Search Images Maps Play Gmail Drive Calendar Translate More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080255966 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/100,106
Publication date16 Oct 2008
Filing date9 Apr 2008
Priority date27 Oct 1999
Also published asUS7373317, US7373319, US8326697, US20040138962, US20040138966, US20120197695
Publication number100106, 12100106, US 2008/0255966 A1, US 2008/255966 A1, US 20080255966 A1, US 20080255966A1, US 2008255966 A1, US 2008255966A1, US-A1-20080255966, US-A1-2008255966, US2008/0255966A1, US2008/255966A1, US20080255966 A1, US20080255966A1, US2008255966 A1, US2008255966A1
InventorsJoshua M. Kopelman, Srinivas Balijepalli
Original AssigneeEbay
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and Apparatus For Facilitating Sales of Goods By Independent Parties
US 20080255966 A1
Abstract
A method for facilitating sales and pricing of independent parties' goods. The method removes price control from buyers and sellers by deriving a sale price from an index price using a method set by either the seller or a third party. The index price is provided by a party other than the buyer or seller. The sale price may be derived at a time of sale or at a time of registering the good for sale. The standard ID code of readily identifiable, fungible, durable goods is used by sellers to identify used goods to the marketeer. The marketeer exploits the nature of such goods by choosing the price of a comparable new good as an index price and deriving a discounted sale price for the used good from the price of a new good having essentially the same value due to its fungible, durable nature. A best price for a good is ensured by using as the index price a lowest price among a group of vendors for a comparable good.
In a computer-implemented version of the method, a shopping agent program is used to query one or more vendors to determine a best price for a comparable good and a pricing agent program is used to derive a discounted sale price for the good from the best price for the new good.
An apparatus for performing a computer-implemented version of the inventive method is also provided.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(36)
1. A computer-implemented method for pricing an independent seller's good using a marketeer controller capable of communicating with a buyer interface and a seller interface via a communications network, the marketeer controller including a CPU and a memory operatively connected to the CPU and containing a program stored in the memory and executable by said CPU for deriving a sale price of the good, the method comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving from the seller, via the communications network, an expression of interest in selling the good;
(b) querying a vendor's controller to determine the vendor's price of a comparable good; and
(c) executing the program to derive the sale price for the good from the vendor's price using a predetermined method.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) comprises the step of:
(d) equating an index price to the vendor's price of the comparable good.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the seller's good is a used, fungible, durable good and the comparable good is a similar new good.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein step (b) is performed responsive to step (a).
5. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of:
(e) receiving from the buyer, via the communications network, an expression of interest in purchasing the good, step (b) being performed responsive to step (e).
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the expression of interest received in step (a) is a standard identification code identifying the good, the method further comprising the step of:
(f) storing the identification code in the memory to register the good with a marketeer as an item for sale by the seller, step (f) being performed before step (b).
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the identification code comprises a universal product code (UPC).
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the identification code comprises an International Standard Book Number (ISBN).
9. The method of claim 5, further comprising the steps of:
(g) presenting the good in a marketplace as an item for sale at an unidentified price, the marketplace being accessible by a buyer using a buyer interface via the communications network, step (g) being performed before step (e); and
(h) presenting the good for sale in the marketplace at the sale price, step (h) being performed after step (c).
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the marketplace is a website.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the communications network is a publicly accessible communications network.
12. The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of:
(i) receiving from the seller data specifying the predetermined method, step (i) being performed before step (c).
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the predetermined method comprises discounting the index price for a comparable good by approximately fifty percent to determine the sale price for the seller's good.
14. The method of claim 10, wherein:
step (b) comprises querying multiple third parties to determine multiple third party prices of the comparable good; and
step (d) comprises equating the index price to the lowest of the multiple third party prices determined in step (b).
15. The method of claim 9, wherein the predetermined method is set by the marketeer.
16. A marketeer controller for processing data for pricing an independent seller's good, comprising:
a central processing unit (CPU) for executing programs;
a memory operatively connected to the CPU;
a network interface device operatively connected to the CPU for communicating with a seller interface and a vendor's controller via a communications network;
a first program stored in the memory for receiving and storing data from the seller to identify a good;
a shopping agent program stored in the memory for querying a vendor's controller to determine the vendor's price of a comparable good similar to the seller's good and for determining an index price based on the vendor's price; and
a pricing agent program stored in the memory for deriving a sale price of the good from the index price using a predetermined method.
17. The marketeer controller of claim 16, further comprising a second program stored in the memory for receiving data from a buyer representing the buyer's interest in purchasing the good, wherein the shopping agent program is executed responsive to receipt of data representing the buyer's interest in purchasing the good.
18. The marketeer controller of claim 17, wherein the shopping agent program is configured to use the standard identification code to query the vendor's controller.
19. The marketeer controller of claim 18, wherein the shopping agent program is configured to query multiple vendor controllers to determine multiple vendor prices for the comparable good and to equate the index price to the lowest of the multiple vendor prices.
20. The marketeer controller of claim 19, wherein the predetermined method used by the pricing agent program is specified by the marketeer controller.
21. The marketeer controller of claim 19, wherein the seller specifies the predetermined method used by the pricing agent program and the first program receives and stores in the memory data indicating the predetermined method.
22. The marketeer controller of claim 21, wherein the predetermined method comprises discounting the index price for a comparable good by approximately fifty percent to determine the sale price for the seller's good.
23. The marketeer controller of claim 22, further comprising a third program for presenting the good for sale at the sale price.
24. A method for pricing an independent seller's used good comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving an expression of a seller's interest in selling the good;
(b) querying a vendor to determine the vendor's price for a comparable new good; and
(c) deriving a sale price for the used good from the vendor's price for the new good, using a predetermined method.
25. The method of claim 24, further comprising the step of:
(d) receiving from a seller a standard identification code identifying a good.
26. A method for facilitating sale of an independent seller's used good by a marketeer comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving from a seller a standard identification code identifying a good;
(b) obtaining the seller's agreement to sell the good at a price determined by a marketeer using a predetermined method;
(c) receiving from the buyer an expression of interest in purchasing the good;
(d) determining an index price equal to a vendor's price for a comparable new good;
(e) deriving a sale price for the used good from the index price using the predetermined method; and
(f) presenting the good for sale at the sale price.
27. The method of claim 26, further comprising the steps of:
(g) receiving an indication that the buyer wishes to buy the good at the sale price;
(h) identifying the seller to the buyer and the buyer to the seller so that the seller may sell the good to the buyer.
28. The method of claim 26, further comprising the steps of:
(i) receiving an indication that the buyer wishes to buy the good at the sale price;
(j) aiding sale of the good by acting as a clearinghouse by receiving the good from the seller, receiving payment in the amount of the sale price from the buyer, and then shipping the good to the buyer and providing compensation to the seller.
29. The method of claim 28, wherein the marketeer retains a portion of the sale price.
30. The method of claim 26, further comprising the steps of:
(k) receiving an indication that the buyer wishes to buy the good at the sale price;
(l) aiding sale of the good by referring the buyer and the seller to an intermediary acting as a clearinghouse.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the marketeer acts as a clearinghouse by receiving the good from the seller, receiving payment in the amount of the sale price from the buyer, and then shipping the good to the buyer and proving compensation to the seller.
32. The method of claim 31, wherein the marketeer receives a portion of the sale price.
33. The method of claim 26, wherein the method is a computer implemented method and steps (a) through (f) are performed by computer programs communicating via a communications network.
34. The method of claim 26, wherein step (d) is performed responsive to step (a).
35. The method of claim 26, wherein step (d) is performed responsive to step (b).
36. The method of claim 26, wherein step (d) is performed responsive to step (c).
Description
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    This invention relates generally to the field of pricing goods for sale and particularly to a method and apparatus for pricing and selling goods in electronic commerce applications using communications networks.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The industrial age has given rise to a global economy of factories engaged in mass production of various goods. An enormous amount of commerce is transacted in the buying and selling of such goods. While some such goods lose their value with use, e.g., food products, many such goods retain a substantial portion of their value even after use or ownership by another. Such goods are referred to herein as “durable”. A considerable amount of commerce is transacted in the buying and selling of durable goods, particularly used durable goods.
  • [0003]
    Almost all durable goods are readily identifiable by a standard unique identification code (“ID code”), particularly those that are mass produced. In the case of computer software, music cassettes or compact discs, videocassettes and digital video discs, the ID code may be a human readable Universal Product Code (“UPC”), a thirteen digit ID code that readily identifies the good. In the case of books, magazines or other publications, the ID code may be a ten-digit International Standard Book Number (“ISBN”). Other items are more readily identified by a manufacturer or brand name and a model number, as for baseball cards and consumer electronics, e.g., a SonyŽ KV-3620 television. Some goods may be identified by more than one type of ID code.
  • [0004]
    Many durable and readily identifiable goods are fungible items that derive their value substantially from their common characteristics. For example, a single signed copy of Michael Jackson's album titled “Thriller” and recorded on a compact disc (“CD”) derives much of its value because it is signed by the performance artist. Such a CD is unique and therefore is not a fungible good. In contrast, an unsigned copy of Michael Jackson's “Thriller” CD derives substantially all of its value because of the songs recorded thereon. Therefore, all such CD's have substantially the same value to consumers. Such CD's are therefore fungible.
  • [0005]
    Auctions provide one type of marketplace for selling goods. Used goods sold at auction are sold at prices set by interested buyers. An auctioneer facilitates sale transactions without the need to maintain goods in inventory. Auctions are particularly good for sellers to insure a highest possible sale price, especially for unique, non-fungible items. However, determining and ensuring a fair price is difficult for buyers. Buyers must have a high degree of knowledge to determine whether a price for a certain good is fair.
  • [0006]
    Retail selling also provides a marketplace for sale of goods. Used goods sold at retail are sold at prices set by a seller. Retail selling is advantageous to the seller because it allows the seller to control the price of the good. However, it requires the seller to maintain a large inventory of goods, which is expensive and disadvantageous. Competition, particularly for fungible goods, drives prices downward which is advantageous to the buyer. The seller must have a high degree of knowledge to ensure that his price is competitive. In addition, a price for a good may be fair to the buyer when set by the seller, but may no longer be fair if market conditions change after the price is set and before the buyer purchases the good.
  • [0007]
    Electronic commerce, or Internet-based sales are common and have problems similar to retail. Numerous online auctions may be found. An example of such an online auction is held by eBay Inc. of San Jose, Calif., at www.ebay.com. Such auctions are better suited to unique goods but are also used for fungible goods. However, “bidding wars” between buyers can lead to high prices for such goods, whether new or used.
  • [0008]
    Retail type sales are also conducted at numerous online websites, such as www.amazon.com. Online retail selling is also disadvantageous because it requires the seller to maintain a substantial inventory of goods. A reverse-auction system, where a seller may accept a price set by a buyer is provided on the worldwide web at www.priceline.com by priceline.com Inc. of Stamford, Conn. U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,127 to Walker et al. discloses a reverse auction method, apparatus and program for pricing, selling and exercising options to purchase airline tickets.
  • [0009]
    For electronic commerce applications, software-implemented shopping agents are well known. Using a shopping agent, a buyer can identify vendors and prices for a good. One type of shopping agent queries multiple vendor's websites to determine a best price or list of prices. For example Cendant Corp. of New York, N.Y. is a retail seller of new books which provides access to such a shopping agent on the worldwide web at www.books.com. Books.com uses a pricing agent (“Price Compare”) to price items it sells and holds in its inventory. It uses the shopping agent to query several competitors and, if its price for a new book is not less than its competitors' prices, the pricing agent sets the price for its new book at less than the lowest competitor's price for the same new book. However, the seller still controls the price since it determines the method used by its pricing agent to set the price. In addition, the seller is required to maintain a substantial inventory of books.
  • [0010]
    Until now, there has been no acceptable way to facilitate sales of goods which ensures fair pricing while eliminating the need for inventory and minimizing pricing burdens on the buyer and the seller. In addition there is no acceptable way to exploit the fungible nature of durable goods.
  • [0011]
    Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for facilitating pricing and sales of goods.
  • [0012]
    It is another object of the present invention to provide a method which does not require maintenance of an inventory of goods.
  • [0013]
    It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method for pricing goods for sale by independent sellers.
  • [0014]
    It is a further object of the present invention to ensure lowest pricing of goods which exploits the fungible nature of goods.
  • [0015]
    It is yet a further object of the present invention to exploit the fungible nature of used durable goods to price goods.
  • [0016]
    It is yet a further object of the present invention to derive a price for an independent seller's good as a function of a third party's price for a similar good.
  • [0017]
    It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide an apparatus for facilitating sales and pricing of goods.
  • [0018]
    It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a computer-implemented method for facilitating sales and pricing of goods.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0019]
    The invention provides a method for facilitating sales and pricing of goods by removing direct price control from the buyer and the seller. The invention automates the pricing process by deriving a sale price from a third party's index price using a method set by either the seller or an intermediary, referred to herein as the “marketeer”. A current index price is determined by reference to a party other than the buyer or seller at a time of listing the good for sale or at a time of the sale. An appealing price for an item may be ensured by using a lowest price of a group of vendors for a comparable good as the index price and deriving a discounted sale price from the index price. The readily identifiable, fungible nature of durable goods is exploited by the sellers to identify used goods to the marketeer using a standard ID code. The good is never received for sale by the marketeer yet its characteristics are known. The marketeer exploits the nature of such goods when determining the index price for a new good and when pricing a used good by deriving from the index price a sale price representing a discount to the buyer for a used good having essentially the same value as a new good.
  • [0020]
    A computer-implemented method for pricing an independent seller's good using a marketeer controller is also provided. The marketeer controller is capable of communicating with a buyer interface and a seller interface via a communications network, the marketeer controller including a CPU and a memory operatively connected to the CPU. The marketeer controller stores in its memory a program executable by the CPU for deriving a sale price of the good. The computer-implemented method comprises the steps of: receiving from the buyer via the communications network, an expression of interest in purchasing the good; querying a vendor's controller to determine the vendor's price of a comparable good; and executing the program to derive the sale price of the good using a predetermined method.
  • [0021]
    A marketeer controller for processing data for pricing an independent seller's good in accordance with the present invention is also provided. The marketeer controller comprises: a central processing unit (CPU) for executing programs; a memory operatively connected to the CPU; a network interface device operatively connected to the CPU for communicating with a seller interface and a vendor's controller via a communications network; a first program stored in the memory for receiving identification code data from the seller to identify a good and for storing the data; a second program stored in the memory for receiving data from a buyer representing the buyer's interest in purchasing the good; a shopping agent program stored in the memory for querying a vendor's controller to determine the vendor's price of a comparable good similar to the seller's good and for determining an index price as a function of the vendor's price and a pricing agent program stored in the memory for deriving a sale price of the good from the index price using a predetermined method.
  • [0022]
    A non-computer-implemented method for pricing an independent seller's good also is provided.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0023]
    FIG. 1 is a flow diagram providing an example of a transaction in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0024]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a marketeer controller in accordance with the present invention; and
  • [0025]
    FIG. 3 is a flow diagram providing an example of a computer-implemented method for pricing and facilitating sale of an independent seller's good in accordance with the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0026]
    The present invention provides a method and apparatus for facilitating sales between buyers and sellers and pricing goods for sale. A marketeer facilitates sales and pricing of the sellers' goods. In one embodiment an index price is obtained from a third party at a time proximate to the time the buyer wishes to buy the good. In the preferred embodiment, the index price is obtained from a third party at a time proximate to the time the seller registers the good with the marketeer as a good for sale by the seller. The seller agrees, before the sale, to sell his good at a sale price determined by the marketeer using an index price as a reference. The seller may specify a method for deriving the sale price as a function of the index price. Alternatively, the marketeer may specify the method. In alternate embodiments, the seller is presented with additional alternative options for pricing the seller's good, e.g., to specify a fixed price, or to specify a discount from a suggested retail price, i.e., a “list” or “cover” price instead of deriving a price from an index price. The marketeer may optionally store a database of suggested retail prices.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 1 is a flow diagram providing an example of a transaction in accordance with the present invention in which the index price is determined at or near the time of the sale. By way of example, the invention will be discussed below in the contexts of sale of a used paperback copy of Sue Grafton's book titled “A is for Alibi”. First, a seller identifies (“registers”) his book for sale with the marketeer as shown at step 20. The marketeer does not take possession of the book for inventory purposes but rather registers the book as an item for sale. The marketeer presents the book in a marketplace as an item for sale by an undisclosed seller, as shown at step 22. If the method is computer-implemented, the marketplace may be a website and the book may be presented using images and/or text retrieved from an existing database—such information need not be provided by the seller. To a buyer, it may appear that the book is being offered for sale by the marketeer. In an alternate embodiment, the marketplace could be a conventional type storefront including a booth or kiosk presenting a printed catalog or brochure depicting goods, and/or product samples representing goods for sale.
  • [0028]
    The buyer may browse the marketplace and the goods presented for sale by the marketeer. When the buyer expresses an interest in a the book, the marketeer determines an index price for the book, as shown at steps 24 and 26. In one embodiment, the index price is an independent third party's price for a comparable good, preferably a new book, if the seller is offering a used book. In an alternate embodiment, the index price is the lowest price among a group of independent third parties' prices for the comparable good. If the method is computer-implemented, the index price may be determined by querying a third party vendor's computer or web server, e.g., using a standard product identification code such as a universal product code (“UPC”) or International Standard Book Number (“ISBN”). For example, the marketeer could query amazon.com to determine that amazon.com is selling a new paperback copy of “A is for Alibi” for $10 and set the index price to $10. Determining an index price proximate the time of sale to the buyer ensures a fair or lowest price for the good relative to other vendors' prices.
  • [0029]
    The marketeer then derives a sale price from the index price, as shown at step 28. In one embodiment, the method for deriving the price is determined by the marketeer. In another embodiment, the method for deriving the price is specified by the seller at the time the seller presents the good to the marketeer for sale. For example, the method may represent a discount from the index price, e.g., a 50% discount from the index price. In this example, the marketeer derives a sale price of $5 for the seller's used book by applying a 50% discount to amazon.com's price of $10 for a new paperback copy of “A is for Alibi”. This ensures that the sale price is fair, in one embodiment, or the lowest price, in another embodiment. The marketeer then presents the book for sale to the buyer at the sale price. If the buyer decides to buy the book at the sale price, the marketeer facilitates the purchase/sale transaction between the buyer and the seller, as shown at step 30 and 32. The marketeer may facilitate the sale, for example, by identifying the buyer to the seller and the seller to the buyer and permitting the buyer and seller to complete the transaction. Alternatively, the marketeer may facilitate the same by referring the parties to a third party intermediary acting as a clearinghouse for the transaction, or by acting as the clearinghouse itself. When the marketeer acts as the clearinghouse, it receives only sold goods and therefore has no inventory in the traditional sense. In the preferred embodiment, the marketeer is compensated for facilitating the transaction.
  • [0030]
    It should be appreciated that such a transaction may be implemented in a variety of ways. For example, all communications between the buyer, seller, marketeer, and vendors could be made between humans by telephone. However, in the preferred embodiment, the inventive method is software-implemented in an electronic commerce application and all communications are transmitted electronically between computers communicating via a communications network.
  • [0031]
    In the preferred embodiment, the marketeer provides an electronic marketplace, e.g., a website, wherein sellers of goods can register their goods with the marketeer for sale. The website is accessible to buyers and sellers via a communications network, such as the Internet. Buyers and sellers can communicate with the marketeer, or its marketeer controller, e.g., a web server, using an interface and interface software. For example, the buyer and seller interface may each comprise a personal computer running standard web browser software and having network access capability, as is known in the art.
  • [0032]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a marketeer controller 70 in accordance with the present invention. The marketeer controller also includes a central processing unit (“CPU”) 72, random access memory (“RAM”) 74, read only memory (“ROM”) 76, and a communications port (“COMM PORT”) 78 connected to a network interface device 80 for communicating over a communications network. The marketeer controller 70 also includes a storage memory including a storage device 82 for storing data including a first program for receiving identification code data from a seller to identify a good presented for sale by a seller, a second program for receiving data representing a buyer's interest in purchasing a good, a shopping agent program for identifying an index price, a pricing agent program for deriving a sale price and other data required to complete sale transactions, e.g. buyer's and sellers identity or contact information, information representing seller's selection of a method for deriving a price, etc.
  • [0033]
    The marketeer controller is interconnected with or interconnectable to buyer and seller interfaces (i.e., computers running standard web browser software) via a communications network such that information can be transmitted back and forth between the buyer and seller interfaces and the marketeer controller and such that the marketeer controller can transmit information back and forth between third party vendors' computers (not shown).
  • [0034]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing flow of an example of a computer-implemented method for pricing and facilitating sale of an independent seller's good in which the index price is determined near a time of registering the good for sale. A seller first reaches the marketeer's website, as shown at step 100. In effect, the seller is entering the marketeer's virtual marketplace. A seller may do so by visiting the marketeer's website using his buyer interface, i.e., personal computer, to access the marketeer controller via the communications network. The seller then identifies to the marketeer a good he wishes to sell, in effect, registering the good for sale with the marketeer. To do so, the seller submits a standard identification code to the marketeer, as shown at step 110. This may be achieved by the seller using his keyboard to enter the code into a field provided by the marketeer's website, as is known in the art. The standard identification code may be a universal product code (UPC) or an International Standard Book Number (ISBN), for example. The use of a standard identification code identifies the good in a manner readily identifiable by the marketeer and/or buyers. The marketeer controller stores the identification code in its memory to register the good as an item for sale by the seller, as shown at step 120. The marketeer controller may also store in its memory data provided by the seller to identify the seller as the owner of the good.
  • [0035]
    In accordance with the method, the seller does not specify a price but rather specifies a method for determining a sale price from an index price, as shown at step 130. As discussed above, the method could include a discount from a manufacturer's list price. In the preferred embodiment, the seller specifies a method including a discount from a price of a comparable new good by a certain percentage. This may be achieved, for example, by the seller's selection of an option from a menu presented by the marketeer, e.g., by selecting a button or check-box using his mouse, as is well known in the art. For example, the marketeer may present a menu of options for a 70% discount from a manufacturer's suggested retail price, a 70% discount from a price for a comparable new good, a 50% discount from a manufacturer's suggested retail price, or a 50% discount from a price for a comparable new good. The marketeer controller also stores in its memory data indicating the method specified by the seller for pricing the good, as shown at step 140. In one embodiment, the seller is also presented with an option for specifying a fixed price for the good.
  • [0036]
    The marketeer determines an index price for the good, as shown at step 150. In the preferred embodiment, determination of the index price is performed by the marketeer controller. To do so, the monitor controller queries multiple third party vendors of comparable goods to determine their respective prices and to equate the index price to the lowest price of a group of third party vendors for a new good similar to the used good offered for sale by the seller. The querying step is performed by a shopping agent program stored in the memory of the marketeer controller. It is advantageous to use a standard product identification code, such as the UPC, to perform the query.
  • [0037]
    The marketeer then derives a sale price of the good from the index price using the method specified by the seller, as shown at step 160. This is performed by a pricing agent program stored in the memory of the marketeer controller. Preferably, the method includes a discount of the index price by approximately fifty percent to determine the sale price of the seller's good. In one embodiment, the seller is presented with the sale price and asked to confirm his desire to offer the good for sale at the sale price. After the marketeer controller has derived the sale price, it stores in its memory the sale price of the good.
  • [0038]
    At this point, the good is registered with the marketeer for sale by the seller. The marketeer has not taken possession of the good. After a period of time, a buyer enters the marketeer's marketplace by reaching the marketeer's website, as shown at step 170, using his personal computer to communicate with the marketeer controller via the communications network. The buyer may browse the marketeer's website to shop for a good. Presentation of electronic storefronts, including browsing and searching abilities is well known in the art. For example, books, music, and videos may be categorized by content or genre. Alternatively, for example, a buyer interested in a particular book may search by subject, author or title, and view an image of the cover of the book, read a description or review of the book, etc. In another embodiment, a buyer could search for an item using its standard unique ID code. Any method of categorizing, cataloging or searching may be used which enables a buyer or potential buyer to find a good for which he is looking or in which he may be interested.
  • [0039]
    If the buyer is interested in the possibility of purchasing a good, the buyer expresses interest in buying the good, as shown at step 180. The buyer may do so using any suitable method, as are well known in the art. For example, a buyer may use his mouse to select a button or click a checkbox displayed on a web page and appearing on his video monitor.
  • [0040]
    The marketeer then presents the good to the buyer for sale at the sale price, as shown at step 190. This may be achieved by transmitting to the buyer data for displaying the sale price and a description of the good on the video monitor of the buyer's personal computer.
  • [0041]
    If the buyer decides to buy the good at the sale price, as shown at step 200, he may indicate his intent to do so in a manner similar to that described above with reference to expression of his interest in purchasing the good. The marketeer then facilitates the sale transaction between the buyer and the seller, as shown at step 210. This may be achieved in a variety of ways. For example, the marketeer may refer the parties to an intermediary clearinghouse or escrow agent or may itself act as the intermediary. In the preferred embodiment, the buyer transmits identification information to the marketeer controller which the marketeer controller stores in its memory and the marketeer controller then identifies the seller to the buyer and the buyer to the seller so that they may complete the sale transaction.
  • [0042]
    This arrangement works particularly well for readily identifiable, fungible, durable goods which have been pre-owned or used since the goods are readily identified by both the buyer and the seller, all goods, offer similar value to the consumer, and the fact that the good has been used does not significantly deplete the value of the good to the consumer.
  • [0043]
    In this manner, fair prices are ensured to buyers and sellers by allowing a price to be set as a function of an independent, third party vendor's price. Advantageously, the marketeer is not required to maintain an expensive inventory of goods, buyers do not have to shop tirelessly to get good values, and sellers don't have to monitor prices of similar goods. Additionally, in one embodiment, the buyer is ensured a lowest price for a good since the sale price is set using the seller-determined method at a discount from the lowest price of a seller or group of sellers of a comparable new good at the time of the sale, particularly when the index price is for a new good and the sale price is for a used good.
  • [0044]
    In one embodiment, goods in addition to those listed or registered for sale by sellers at the marketeer's website are presented by the marketeer for browsing by a buyer. Information concerning such additional goods may be retrieved from a database accessible to the marketeer controller. In one embodiment, the marketeer refers the buyer to a third party vendor if the buyer wishes to purchase the good and the good sought by the buyer is not listed for sale with the marketeer, e.g., by presenting a link to the vendor's website. In another embodiment, the seller is presented with opportunities to select a different pricing option and to thereby change the sale price or to remove the good from the marketeer's list of registered goods after registering the good for sale.
  • [0045]
    Having thus described particular embodiments of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications and improvements as are made obvious by this disclosure are intended to be part of this description though not expressly stated herein, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • [0046]
    Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only, and not limiting. The invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4613946 *7 Jun 198423 Sep 1986Forman Ernest HMethod and apparatus for generating hierarchical displays
US4799154 *15 Nov 198517 Jan 1989National Research Development CorporationArray processor apparatus
US4799156 *1 Oct 198617 Jan 1989Strategic Processing CorporationInteractive market management system
US4996642 *25 Sep 198926 Feb 1991Neonics, Inc.System and method for recommending items
US5283731 *23 Dec 19921 Feb 1994Ec CorporationComputer-based classified ad system and method
US5310997 *10 Sep 199210 May 1994Tandy CorporationAutomated order and delivery system
US5592375 *11 Mar 19947 Jan 1997Eagleview, Inc.Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
US5664111 *16 Feb 19942 Sep 1997Honicorp, Inc.Computerized, multimedia, network, real time, interactive marketing and transactional system
US5715402 *9 Nov 19953 Feb 1998Spot Metals OnlineMethod and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals
US5732400 *4 Jan 199524 Mar 1998Citibank N.A.System and method for a risk-based purchase of goods
US5749081 *6 Apr 19955 May 1998Firefly Network, Inc.System and method for recommending items to a user
US5790426 *30 Apr 19974 Aug 1998Athenium L.L.C.Automated collaborative filtering system
US5790790 *24 Oct 19964 Aug 1998Tumbleweed Software CorporationElectronic document delivery system in which notification of said electronic document is sent to a recipient thereof
US5797127 *31 Dec 199618 Aug 1998Walker Asset Management Limited PartnershipMethod, apparatus, and program for pricing, selling, and exercising options to purchase airline tickets
US5873069 *13 Oct 199516 Feb 1999American Tv & Appliance Of Madison, Inc.System and method for automatic updating and display of retail prices
US5897622 *16 Oct 199627 Apr 1999Microsoft CorporationElectronic shopping and merchandising system
US5918213 *22 Dec 199529 Jun 1999Mci Communications CorporationSystem and method for automated remote previewing and purchasing of music, video, software, and other multimedia products
US5950178 *29 Jul 19977 Sep 1999Borgato; SergioData processing system and method for facilitating transactions in diamonds
US5960407 *8 Oct 199628 Sep 1999Vivona; Robert G.Automated market price analysis system
US5960411 *12 Sep 199728 Sep 1999Amazon.Com, Inc.Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network
US6012045 *1 Jul 19974 Jan 2000Barzilai; NizanComputer-based electronic bid, auction and sale system, and a system to teach new/non-registered customers how bidding, auction purchasing works
US6016475 *8 Oct 199618 Jan 2000The Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaSystem, method, and article of manufacture for generating implicit ratings based on receiver operating curves
US6016504 *28 Aug 199618 Jan 2000Infospace.Com, Inc.Method and system for tracking the purchase of a product and services over the Internet
US6029141 *27 Jun 199722 Feb 2000Amazon.Com, Inc.Internet-based customer referral system
US6041311 *28 Jan 199721 Mar 2000Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US6047264 *8 Oct 19964 Apr 2000Onsale, Inc.Method for supplying automatic status updates using electronic mail
US6049777 *14 Mar 199711 Apr 2000Microsoft CorporationComputer-implemented collaborative filtering based method for recommending an item to a user
US6055513 *11 Mar 199825 Apr 2000Telebuyer, LlcMethods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce
US6061448 *1 Apr 19979 May 2000Tumbleweed Communications Corp.Method and system for dynamic server document encryption
US6061488 *5 Jun 19989 May 2000Auxitroc S.A.Optical cable for transferring signals in a difficult environment
US6064967 *12 Feb 199716 May 2000Speicher; Gregory J.Internet-audiotext electronic advertising system with inventory management
US6064979 *19 Nov 199616 May 2000Ipf, Inc.Method of and system for finding and serving consumer product related information over the internet using manufacturer identification numbers
US6064980 *17 Mar 199816 May 2000Amazon.Com, Inc.System and methods for collaborative recommendations
US6076070 *23 Jul 199813 Jun 2000Cendant Publishing, Inc.Apparatus and method for on-line price comparison of competitor's goods and/or services over a computer network
US6076071 *6 Jul 199813 Jun 2000Automated Business CompaniesAutomated synchronous product pricing and advertising system
US6085176 *8 Mar 19994 Jul 2000Mercexchange, LlcMethod and apparatus for using search agents to search plurality of markets for items
US6085229 *14 May 19984 Jul 2000Belarc, Inc.System and method for providing client side personalization of content of web pages and the like
US6092049 *14 Mar 199718 Jul 2000Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for efficiently recommending items using automated collaborative filtering and feature-guided automated collaborative filtering
US6101484 *31 Mar 19998 Aug 2000Mercata, Inc.Dynamic market equilibrium management system, process and article of manufacture
US6101486 *20 Apr 19988 Aug 2000Nortel Networks CorporationSystem and method for retrieving customer information at a transaction center
US6108493 *8 Oct 199622 Aug 2000Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaSystem, method, and article of manufacture for utilizing implicit ratings in collaborative filters
US6119101 *17 Jan 199712 Sep 2000Personal Agents, Inc.Intelligent agents for electronic commerce
US6119137 *30 Jan 199712 Sep 2000Tumbleweed Communications Corp.Distributed dynamic document conversion server
US6178408 *14 Jul 199923 Jan 2001Recot, Inc.Method of redeeming collectible points
US6192407 *4 Apr 199720 Feb 2001Tumbleweed Communications Corp.Private, trackable URLs for directed document delivery
US6202051 *19 Feb 199913 Mar 2001Merc Exchange LlcFacilitating internet commerce through internetworked auctions
US6243691 *29 Mar 19965 Jun 2001Onsale, Inc.Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US6246997 *26 Mar 199812 Jun 2001International Business Machines Corp.Electronic commerce site with query interface
US6266649 *18 Sep 199824 Jul 2001Amazon.Com, Inc.Collaborative recommendations using item-to-item similarity mappings
US6356879 *9 Oct 199812 Mar 2002International Business Machines CorporationContent based method for product-peer filtering
US6370513 *28 Jun 19999 Apr 2002Parasoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for automated selection, organization, and recommendation of items
US6412012 *23 Dec 199825 Jun 2002Net Perceptions, Inc.System, method, and article of manufacture for making a compatibility-aware recommendations to a user
US6415263 *14 Dec 19982 Jul 2002Ncr CorporationSystem and methods for determining and displaying product pricing
US6415264 *2 Apr 19992 Jul 2002Walker Digital, LlcSystem and method for determining a posting payment amount
US6415269 *29 May 19982 Jul 2002Bidcatcher, L.P.Interactive remote auction bidding system
US6418441 *24 Jul 20009 Jul 2002Charles G. CallMethods and apparatus for disseminating product information via the internet using universal product codes
US6606607 *17 Jun 199912 Aug 2003Mcj Ventures, Inc.Individualized, real-time, interactive e-commerce auction
US6691914 *4 Oct 200117 Feb 2004Airclic, Inc.Method and system for directing end user to network location of provider based on user-provided codes
US6772150 *22 Mar 20003 Aug 2004Amazon.Com, Inc.Search query refinement using related search phrases
US6785671 *17 Mar 200031 Aug 2004Amazon.Com, Inc.System and method for locating web-based product offerings
US6853982 *29 Mar 20018 Feb 2005Amazon.Com, Inc.Content personalization based on actions performed during a current browsing session
US6865546 *19 Apr 20008 Mar 2005Amazon.Com, Inc.Methods and systems of assisting users in purchasing items
US7330826 *9 Jul 199912 Feb 2008Perfect.Com, Inc.Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet
US7346559 *14 