use, whether the end of a lease term or the end of use by an end user, is generally a market value which may be determined in a number of ways, including auction, wholesale, private party negotiated transactions, or multiparty transactions such as an
auction. Further background will be now be described with reference to the auction of a leased vehicle, although it should be understood that similar activity occurs no
matter what item is actually used by the end user and how the market value is
determined.
Typically, the auction location is a commercial vehicle auction, conveniently
located to the location where the consumer surrenders possession of the vehicle. It
should be understood, however, that the auction location is selected by the finance
company (the owner of the vehicle), and is not necessarily the closest auction to the return location. It is then at the auction that the value of the vehicle is determined.
Potential end users of the vehicles being sold are generally not well represented at
such auctions. Rather, the attendees would typically include entities which would resell the vehicle after purchase at the auction.
The value of the vehicle likely varies depending on the auction location, as certain attributes of vehicles are more desirable, hence more valuable, in certain
locations. A simple, but illustrative example, is that light colored vehicles may be more popular — and more valuable — in warm weather locations which receive a lot of
sunshine. In the United States, such locations would be in states in the south and west of the country. Attributes other than color may also impact the value of a vehicle. For example, a vehicle with greater fuel efficiency may have more value in areas in which gas prices are high. Conversely, a vehicle with low fuel efficiency may have more
value in areas in which gas prices are low. In situations such as this one, the cost of gas may increase (or decrease) in a given area on a daily basis, and thus the value of
the vehicle in a given area may change on a daily basis.
There are several entities which gather valuation data from auctions. Two
such entities are Kelly Blue Book (see [http:]www.kbb.com) and the National
Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) (the NADA Blue Book) (see
[http:]www.nada.com). Sources such as these, however, have certain deficiencies
with the data they provide. For example, these sources do not break out the various options for vehicles in a manner which users of the information find to be most
helpful. Furthermore, there is a lag time before the reported information is available and the information may only be reported for certain geographic location. Indeed, the
NADA publishes data broken down by nine geographic regions. Moreover, the
NADA lag time may range from two months to two weeks. The NADA updates its written guide on a monthly basis (the lag time necessarily being greater than one
month, and due to technical constraints, more like two months). The cost for a yearly
subscription for this written guide is $55.00. The NADA does make more frequently updated information available through its AuctionNet service, for which it charges $24,000 per year. In the AuctionNet service, the data comes from the weekly electronic collection of 150,000 to 200,000 auction transactions, sent in from over 140
auctions throughout the United States. The data is only reported by nine geographic regions and includes the vehicle's VIN, make, model, mileage, sale type (i.e. dealer, manufacturer, fleet lease, repo and/or salvage), sale date, sale price and N.A.D.A.
region. The lag time for this data is approximately two weeks, given the need to
collate the data after collection.
Information relating to valuation of vehicles may also be obtained from a
system such as the one described in International Patent Application No.
PCT/USO 1/00941, entitled "System and Method for Remarketing Off Lease Items"
and filed on January 14, 2001, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Obtaining data from such a system would increase the currency of the data (data would be
available in real time) and increase the number of variables associated with the data.
In other words, the geographic association with the data would no longer be limited to
the nine regions of the United States as reported by NADA. Obtaining data from such a system, however, would not address the problem of displaying the data in a manner
which assists in valuing a particular item or vehicle.
Accordingly, a need has been recognized in connection with effectively
accessing and displaying information associated with a sale of an item to assist in the valuation of similar items.
Disclosure Of The Invention
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a greatly improved system and method for effectively aggregating one or many sources of data, accessing,
analyzing, and displaying information associated with a sale of an item to assist in the
valuation of similar items. As broadly contemplated herein, the present invention can
isolate the values associated with an item and do so through a variety of different
variables. The present invention can also provide graphics that show the results of the
analysis in ways that are simple to understand.
Although a presently contemplated application of the present invention and the
like is in the context of vehicles, the present invention may conceivably be utilized in other contexts, such as in connection with the valuation of any item for which the owner desires to maximize the item's sale price. A presently contemplated
implementation of the present invention may be written in visual basic. This
implementation of the present invention can be run on any web server, including a PC,
a UNIX machine, or a LINUX machine.
In summary, at least one presently preferred embodiment of the present invention broadly contemplates a method of displaying historical sales information for
an item from multiple sources to assist in the valuation relating to an attribute of at least one similar item, said method comprising the steps of: formulating a report form
to be applied to a data set, wherein said report form includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes; accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied; applying said report form to said data set; and displaying data from said data set in accordance with said report form.
Additionally, at least one presently preferred embodiment of the present
invention broadly contemplates apparatus for displaying historical sales information
for an item from multiple sources to assist in the valuation relating to an attribute of at
least one similar item, said apparatus comprising: an arrangement for formulating a
report form to be applied to a data set, wherein said report form includes at least one
of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes; an
arrangement for accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied; an arrangement for applying said report form to said data set; and an arrangement for
displaying said data in accordance with said report form.
Further, at least one presently preferred embodiment of the present invention broadly contemplates a program storage device readable by machine, tangibly
embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for displaying historical sales information from multiple sources for an item to
assist in the valuation relating to an attribute of at least one similar item, said method comprising the steps of: formulating a report form to be applied to a data set, wherein
said report form includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes; accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied; applying said report form to said data set; and displaying said data in accordance with said report form.
Other further and features and embodiments of the present invention will become apparent during the course of the following discussion and by reference to the
accompanying drawings.
Brief Description Of The Drawings
Fig. 1 is a bar chart generated in accordance with the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a report generated in accordance with the present invention. Fig. 3 is another report generated in accordance with the present invention.
Fig. 4 shows the configuration of the screen used to generate the report shown
in Fig. 3.
Fig. 5 is similar to Fig. 4, but shows the configuration of the search.
Fig. 6 is similar to Fig. 5, but shows the configuration of the method.
Fig. 7 is similar to Fig. 6, but shows the configuration of the charts.
Modes For Carrying Out The Invention
A common issue in the disposition of items is the valuation of the item. The present invention is intended to assist in the valuation of the item. Preferably, the
present invention includes a series of graphical displays to help the user visualize the results. In accordance with the present invention, any vehicle characteristic may be
dynamically tracked and the user is allowed to specify the calculation factors and summarization methods involved in analyzing the data collected. The present
invention preferably has several reporting options: web based charts, web based
reports, and web based value search, which are discussed herebelow. Results may
also be reported in electronic form to assist in further uses of the results.
It is contemplated in the present invention that a user who desires to analyze
certain data will be located remotely from the server on which the data is located and will be electronically linked to the server on which the data is located. The link does
not have to be a physical link - it can, for example, be a link via a global computer
network, such as the Internet, and include a virtual private network. Preferably, the link is a global communications network, such as the Internet. Use of a global
communications network reduces the cost of implementing the present invention since a private communications network need not be provided, while increasing the
geographic range of potential users. Alternatively, the link can be a private communications network, or other appropriate means, such as a direct dial modem connection. The link may also be a secure link, secured for example, through
cryptography. Preferably, a user will be using a common web browser, such as Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator.
Figure 1 is an example of a bar chart in accordance with the present invention.
In this figure, a pre-configured chart is selected at reference numeral 10. The results of the chart are then displayed at reference numeral 20. It is presently preferred that
that ChartFx technology is used to generate the charts in a web based environment,
(see [http:Jwww.chartfx.com) Using Chartfx technology, data may be displayed in
standard business charts such as bar charts, line charts, pie charts, and many others
with relative ease. Figure 2 is an example of a report. In this figure, a pre-configured
report is selected at reference numeral 30. The results of the report are then displayed
at reference numeral 40. It is presently preferred that Crystal Report 8.0 be used to generate reports. This product provides users with an interface to view data results on the web and print the results to a local printer with all the standard page breaks and
headers, (see [http://lwww.crystaldecisions.net/products/crystalreports/)
Figure 3 is an example of the results page for a web based value search. In this
report, a value is suggested for a particular item. The user selects a pre-configured
report at reference numeral 50. The user then enters certain search criteria at reference numeral 60. As shown, possible search criteria include the model year, the make, the model, the vehicle identification number (VIN), the region, the state, the condition, the mileage, the color, the source fleet, the unit, the interval of time to be searched,
and the country in which the vehicle is located. Additional searching criteria may also be used. At reference numeral 80 search results are shown in report form. As shown, four sources of information were searched. The range of historical values is
presented, along with the average. One of the sources is preferably used as a
benchmark and the results compared to that source are also presented. The fifty two week low and high are also shown. At reference numeral 90, the historical values are
presented in line chart form. The information to be displayed in chart form is selected
at reference numeral 100. As shown in Figure 3, the weekly high is shown for each
information source. At reference numeral 70, a suggested sale price is shown. As
shown, this suggested sale price is determined based on one hundred and two percent selected by the user, as is the data source to be used. A user may prefer, however, to
compute the suggested sale price in another manner based upon the user's own
experience. The arrangement of information as shown in this figure is preferable, as it presents information in a format that increases comprehension of the information.
One advantage of the present invention is that the display of information is configurable by the user. Figures 4-7 are related to the configuration which produced the report as shown in Figure 3. The various components which are preferably
configurable include the screen, the search, the method, and the charts.
Figure 4 shows the configuration of the screen. At reference numeral 110, certain criteria are specified, including the name of the report, the industry to which
the report applies, the group of users who may view the report (as shown it is a private report, viewable only by the creator), and the time period of interest. Reference numeral 120 shows where the sources of information are selected and their attributes
are chosen. These sources are denoted by reference numerals 80a, 80b, 80c, and 80d,
and their name may be selected, the source assigned, the value to be displayed chosen,
along with attributes of the value to be displayed. As shown, the source of
information at reference numeral 80a is a system such as the one described in
International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/00941, entitled "System and Method
for Remarketing Off Lease Items" and filed on January 14, 2001, discussed above.
The source of information at reference numeral 80b is from the owner of the items to be valued. Typically the owner of items has historical information on the items it has
previously sold; this is particularly true where the owner of the items is a finance
company. The source of information at reference numeral 80c is the Automotive Market Report, a supplier of information similar to the NADA (discussed above), with
an emphasis on information relating to the sale of fleet vehicles. The source of information at reference numeral 80d is the AuctionNet service offered by the NADA,
discussed above.
Other sources of information may also be used in addition to or as a replacement for any of the sources discussed above. Examples of other sources of
information include NADA and Black Book. NADA is discussed above, and would be used in addition to AucNet data to include additional transactions not included in the AucNET data, such as dealer transactions. Black Book data is provided by the
National Auto Research Division of the Hearst Business Media Corporation, which visually inspect vehicles and chronicles their selling price throughout North America
every week. There are, however, additional sources of information.
Figure 5 shows the configuration of the search. At reference numeral 130, it is
possible to select those fields which are searchable by a user of the report. As shown,
no fields are selected as being searchable. Figure 3, however, shows a report with
fields that have been selected as being searchable. As shown in Figure 5, the possible
fields to be searched by a user include year, vehicle identification number (VIN), engine size, make, exterior color, interior color, model, mileage, options, license
location, condition, region code, fleet, unit, and client name.
Figure 6 shows the configuration of the method used to generate the suggested
sale price, which appears in Figure 3. At reference numeral 140 the result is named (suggested sale price), the data source is selected, and the method used is also
selected. As shown, the method to be used is the average. In accordance with this method, the price is calculated as adding the sale price associated with each transaction and dividing by the total number of transactions. Another preferred
method is 3 Sigma. In accordance with the 3 Sigma method, the calculated price is the arithmetic average of all sale prices within three standard deviations of the mean of all sale prices. Other appropriate methods may also be used. The factor to be used
may also be entered. While the factor has not been selected in this figure, the factor used in Figure 3 is 102. A prefix and a suffice may also be entered. These items are
used for identifying characters which appear before and after the field or result to be displayed. While no prefix or suffix is shown in Fig. 6, an example of a prefix is the
dollar sign ("$") and an example of a suffix is the percent sign ("%"). A prefix and
suffix is preferably selected by the user when appropriate.
Figure 7 shows the configuration of the charts which may be selected at
reference numeral 100 in Figure 3. It should be noted that only those charts which
have previously been created are shown. Those charts which are shown are those that are presently preferred, although additional charts may be created. As shown at
reference numeral 150, the preferred charts are daily high, weekly high, monthly
average, seasonal average, and compare to other models. A daily high chart shows the
highest sale price in a day. A weekly high chart shows the highest sale price in a
week, which is preferably a calendar week. A monthly average chart shows the average sale price in a month, which is preferably a calendar month. The average
price may be calculated using the methods discussed above, or by any appropriate method. A seasonal average chart shows the average price for a defined season. Again the average price may be calculated using the methods discussed above, or by
any appropriate method. A season may be any interval of time appropriate for item being evaluated. For vehicles, a season is preferably a three month interval, with the seasons being as follows: November, December, January (Winter); February, March, April (Spring); May, June, July (Summer); and August, September, October (Fall). A
compare to other models chart shows the sale price of like or competitive vehicles.
An example of when this chart would be used is when a comparison of the same vehicle with different trim levels is desired. Figure 3 shows weekly high being
selected at reference numeral 100, with the information being displayed in line chart
form at reference numeral 90.
It is to be understood that the present invention may implemented on at least
one general-purpose computer running suitable software programs. These may also be implemented on at least one Integrated Circuit or part of at least one Integrated
Circuit. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both.
If not otherwise stated herein, it is to be assumed that all patents, patent
applications, patent publications and other publications (including web-based publications) mentioned and cited herein are hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in their entirety herein.
While there have been described what are believed to be the preferred embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will recognize that other and further modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention and it
is intended to claim all such changes and modifications as fully within the scope of the invention.

Claims

ClaimsWhat is claimed is:
1. A method of displaying historical sales information for an item from
multiple sources to assist in the valuation relating to an attribute of at least one similar
item, said method comprising the steps of:
formulating a report form to be applied to a data set, wherein said report form includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes;
accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied;
applying said report form to said data set; and
displaying data from said data set in accordance with said report form.
2. The method of Claim 1, wherein said report form comprises all of said
screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes.
3. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the report form is formulated
remotely from the data set.
4. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the report form comprises
screen attributes, the screen attributes comprising information relating to the source of
the data in the data set to be displayed.
5. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the report form comprises
search attributes, the search attributes comprising information relating to searchable fields within the data set.
6. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the report form comprises
method attributes, the method attributes comprising information relating to a method used to determine a given result displayed in the report.
7. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the report form comprises chart attributes, the chart attributes comprising information relating to charts which are
available for display in the report.
8. The method according to Claim 1, wherein said step of accessing a data set
to which the report form is to be applied comprises providing at least one security
arrangement associated with the data set.
9. The method according to Claim 8, wherein said step of providing at least
one security arrangement comprises providing an electronic cryptographic
arrangement associated with the data set.
10. An apparatus for displaying historical sales information for an item from
multiple sources to assist in the valuation relating to an attribute of at least one similar item, said apparatus comprising:
an arrangement for formulating a report form to be applied to a data set,
wherein said report form includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes;
an arrangement for accessing a data set to which the report form is to be
applied;
an arrangement for applying said report form to said data set; and
an arrangement for displaying said data in accordance with said report form.
11. The apparatus according to Claim 10, wherein said report form comprises
all of said screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and chart attributes.
12. The apparatus according to Claim 10, wherein the report form is
formulated remotely from the data set.
13. The apparatus according to Claim 10, wherein the report form comprises
screen attributes, the screen attributes comprising information relating to the source of
the data in the data set to be displayed.
14. The apparatus according to Claim 10, wherein the report form comprises
search attributes, the search attributes comprising information relating to searchable
fields within the data set.
15. The apparatus according to Claim 10, wherein the report form comprises method attributes, the method attributes comprising information relating to a method
used to determine a given result displayed in the report.
16. The apparatus to Claim 10, wherein the report form comprises chart attributes, the chart attributes comprising information relating to charts which are
available for display in the report.
17. The apparatus according to Claim 10, wherein said step of accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied comprises providing at least one security arrangement associated with the data set.
18. The apparatus according to Claim 17, wherein said step of providing at
least one security arrangement comprises providing an electronic cryptographic
arrangement associated with the data set.
19. A program storage device readable by machine for tangibly embodying a
program of instructions executable by said machine to perform a method of displaying
historical sales information from multiple sources for an item to assist in the valuation relating to an attribute of at least one similar item, said method comprising the steps
of:
formulating a report form to be applied to a data set, wherein said report form
includes at least one of: screen attributes, search attributes, method attributes, and
chart attributes;
accessing a data set to which the report form is to be applied;
applying said report form to said data set; and
displaying said data in accordance with said report form.
PCT/US2001/022642 2001-01-14 2001-07-18 Tool for analysis of item attributes WO2003009168A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/484,540 US20040194024A1 (en) 2001-07-18 2001-07-18 Tool for analysis of item attributes

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2001/000941 WO2001052096A2 (en) 2000-01-14 2001-01-14 System and method for remarketing off lease items

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003009168A1 true WO2003009168A1 (en) 2003-01-30

Family

ID=21742245

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/022647 WO2003009196A1 (en) 2001-01-14 2001-07-18 System and method for capturing conditions of items
PCT/US2001/022642 WO2003009168A1 (en) 2001-01-14 2001-07-18 Tool for analysis of item attributes

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/022647 WO2003009196A1 (en) 2001-01-14 2001-07-18 System and method for capturing conditions of items

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (2) WO2003009196A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103116152A (en) * 2013-01-31 2013-05-22 南京信息工程大学 Automatic identification method of weather radar base datum formats

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5546316A (en) * 1990-10-22 1996-08-13 Hallmark Cards, Incorporated Computer controlled system for vending personalized products
US5603025A (en) * 1994-07-29 1997-02-11 Borland International, Inc. Methods for hypertext reporting in a relational database management system
US5608643A (en) * 1994-09-01 1997-03-04 General Programming Holdings, Inc. System for managing multiple dispensing units and method of operation
US5664111A (en) * 1994-02-16 1997-09-02 Honicorp, Inc. Computerized, multimedia, network, real time, interactive marketing and transactional system
US6167378A (en) * 1997-01-21 2000-12-26 Webber, Jr.; Donald Gary Automated back office transaction method and system

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5774873A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-06-30 Adt Automotive, Inc. Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
US5862223A (en) * 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
US6041310A (en) * 1996-12-12 2000-03-21 Green Ford, Inc. Method and system for automobile transactions
US5978776A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-11-02 Seretti; Harry Vehicular data exchange system and method therefor

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5546316A (en) * 1990-10-22 1996-08-13 Hallmark Cards, Incorporated Computer controlled system for vending personalized products
US5664111A (en) * 1994-02-16 1997-09-02 Honicorp, Inc. Computerized, multimedia, network, real time, interactive marketing and transactional system
US5603025A (en) * 1994-07-29 1997-02-11 Borland International, Inc. Methods for hypertext reporting in a relational database management system
US5608643A (en) * 1994-09-01 1997-03-04 General Programming Holdings, Inc. System for managing multiple dispensing units and method of operation
US6167378A (en) * 1997-01-21 2000-12-26 Webber, Jr.; Donald Gary Automated back office transaction method and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2003009196A1 (en) 2003-01-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Fraumeni E-commerce: Measurement and measurement issues
US8200553B1 (en) System and method for tracking charitable deductions
US7778841B1 (en) System and method for generating information relating to histories for a plurality of vehicles
US6622131B1 (en) Method and system for auctioning loans through a computing system
US7454355B2 (en) Method and system for providing real estate information using a computer network, such as the internet
US8495487B2 (en) Web-based dealership management system
US10380654B2 (en) System and method for providing a score for a used vehicle
US9697544B1 (en) System and method for generating information relating to a vehicle's history
US20110270706A1 (en) Vehicle value analysis
US20140081762A1 (en) Method, system, and software for geographically focused network advertising
US20020024537A1 (en) E2 automobile dealership information management system
US20010049653A1 (en) System for matching customers with products in inventory
US20030130966A1 (en) Vehicle management, appraisal and auction system
US20020133410A1 (en) System and method of preparing an income tax return
US8200574B2 (en) Financing information processing system and method
CN101589385A (en) A choice engine
JP2004530226A5 (en)
US20040143516A1 (en) System for allowing vendors to manage product information in a database system
US20120254003A1 (en) Automated System and Method for Providing Lease Payment Information to Consumers via the Internet
CN106874321B (en) Pluggable data retrieval method and device
US20030023511A1 (en) Automated system and method for tracking online activity to initiating information source
EP1128287A2 (en) Indexation system for electronic addresses
JP2002149774A (en) Gathering and retrieval system for vehicle history information
US20030117443A1 (en) Network based business diagnostic and credit evaluation method and system
US20040194024A1 (en) Tool for analysis of item attributes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10484540

Country of ref document: US

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: COMMUNICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 69 EPC

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP