US20100023438A1 - System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base - Google Patents
System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100023438A1 US20100023438A1 US11/463,437 US46343706A US2010023438A1 US 20100023438 A1 US20100023438 A1 US 20100023438A1 US 46343706 A US46343706 A US 46343706A US 2010023438 A1 US2010023438 A1 US 2010023438A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- deposit
- base
- liabilities base
- deposit liabilities
- financial institution
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a system and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for selling bank deposits at a predetermined price.
- Maintaining access to capital financing is a primary responsibility of bank management. Financial institutions that can best guarantee access to equity are often best positioned to weather industry cycles and take advantage of new opportunities that require capital investment. Unfortunately, the traditional method of attracting outside equity investment—selling common equity securities—is not suitable for contingency planning. There is normally little chance of reliably securing financing commitments in anticipation of a future unspecified need. Consequently, timing issues make raising equity only when it is needed an uncertain and costly process.
- investors use these techniques to search for profit opportunities that are not immediately evident from a superficial reading of a bank's financial statements.
- Potential opportunities can be identified in the differences between historically determined, conservatively stated book values and estimated current market values. For instance, assets that were acquired previously (and valued when acquired) might now have substantially higher current values that are not recognized on financial statements.
- Management and consultants use more complex valuation procedures to determine the costs and profitability of individual lines of business and individual customer relationships. Investors, management and regulators also apply estimating techniques for risk analysis purposes. For instance, by accurately accounting for the pricing and timing differences between assets and liabilities, observers can forecast an institution's exposure to fluctuations in the external interest rate environment.
- valuation techniques are used in transaction-specific circumstances, such as to account for changes brought by merger and acquisition activity. These valuation techniques will now be briefly discussed.
- GAP Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP), mergers and acquisitions have traditionally been accounted for in one of two ways. Transactions in which sellers receive compensation only in the form of common stock of the buyer may currently be accounted for as “pooling-of-interest” transactions. Accounting for pooling transactions is simply a matter of aggregating the existing book values of the separate financial statements into a newly merged single set of statements.
- Valuation methodology would then be applied to Bank B's loan portfolio.
- Obtaining accurate values for the banks loan portfolio may be more difficult than ascertaining current market values of real estate or investments as outlined above.
- Individual loans cannot be as accurately priced as individual high-quality bonds. Instead, the loans are likely to be analyzed using portfolio estimating techniques to measure pricing, risk and random effects.
- ambiguity in valuing balance sheet items renders purchase accounting an inexact process.
- tangible purchase accounting adjustments are limited to the assets with the most clearly justifiable estimated market values. Once these adjustments are made, any remaining unallocated portion of a purchase premium is assigned to intangible adjustments, such as goodwill, which are not as easily quantified.
- intangible assets are less certain than those of tangible assets
- regulators discount intangible assets when evaluating financial institutions for capital adequacy purposes.
- the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) requires that the intangible portion of a purchase premium must be deducted from the acquiring bank holding company's proforma consolidated capital.
- FRB Federal Reserve Board
- intangible adjustments make it difficult for banks to engage in purchase accounting transactions versus pooling of interest transactions.
- Goodwill is an intangible asset category. It is used as a plug figure when all other adjustments have been made, but goodwill, as a concept, is technically no more than an attempt to quantify the impossible to accurately measure value found in established selling businesses due to factors like their reputations or brand identities. Yet these factors are often not why buyers pay large premiums for selling banks. Selling banks may have created some intangible market value attributable to such factors, but a greater value is often placed on their ability to borrow money cheaply.
- Quantitative analysis methods can be used to demonstrate the potential fair values of core deposits, but it is believed that modifying and extending them to incorporate the steps necessary to create a mechanism to contractually establish their actual market values has never been done.
- Deposit liabilities base means part or all of the deposit gathering function of a financial institution, including existing funds of individuals, partnerships, corporations and public entities on deposit, as well as the function's prospective capabilities (if any) to attract similar funds with benefits such as federal deposit insurance or convenient access to the payment system.
- Financial institution means firms such as bank holding companies, and FDIC-insured commercial banks and thrifts engaged, to at least some degree, in interest margin-generating financial intermediation activities.
- the present invention is a system and method for analyzing and originating a deposit liability option contract (DLOC) wherein a third party (the “writer”) agrees to offer a financial institution (the “purchaser”) the right for a period of time to sell a fixed dollar amount of deposit liabilities to the writer at a predetermined price.
- the invention employs a computer system to generate output regarding the subject deposits, which is then incorporated in contractual documents that specify the price the writer will pay during a predetermined term for the subject deposits (along with a corresponding amount of eligible assets at fair market value), which may be dependent on the exercise of a “put” at the option of the purchaser.
- external market data or estimates thereof, relating to deposit pricing practices, branch divestitures and other pertinent factors are input to the computer system.
- Internal data relating to the subject deposit base is also input to the computer system.
- One or more valuation analyses are performed on the subject deposit base, incorporating the external and/or internal data, to determine an estimated market value or range of such values.
- a minimum potential bid price, or range of such prices, is then generated and incorporated into the contract documents.
- a method for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a financial institution or purchaser and for originating contractual documents through which the purchaser obtains the right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a third party or writer at a predetermined price.
- External market data, and internal data pertaining to the purchaser is analyzed and input to a computer system.
- An estimated market value or a range of such values is then calculated for the deposit liabilities base.
- a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices is generated for the deposit liabilities base.
- These generated prices are then incorporated into the contractual documents, which specify the price or range of prices which the writer will pay during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities base.
- the purchaser exercises its right as specified in the contractual documents to sell the deposit liabilities base to the writer.
- the external market data may include data relating to deposit pricing practices, and the internal data may relate to the deposit liabilities base of the selling purchaser.
- the deposit liabilities base may include either or both of non-interest bearing and interest bearing deposit accounts.
- the method of the present invention may also incorporate one or more of its steps into a purchase accounting acquisition of a selling financial institution.
- the method may also include the step of calculating the deposit liabilities base by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds.
- a method using a computer system is employed for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a purchaser.
- the purchaser seeks to obtain the right to substitute other deposit funds not originally included in the subject deposit liabilities base.
- Contractual documents are originated through which the purchaser obtains the right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a writer at a predetermined price.
- external market data, and internal data pertaining to the purchaser is analyzed and input to the computer system.
- an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base is calculated, and minimum potential bid price(s) are generated. These bid price(s) are incorporated into the contractual documents, which specify the price or range of prices which will be paid during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities.
- the minimum bid may cover both existing and new deposit relationships, and allocate the value of the bid between existing and new.
- the deposit liability contract owner may experience an unanticipated decline in the balances held by originally existing depositors and/or an unanticipated increase in new deposit generation.
- the contract owner may claim a recovery from the counterparty for the decline in value from originally existing depositors in exchange for a reduced value for the remaining new depositors.
- the original deposit liability contract could contemplate this, or the parties could simply negotiate this after execution of the original contract.
- a financial institution/purchaser may seek permission from the third party/writer to include newly attracted funds in the deposit liabilities base based upon an adjustment to the value of the deposit liabilities base, calculated by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base based on existing funds from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds. Then, an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base may be calculated, based at least in part on the analyzed external market data and internal data, as well as this adjustment.
- a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices for the deposit liabilities base may be generated, based at least in part on the estimated market value(s), and this may be incorporated into new contractual documents which specify the price or range of prices which the third party will pay during a predetermined time for the deposit liabilities base.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating a preferred embodiment of a system and method for originating a deposit liability option contract according to the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing, for one specific example discussed below, an unanticipated attrition of existing relationships.
- Bank A buys Bank B for $20 million.
- Bank B has book values according to GAAP as follows:
- various internal data relating to the subject deposit base to be transacted may be input to the computer system.
- this internal data may include the following internal deposit base characteristics:
- the computer system analyzes the internal and external data as explained here to generate outputs regarding the subject deposit liabilities base. These outputs are then incorporated in contractual documents that specify the price the writer will pay during a predetermined term for the subject deposit liabilities base (accompanied by a corresponding amount of assets at their own fair market value).
- these outputs may include:
- FIG. 1 illustrates one preferred embodiment of a system and method, embodying Steps 1 - 10 , for originating a deposit liability option contract according to the present invention.
- Steps 1 - 10 for originating a deposit liability option contract according to the present invention.
- the financial institution seeks permission from the third party to adjust the value of the deposit liabilities base, given (for example) an unanticipated attrition in existing deposits and/or an unanticipated increase in the value of newly attracted funds.
- This permission may be embodied in the original DLOC contract, or may be negotiated after its execution at some later date.
- the DLOC owner might be enabled to claim a recovery from the counterparty for the decline in value of originally existing depositors in exchange for a reduced value for the remaining new deposits. Referring also to FIG. 2 , here is a specific example:
Abstract
A system and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for transacting a deposit liabilities base of a financial institution at predetermined prices and time periods. The arrangement may be adjusted due to attrition in the existing deposit base and/or an increase in newly attracted funds.
Description
- The present invention relates to a system and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for selling bank deposits at a predetermined price.
- Maintaining access to capital financing is a primary responsibility of bank management. Financial institutions that can best guarantee access to equity are often best positioned to weather industry cycles and take advantage of new opportunities that require capital investment. Unfortunately, the traditional method of attracting outside equity investment—selling common equity securities—is not suitable for contingency planning. There is normally little chance of reliably securing financing commitments in anticipation of a future unspecified need. Consequently, timing issues make raising equity only when it is needed an uncertain and costly process.
- Associated with maintaining access to financing sources is management's role in effectively communicating the institution's true fundamental value to the investment community. Success in doing so relies in large part on the details of the institution's financial condition. Analyzing those details and valuing the different components of an institution's financial condition is a complex undertaking that often yields imprecise results. Nevertheless, a wide variety of market and regulatory participants have critical needs for such information. Long-standing procedures for quantifying values of different balance sheet components are continually employed by investors, accounting firms, bank regulators, and consultants in a variety of different manners.
- In their simplest form, investors use these techniques to search for profit opportunities that are not immediately evident from a superficial reading of a bank's financial statements. Potential opportunities can be identified in the differences between historically determined, conservatively stated book values and estimated current market values. For instance, assets that were acquired previously (and valued when acquired) might now have substantially higher current values that are not recognized on financial statements.
- Management and consultants use more complex valuation procedures to determine the costs and profitability of individual lines of business and individual customer relationships. Investors, management and regulators also apply estimating techniques for risk analysis purposes. For instance, by accurately accounting for the pricing and timing differences between assets and liabilities, observers can forecast an institution's exposure to fluctuations in the external interest rate environment.
- Apart from analyzing ongoing businesses, valuation techniques are used in transaction-specific circumstances, such as to account for changes brought by merger and acquisition activity. These valuation techniques will now be briefly discussed.
- Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP), mergers and acquisitions have traditionally been accounted for in one of two ways. Transactions in which sellers receive compensation only in the form of common stock of the buyer may currently be accounted for as “pooling-of-interest” transactions. Accounting for pooling transactions is simply a matter of aggregating the existing book values of the separate financial statements into a newly merged single set of statements.
- Acquisitions in which sellers receive compensation, in part or in whole, other than in the form of the buyer's common shares are treated as “purchase accounting” transactions. Acquisitions structured as purchase transactions require that the selling company's financial statements be re-valued as of the transaction date (a practice often labeled “marking-to-market”). Unlike pooling of interest accounting, purchase accounting requires that the purchase premium over book value be allocated to different parts of the seller's balance sheet.
- The philosophy behind this purchase accounting practice is to quantify the reasons why a buyer paid a particular purchase price. By re-valuing various balance sheet elements (primarily assets) as if they were to be liquidated at their current values, purchase accounting can accurately allocate portions of the purchase premium to specific assets. For instance, assume that Bank A buys Bank B for $20 million in cash. Assume further that, prior to closing, Bank B has been valued according to GAAP as follows:
-
Total Assets $100 million Cash $3 million Investments $30 million Loans $62 million Premises $1 million Other $4 million -
Total Liabilities $92 million Checking $15 million Savings $25 million NOW $10 million Money Market $10 million Cert. of Deposit $30 million Other $2 million -
Total Equity $8 million Preferred — Common $1 million Paid-in $1 million Retained $6 million
On the sale date, the buyer's auditors will mark-to-market Bank B's balance sheet, and allocate the $12 million purchase premium ($20 million purchase price minus equity book value of $8 million) to the differences between market and book among the various assets. Normally the first step in the allocation process is to identify “tangible purchase adjustments”, or differences between market and book value for assets with established (and therefore “tangible”) market values. For instance, an appraisal of the seller's premises would be ordered. If Bank B's premises are relatively old, Bank B may have depreciated the initial cost of the property to a point well below its current market value. GAAP would require that Bank B's premises account be restated to reflect the difference. Therefore, a $1 million write-up in the value of Bank B's building would account for $1 million of the $12 million purchase premium. - Next, the bonds in Bank B's investment portfolio, which normally are all high quality, marketable securities, will be priced. Due to changes in rates and other factors, these investments individually may be worth more, or less, than their original purchase price. If, in the aggregate, they are worth more, under GAAP the accountants will restate Bank B's investments upward, reflecting the appreciation and simultaneously reducing the unallocated portion of the purchase premium.
- Valuation methodology would then be applied to Bank B's loan portfolio. Obtaining accurate values for the banks loan portfolio may be more difficult than ascertaining current market values of real estate or investments as outlined above. Individual loans cannot be as accurately priced as individual high-quality bonds. Instead, the loans are likely to be analyzed using portfolio estimating techniques to measure pricing, risk and random effects. As can be seen, ambiguity in valuing balance sheet items renders purchase accounting an inexact process. Generally, tangible purchase accounting adjustments are limited to the assets with the most clearly justifiable estimated market values. Once these adjustments are made, any remaining unallocated portion of a purchase premium is assigned to intangible adjustments, such as goodwill, which are not as easily quantified.
- Because values of intangible assets are less certain than those of tangible assets, regulators discount intangible assets when evaluating financial institutions for capital adequacy purposes. Specifically, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) requires that the intangible portion of a purchase premium must be deducted from the acquiring bank holding company's proforma consolidated capital. From a regulatory perspective, intangible adjustments make it difficult for banks to engage in purchase accounting transactions versus pooling of interest transactions. Goodwill is an intangible asset category. It is used as a plug figure when all other adjustments have been made, but goodwill, as a concept, is technically no more than an attempt to quantify the impossible to accurately measure value found in established selling businesses due to factors like their reputations or brand identities. Yet these factors are often not why buyers pay large premiums for selling banks. Selling banks may have created some intangible market value attributable to such factors, but a greater value is often placed on their ability to borrow money cheaply.
- Just as there is value in lending money at higher than market rates, there is value in borrowing money at lower than market rates. Financial institutions generate liability funding cost savings by attracting core deposits with their convenient access to the payment system and FDIC deposit insurance. This reality is partially incorporated in a less frequently applied purchase accounting adjustment—the core deposit intangible. This adjustment is, obviously, just as intangible as goodwill. Although it may be a more accurate representation of the rationale behind the purchase premium, it is deducted just the same from proforma regulatory capital. Buyers, therefore, frequently do not take the time to allocate their excess purchase premiums in this manner.
- This intangible treatment rests on the determination that bank liability bases have values that are too ambiguous to measure for accounting purposes. While this may be the case for accounting purposes, it is likely not the case for investment purposes. Third party market participants, given the opportunity to obtain low cost deposit bases, normally pay more than book value for them. The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) helped defray the costs of the Savings & Loan crisis of the 1980's by auctioning the deposit bases of failed thrifts at a profit. Commercial bank deposit bases, some of which are spun-off every year by acquirers divesting for antitrust purposes, are often considered even more valuable due to the presence of a larger number of non-interest bearing demand deposits.
- Quantitative analysis methods can be used to demonstrate the potential fair values of core deposits, but it is believed that modifying and extending them to incorporate the steps necessary to create a mechanism to contractually establish their actual market values has never been done.
- The benefits of providing a contingency mechanism for buying and selling core deposit bases would be numerous. A new market in which third parties are contractually obligated to pay pre-established fixed prices for a certain dollar amount of deposits would be an additional method for bank holding companies to obtain advance commitments to raise tangible equity capital. Financial institutions could better justify their intrinsic values to the capital markets, thus facilitating better access to financing sources. Sellers could more reliably obtain market prices without burdening themselves with the credit and liquidity risks brought about in pooling transactions. Equity capital would be more efficiently employed without the potential dangers of enabling acquirers to speculate on unreliable future values with leveraged financing. Management, employees, regulators and other industry participants would be more clearly informed about the rationale behind merger and acquisition activity, as well as the fundamental value of financial institutions in general.
- The following terms are used in the claims of the patent as filed and are intended to have their broadest meaning consistent with the requirements of law.
- “Deposit liabilities base” means part or all of the deposit gathering function of a financial institution, including existing funds of individuals, partnerships, corporations and public entities on deposit, as well as the function's prospective capabilities (if any) to attract similar funds with benefits such as federal deposit insurance or convenient access to the payment system.
- “Financial institution” means firms such as bank holding companies, and FDIC-insured commercial banks and thrifts engaged, to at least some degree, in interest margin-generating financial intermediation activities.
- These and other objects are provided by the present invention, which preserves the advantages of known methods for valuing intangible assets of banks, while overcoming disadvantages associated with such methods, and also providing new advantages not previously realized which permit the creation of a market for such assets.
- The present invention is a system and method for analyzing and originating a deposit liability option contract (DLOC) wherein a third party (the “writer”) agrees to offer a financial institution (the “purchaser”) the right for a period of time to sell a fixed dollar amount of deposit liabilities to the writer at a predetermined price. The invention employs a computer system to generate output regarding the subject deposits, which is then incorporated in contractual documents that specify the price the writer will pay during a predetermined term for the subject deposits (along with a corresponding amount of eligible assets at fair market value), which may be dependent on the exercise of a “put” at the option of the purchaser.
- In the practice of the invention, external market data, or estimates thereof, relating to deposit pricing practices, branch divestitures and other pertinent factors are input to the computer system. Internal data relating to the subject deposit base is also input to the computer system. One or more valuation analyses are performed on the subject deposit base, incorporating the external and/or internal data, to determine an estimated market value or range of such values. A minimum potential bid price, or range of such prices, is then generated and incorporated into the contract documents.
- In one preferred embodiment of the invention, a method is employed for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a financial institution or purchaser and for originating contractual documents through which the purchaser obtains the right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a third party or writer at a predetermined price. External market data, and internal data pertaining to the purchaser is analyzed and input to a computer system. An estimated market value or a range of such values is then calculated for the deposit liabilities base. Next, a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices is generated for the deposit liabilities base. These generated prices are then incorporated into the contractual documents, which specify the price or range of prices which the writer will pay during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities base.
- In a preferred embodiment, the purchaser exercises its right as specified in the contractual documents to sell the deposit liabilities base to the writer. In an alternative embodiment, the external market data may include data relating to deposit pricing practices, and the internal data may relate to the deposit liabilities base of the selling purchaser.
- In alternative preferred embodiments, the deposit liabilities base may include either or both of non-interest bearing and interest bearing deposit accounts. The method of the present invention may also incorporate one or more of its steps into a purchase accounting acquisition of a selling financial institution. The method may also include the step of calculating the deposit liabilities base by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds.
- In an alternative preferred embodiment, a method using a computer system is employed for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a purchaser. In this embodiment, the purchaser seeks to obtain the right to substitute other deposit funds not originally included in the subject deposit liabilities base. Contractual documents are originated through which the purchaser obtains the right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a writer at a predetermined price. First, external market data, and internal data pertaining to the purchaser, is analyzed and input to the computer system. Next, an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base is calculated, and minimum potential bid price(s) are generated. These bid price(s) are incorporated into the contractual documents, which specify the price or range of prices which will be paid during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities.
- In yet another alternative embodiment, the minimum bid may cover both existing and new deposit relationships, and allocate the value of the bid between existing and new. For example, at some point in time after the deposit liability contract is executed, the deposit liability contract owner may experience an unanticipated decline in the balances held by originally existing depositors and/or an unanticipated increase in new deposit generation. In either or both cases, the contract owner may claim a recovery from the counterparty for the decline in value from originally existing depositors in exchange for a reduced value for the remaining new depositors. The original deposit liability contract could contemplate this, or the parties could simply negotiate this after execution of the original contract.
- Thus, for example, after original contract execution concerning a deposit liabilities base, a financial institution/purchaser may seek permission from the third party/writer to include newly attracted funds in the deposit liabilities base based upon an adjustment to the value of the deposit liabilities base, calculated by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base based on existing funds from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds. Then, an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base may be calculated, based at least in part on the analyzed external market data and internal data, as well as this adjustment. Now, a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices for the deposit liabilities base may be generated, based at least in part on the estimated market value(s), and this may be incorporated into new contractual documents which specify the price or range of prices which the third party will pay during a predetermined time for the deposit liabilities base. This again allows the value of the deposit liabilities base to be quantified with sufficient certainty so that it may be treated as tangible capital for regulatory and investments purposes, while permitting the deposit liabilities base to be sold if desired, but not requiring divestiture of the deposit liabilities base from the financial institution.
- The novel features which are characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, together with further objects and attendant advantages thereof, will be best understood by reference to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating a preferred embodiment of a system and method for originating a deposit liability option contract according to the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a graph showing, for one specific example discussed below, an unanticipated attrition of existing relationships. - An explanation of a preferred embodiment of the system and method for implementing a plan to conditionally sell deposit liabilities will now be provided by way of a specific example.
- Suppose that in a purchase accounting transaction, Bank A buys Bank B for $20 million. Suppose also that Bank B has book values according to GAAP as follows:
-
Total Assets $100 million Cash $3 million Investments $30 million Loans $62 million Premises $1 million Other $4 million -
Total Liabilities $92 million Checking $15 million Savings $25 million NOW $10 million Money Market $10 million Cert. of Deposit $30 million Other $2 million -
Total Equity $8 million Preferred — Common $1 million Paid-in $1 million Retained $6 million - According to the invention, various internal data relating to the subject deposit base to be transacted may be input to the computer system. By way of example, this internal data may include the following internal deposit base characteristics:
-
- A. Internal Data
- 1. deposit volume
- a. by category, e.g., demand; NOW; IMMA; savings; time
- b. in the aggregate
- 2. weighted average cost
- c. by category, e.g., demand; NOW; IMMA; savings; time
- d. in the aggregate
- 3. estimated overhead, or other non-interest, costs attributed to deposit services
- e. Fed Functional Cost Analysis/other data
- f. reserve requirement opportunity costs
- g. other opportunity costs
- h. other
- 4. estimated changes in future volume
- i. annual attrition of existing relationships
- i. duration to date
- ii. depositor age
- iii. other
- j. annual retention/expansion/attraction of existing and new relationships
- i. historical experience
- 1. deposit volume
- B. External factors—also according to the invention, external market data relating to deposit pricing practices, branch divestitures and other pertinent transactions is input to the computer system. By way of example, this external data may include the following:
- 1. Local, regional and national peer deposit pricing and historical growth data
- 2. comparable market sales data (e.g., numbers of and/or prices paid in spin-offs, divestitures, liquidations)
- 3. replacement costs
- a. retail replacement
- b. wholesale funding markets (e.g., Federal Home Loan Bank, Fed funds market, discount window)
- 4. industry trends
- 5. general economic conditions
- 6. current credit rates (e.g., U.S. Treasury, Agency, municipal and corporate debt rates)
- 7. rate forecasts
- A. Internal Data
- According to the invention, the computer system analyzes the internal and external data as explained here to generate outputs regarding the subject deposit liabilities base. These outputs are then incorporated in contractual documents that specify the price the writer will pay during a predetermined term for the subject deposit liabilities base (accompanied by a corresponding amount of assets at their own fair market value). By way of example, and referring also to the attached Appendix, these outputs may include:
-
- A. Comparison outputs, including:
- 1. local, regional, national peer rankings of the subject deposit liabilities base versus similar bases
- a. by pricing within deposit category
- b. by mix
- c. by estimated overhead cost differences
- 2. Subject deposit base versus sales comparables
- e. by pricing within deposit category
- f. by mix
- g. by estimated overhead cost differences
- 3. Replacement cost comparison
- h. retail replacement
- i. by pricing within deposit category
- ii. by mix
- iii. by estimated overhead cost differences
- i. wholesale replacement
- iv. by pricing
- v. by estimated overhead cost differences
- h. retail replacement
- 1. local, regional, national peer rankings of the subject deposit liabilities base versus similar bases
- B. Net Present value analysis (see Appendix) steps:
- 1. determine annual cost savings versus alternative funding activities
- 2. determine discount factor (risk-free rate plus additional risk factor)
- 3. adjust annual cost savings for risk and time value of money as follows: annual cost savings/(1+discount factor)yr
- 4. sum the adjusted annual cost savings
- C. Estimated potential market value(s) determined based on II.A.-B.
- D. Formulate potential bid(s), based on C., subject to investment criteria, which may include:
- 1. probability analysis of put exercise
- 2. contract expiration date
- 3. fees
- 4. regulatory/accounting factors
- 5. options market factors
- A. Comparison outputs, including:
- It will be understood that multiple iterations may be performed to further refine analysis conclusions.
FIG. 1 illustrates one preferred embodiment of a system and method, embodying Steps 1-10, for originating a deposit liability option contract according to the present invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, of course, that other embodiments canceling certain steps, or adding others, may be desirable depending upon the particular transaction. - In another embodiment of the invention, the financial institution seeks permission from the third party to adjust the value of the deposit liabilities base, given (for example) an unanticipated attrition in existing deposits and/or an unanticipated increase in the value of newly attracted funds. This permission may be embodied in the original DLOC contract, or may be negotiated after its execution at some later date. Thus, the DLOC owner might be enabled to claim a recovery from the counterparty for the decline in value of originally existing depositors in exchange for a reduced value for the remaining new deposits. Referring also to
FIG. 2 , here is a specific example: - Original deposits at DLOC origination: $100 m
-
- Minimum Bid secured under DLOC: 3% of original volume=$3 million
- Expected original deposits remaining in Yr. 3: $70 million
- Expected new deposits in Yr. 3: $30 million
- Expected total (original and new) in Yr. 3: $100 million
- Expected Portion of $3 million attributable to original deposits in Yr 3:$2.1 million (0.70 of $3 million)
-
Actual Yr 3 results— -
- Remaining original deposits: $50 million
- New Deposits: $50 million
- Actual Portion of the $3 million attributable to both Original and New: $1.5 million
- Lost value of Original Deposit relationships (expected v. actual): $0.6 million ($2.1 million less $1.5 million)
Potential Result Depositor claims $0.6 million payment from counterparty for impaired value of original deposits while simultaneously reducing remaining recovery value upon potential future exercise $0.6 million.
- Of course, it should be understood that various changes and modifications to the preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Other changes and modifications constituting insubstantial differences from the present invention, such as those expressed here or others left unexpressed but apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages. It is, therefore, intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims.
-
-
- Core deposit volume=$90 million ($2 million other liabilities excluded from core definition)
- Rates/overhead costs constant year to year
- Attrition (i.e., “estimated runoff”)=10% annually
- Expansion/attraction (i.e., “estimated attracted funds”)=12%
- Replacement costs: $30 million 1 year wholesale CD funding @ 5.60%
- $60 million overnight wholesale funding @ 5.00%
- weighted average cost=5.20%
- Discount factor−premium over risk free rate=3.25% estimated BB rated (on Standard & Poors scale) spread over equivalent duration U.S. treasury yield
- Estimated useful life of deposit base=12 years
Claims (9)
1. A method using a computer system for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a financial institution and for originating contractual documents through which the financial institution obtains a right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a third party at a predetermined price, comprising the steps of:
analyzing external market data, and internal data pertaining to the financial institution, and inputting at least some of the external market data and the internal data to the computer system;
calculating an adjustment by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base based on existing funds from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds;
calculating an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base, based at least in part on the analyzed external market data and internal data, as well as the adjustment;
generating a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices for the deposit liabilities base, based at least in part on the estimated market value(s); and
incorporating the generated bid price or the range of such prices into the contractual documents, wherein the price or range of prices which the third party will pay during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities is/are specified;
whereby the value of the deposit liabilities base may be quantified with sufficient certainty so that it may be treated as tangible capital for regulatory and investments purposes, permitting the deposit liabilities base to be sold if desired, but not requiring divestiture of the deposit liabilities base from the financial institution.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating the adjustment is performed after the contractual documents have been executed, and includes the step of the financial institution seeking permission from the third party to include newly attracted funds in the deposit liabilities base based upon a further adjustment.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of the financial institution exercising its right as specified in the contractual documents to sell the deposit liabilities base to the third party.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the external market data comprises data relating to deposit pricing practices.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the internal data relates to the deposit liabilities base of the selling financial institution.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the deposit liabilities base comprises either or both of non-interest bearing and interest bearing deposit accounts.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method of analyzing the value of the deposit liabilities base of the financial institution and originating the contractual documents is incorporated into a purchase accounting acquisition of a selling financial institution.
8. A method using a computer system for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a financial institution seeking to obtain a right to substitute other deposit funds not originally included in the deposit liabilities base, while also seeking to purchase the right to sell a deposit liabilities base, and for providing a deposit liability contract through which the financial institution obtains the right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a third party at a predetermined price, comprising the steps of:
analyzing external market data, and internal data pertaining to the financial institution, and inputting at least some of the external market data and the internal data to the computer system;
calculating an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base;
generating a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices for the deposit liabilities base;
incorporating the generated bid price or the range of such prices into the deposit liability contract, wherein the price or range of prices which will be paid during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities are specified;
whereby the value of the deposit liabilities base may be quantified with sufficient certainty so that it may be treated as tangible capital for regulatory and investments purposes, permitting the deposit liabilities base to be sold if desired, but not requiring divestiture of the deposit liabilities base from the financial institution; and
following execution of the deposit liability contract, calculating an adjustment to the value of the deposit liabilities base by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base based on existing funds from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds, and further including the step of the financial institution seeking permission from the third party to include the newly attracted funds in the deposit liabilities base upon incorporation of the adjustment to the value of the deposit liabilities base.
9. A method using a computer system for analyzing the value of a deposit liabilities base associated with a financial institution and for originating contractual documents through which the financial institution obtains a right to sell the deposit liabilities base to a third party at a predetermined price, comprising the steps of:
analyzing external market data, and internal data pertaining to the financial institution, and inputting at least some of the external market data and the internal data to the computer system;
calculating an adjustment by subtracting an estimated attrition of the deposit liabilities base based on existing funds from an estimated increase of the deposit liabilities base based on newly attracted funds;
calculating an estimated market value or a range of such values for the deposit liabilities base, based at least in part on the analyzed external market data and internal data, as well as the adjustment;
generating a minimum potential bid price or a range of such prices for the deposit liabilities base, based at least in part on the estimated market value(s); and
incorporating the generated bid price or the range of such prices into the contractual documents, wherein the price or range of prices which the third party will pay during a predetermined term for the deposit liabilities is/are specified;
whereby the value of the deposit liabilities base is determinable, permitting the deposit liabilities base to be sold if desired, but not requiring divestiture of the deposit liabilities base from the financial institution.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/463,437 US20100023438A1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2006-08-09 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/406,214 US6363360B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 1999-09-27 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
US10/023,298 US7117177B2 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2001-12-17 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
US11/463,437 US20100023438A1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2006-08-09 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/023,298 Continuation US7117177B2 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2001-12-17 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100023438A1 true US20100023438A1 (en) | 2010-01-28 |
Family
ID=23607019
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/406,214 Expired - Lifetime US6363360B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 1999-09-27 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
US10/023,298 Expired - Lifetime US7117177B2 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2001-12-17 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
US11/463,437 Abandoned US20100023438A1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2006-08-09 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/406,214 Expired - Lifetime US6363360B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 1999-09-27 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
US10/023,298 Expired - Lifetime US7117177B2 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2001-12-17 | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6363360B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU6772900A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001024079A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8630931B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2014-01-14 | Timothy B. Bendel | System and method for funding companies |
Families Citing this family (70)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7668772B1 (en) | 1998-10-21 | 2010-02-23 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Systems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation |
US7752129B2 (en) | 1998-10-21 | 2010-07-06 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Systems and methods for managing client accounts |
US7536350B1 (en) | 1998-10-21 | 2009-05-19 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Systems and methods for providing enhanced account management services for multiple banks |
US6374231B1 (en) | 1998-10-21 | 2002-04-16 | Bruce Bent | Money fund banking system |
US6363360B1 (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2002-03-26 | Martin P. Madden | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
US8606588B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2013-12-10 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Merger and acquisition knowledgebase |
US6671692B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2003-12-30 | Accenture Llp | System for facilitating the navigation of data |
US6671693B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2003-12-30 | Accenture Llp | System for effectively collecting and disseminating data |
US7376612B1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2008-05-20 | Khai Hee Kwan | System and method for conducting an electronic financial asset deposit auction over computer network |
US7349860B1 (en) * | 2000-08-24 | 2008-03-25 | Creative Innovators Associates, Llc | Insurance incentive program having a term of years for promoting the purchase or lease of an automobile |
US7801750B1 (en) | 2000-08-23 | 2010-09-21 | Disruptive Technologies Ltd. | Insurance incentive program for promoting the purchase or lease of an automobile |
US7831466B1 (en) | 2000-08-24 | 2010-11-09 | Disruptive Technologies Ltd. | Insurance incentive program for promoting the purchase or release of an automobile after an expiration of a lease |
US7742936B2 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2010-06-22 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system of assessing liability for an accident using impact groups |
US7328179B2 (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2008-02-05 | Mcguire Performance Solutions, Inc. | System for determining a useful life of core deposits and interest rate sensitivity thereof |
WO2003017064A2 (en) * | 2001-08-21 | 2003-02-27 | Apogee Networks | Content transaction resolution |
AU2002364036A1 (en) | 2001-12-24 | 2003-07-15 | Digimarc Id Systems, Llc | Laser etched security features for identification documents and methods of making same |
EP1459239B1 (en) | 2001-12-24 | 2012-04-04 | L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. | Covert variable information on id documents and methods of making same |
US7694887B2 (en) | 2001-12-24 | 2010-04-13 | L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. | Optically variable personalized indicia for identification documents |
US7818219B2 (en) | 2001-12-27 | 2010-10-19 | American Hungarian Technologies Inc. | Electronic realty and transaction system and method therein |
AU2003221894A1 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2003-10-27 | Digimarc Id Systems, Llc | Image processing techniques for printing identification cards and documents |
US7824029B2 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2010-11-02 | L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. | Identification card printer-assembler for over the counter card issuing |
US20040128232A1 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2004-07-01 | Paul Descloux | Mortgage prepayment forecasting system |
US7702528B2 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2010-04-20 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for determining breach of duty in premises liability for an accident |
US20040054557A1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2004-03-18 | Stefan Wahlbin | Computerized method and system for estimating premises liability for an accident |
US7672860B2 (en) | 2002-09-09 | 2010-03-02 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for determining the contribution of defenses to premises liability for an accident |
US20040054558A1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2004-03-18 | Stefan Wahlbin | Computerized method and system for determining claimant status in premises liability for an accident |
US7804982B2 (en) | 2002-11-26 | 2010-09-28 | L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and detecting fraud in image databases used with identification documents |
US7702529B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2010-04-20 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating an effect on liability using claim data accessed from claim reporting software |
US20040102984A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-05-27 | Stefan Wahlbin | Computerized method and system for estimating liability using recorded vehicle data |
US7809586B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2010-10-05 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating an effect on liability using a comparison of the actual speed of a vehicle in an accident and time and distance traveled by the vehicles in a merging vehicle accident |
US7805321B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2010-09-28 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating liability for an accident from an investigation of the accident |
US7792690B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2010-09-07 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating an effect on liability of the speed of vehicles in an accident and time and distance traveled by the vehicles |
US7660725B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2010-02-09 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating an effect on liability based on the stopping distance of vehicles |
US7818187B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2010-10-19 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating liability |
US7725334B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2010-05-25 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for estimating liability for an accident using dynamic generation of questions |
US7895063B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2011-02-22 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Computerized method and system for creating pre-configured claim reports including liability in an accident estimated using a computer system |
US7698208B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2010-04-13 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Systems and methods for an online credit derivative trading system |
US7970693B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2011-06-28 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Systems and methods for market order volume clearing in online trading of credit derivatives |
US20080033867A1 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2008-02-07 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Centralized process for determining deltas for index tranches |
US20040111355A1 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2004-06-10 | Creditex, Inc. | Systems and methods for tracking price information in an online credit derivative trading system |
US7587355B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2009-09-08 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Systems and methods for an online credit derivative trading system |
US8645258B2 (en) | 2002-12-09 | 2014-02-04 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Systems and methods for an online credit derivative trading system |
US7716114B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2010-05-11 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Systems and methods for an online credit derivative trading system |
US20040125396A1 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2004-07-01 | James Burke | System and method for routing voice/video/fax mail |
US8150766B1 (en) | 2003-01-27 | 2012-04-03 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | System and method for investing public deposits |
ATE491190T1 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2010-12-15 | L 1 Secure Credentialing Inc | THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA STORAGE |
US7904372B2 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2011-03-08 | Finistar, Inc. | Methods and systems for facilitating transactions between commercial banks and pooled depositor groups |
US8090651B2 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2012-01-03 | Anova Financial Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for facilitating the exchange of reciprocal deposits |
US20050108063A1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2005-05-19 | Madill Robert P.Jr. | Systems and methods for assessing the potential for fraud in business transactions |
US8799120B2 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2014-08-05 | Capital One Financial Corporation | Systems and methods for managing a financial investment fund |
MXPA06008873A (en) * | 2004-02-04 | 2007-02-16 | Res Affiliates Llc | Separate trading of registered interest and principal of securities system, method and computer program product. |
US8560414B2 (en) * | 2004-02-04 | 2013-10-15 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Synthetic ultralong inflation-protected separate trading of registered interest and principal of securities system, method and computer program product |
US20060059021A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-16 | Jim Yulman | Independent adjuster advisor |
EP1810240A4 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2008-12-24 | Creditex Inc | Systems and methods for an online credit derivative trading system |
US8380621B1 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2013-02-19 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Systems, methods and program products for swap processing for uninsured accounts |
US7752107B1 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2010-07-06 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | System and method for managing aggregated accounts |
US8260705B1 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2012-09-04 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Systems, methods and program products for deposit and withdrawal processing |
US8032456B1 (en) | 2008-02-11 | 2011-10-04 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | System, methods and program products for processing for a self clearing broker dealer |
WO2009064550A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-22 | Creditex Group, Inc. | Techniques for reducing delta values of credit risk positions in online trading of credit derivatives |
US8244558B2 (en) | 2008-01-18 | 2012-08-14 | Computer Sciences Corporation | Determining recommended settlement amounts by adjusting values derived from matching similar claims |
US8386352B1 (en) * | 2009-02-27 | 2013-02-26 | Intuit Inc. | System and method for providing accounting adjustment rules in trial balances |
US8781931B1 (en) | 2009-05-26 | 2014-07-15 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Method and system for allocating deposits over a plurality of depository institutions |
US8352342B1 (en) | 2009-06-19 | 2013-01-08 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Method and system for determining fees for deposits allocated over a plurality of deposit institutions |
US20110035314A1 (en) * | 2009-08-04 | 2011-02-10 | Mari Beth Bolger | Mortgage Program |
US8370236B1 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2013-02-05 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Method and system for allocating funds over a plurality of time deposit instruments in depository institutions |
US8458089B1 (en) | 2010-06-14 | 2013-06-04 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | System, method and program product for administering fund movements using depository institution groups |
US8583545B1 (en) | 2010-09-20 | 2013-11-12 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | Systems and methods for money fund banking with flexible interest allocation |
US8452702B1 (en) | 2011-09-08 | 2013-05-28 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | System, method and program product for minimizing fund movements |
US8655689B1 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2014-02-18 | Island Intellectual Property Llc | System, method and program product for modeling fund movements |
US9374370B1 (en) | 2015-01-23 | 2016-06-21 | Island Intellectual Property, Llc | Invariant biohash security system and method |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5202827A (en) * | 1990-05-10 | 1993-04-13 | Sober Michael S | Apparatus for insuring futures contracts against catastrophic loss |
US5557517A (en) * | 1994-07-29 | 1996-09-17 | Daughterty, Iii; Vergil L. | System and method for determining the price of an expirationless American option and issuing a buy or sell ticket on the current price and portfolio |
US5671363A (en) * | 1992-09-01 | 1997-09-23 | Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. | Private stock option account control and exercise system |
US5715402A (en) * | 1995-11-09 | 1998-02-03 | Spot Metals Online | Method and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals |
US5787402A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-07-28 | Crossmar, Inc. | Method and system for performing automated financial transactions involving foreign currencies |
US5787405A (en) * | 1994-09-29 | 1998-07-28 | Ffp Financial Services, L.P. | Method and system for creating financial instruments at a plurality of remote locations which are controlled by a central office |
US5802499A (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1998-09-01 | Cedel Bank | Method and system for providing credit support to parties associated with derivative and other financial transactions |
US5897621A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1999-04-27 | Cybercash, Inc. | System and method for multi-currency transactions |
US5897625A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-04-27 | Capital Security Systems, Inc. | Automated document cashing system |
US5970479A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1999-10-19 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty. Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US6058379A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2000-05-02 | Auction Source, L.L.C. | Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation |
US6061661A (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2000-05-09 | Hagan; Bernard P. | System for monitoring increasing income financial products |
US6085169A (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2000-07-04 | Priceline.Com Incorporated | Conditional purchase offer management system |
US6330547B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2001-12-11 | Mosaic Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for establishing and enhancing the creditworthiness of intellectual property |
US6363360B1 (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2002-03-26 | Martin P. Madden | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5557157A (en) | 1989-11-30 | 1996-09-17 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Vibration driven motor |
-
1999
- 1999-09-27 US US09/406,214 patent/US6363360B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-08-11 AU AU67729/00A patent/AU6772900A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-08-11 WO PCT/US2000/022309 patent/WO2001024079A1/en active Application Filing
-
2001
- 2001-12-17 US US10/023,298 patent/US7117177B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2006
- 2006-08-09 US US11/463,437 patent/US20100023438A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5202827A (en) * | 1990-05-10 | 1993-04-13 | Sober Michael S | Apparatus for insuring futures contracts against catastrophic loss |
US5970479A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1999-10-19 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty. Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US5671363A (en) * | 1992-09-01 | 1997-09-23 | Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. | Private stock option account control and exercise system |
US5557517A (en) * | 1994-07-29 | 1996-09-17 | Daughterty, Iii; Vergil L. | System and method for determining the price of an expirationless American option and issuing a buy or sell ticket on the current price and portfolio |
US5787405A (en) * | 1994-09-29 | 1998-07-28 | Ffp Financial Services, L.P. | Method and system for creating financial instruments at a plurality of remote locations which are controlled by a central office |
US5802499A (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1998-09-01 | Cedel Bank | Method and system for providing credit support to parties associated with derivative and other financial transactions |
US5715402A (en) * | 1995-11-09 | 1998-02-03 | Spot Metals Online | Method and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals |
US5787402A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-07-28 | Crossmar, Inc. | Method and system for performing automated financial transactions involving foreign currencies |
US5897621A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1999-04-27 | Cybercash, Inc. | System and method for multi-currency transactions |
US6085169A (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2000-07-04 | Priceline.Com Incorporated | Conditional purchase offer management system |
US5897625A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-04-27 | Capital Security Systems, Inc. | Automated document cashing system |
US6058379A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2000-05-02 | Auction Source, L.L.C. | Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation |
US6330547B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2001-12-11 | Mosaic Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for establishing and enhancing the creditworthiness of intellectual property |
US6061661A (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2000-05-09 | Hagan; Bernard P. | System for monitoring increasing income financial products |
US6363360B1 (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2002-03-26 | Martin P. Madden | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8630931B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2014-01-14 | Timothy B. Bendel | System and method for funding companies |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7117177B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 |
US6363360B1 (en) | 2002-03-26 |
AU6772900A (en) | 2001-04-30 |
WO2001024079A1 (en) | 2001-04-05 |
US20020082981A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7117177B2 (en) | System and method for analyzing and originating a contractual option arrangement for a bank deposits liabilities base | |
Abor | Managing foreign exchange risk among Ghanaian firms | |
Benston | The shortcomings of fair-value accounting described in SFAS 157 | |
Zack | Fair value accounting fraud: new global risks and detection techniques | |
Ul Haque et al. | The design of instruments for government finance in an Islamic economy | |
King et al. | A user's guide to the Triennial Central Bank Survey of foreign exchange market activity | |
Respect | Responsibility | |
Guselbaeva et al. | The estimation of property and business in the anti-crisis measures | |
Bank et al. | Certificates of Deposit | |
Klimenok | The influence of capital structure on the value of the firm: A study of European firms | |
Ferrari et al. | Collateral scarcity premia in eu repo markets | |
Gundogdu | Conquistador | |
Açıkgöz | Investigation of the effect of the assessment of the company on the financial tables and the sampling of FAVÖK (EBITDA) method on a ring open company | |
Erkan et al. | Comparison of valuation measures in terms of Turkey accounting/financial reporting standards (TMS/TFRS), financial reporting standard for large and medium-sized entities (BOBI FRS) and the tax procedure law (VUK): A study onto the asset structure of financial position statement | |
Statements | Independent auditors’ report | |
Collings | Interpretation and application of UK GAAP: For accounting periods commencing on or After 1 January 2015 | |
Abdullah | Analysis of internal factor (Operating Margin) affect the Coty Incorporated Performance. | |
Rusuhuzwa et al. | Financial System Development and Monetary Policy | |
You et al. | ISIN: INE418F01015 | |
Uzun et al. | Comparıson of valuatıon measures ın terms of Turkey accountıng/fınancıal reportıng standards (tms/tfrs), fınancıal reportıng standard for large and medıum-sızed entıtıes (bobı frs) and the tax procedure law (vuk): A study onto the asset structure of fınancıal posıtıon statement | |
Abed | The Impact of Investment Banking on Credit Risk: An Analytical Study of the Iraqi Credit Bank | |
Lessambo | Short-Term Assets: Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
Khaled | Why Interest is Halal in Today's World | |
JP et al. | The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | |
Subramanian R et al. | Commercial Banks, Banking Systems, and Basel Recommendations |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |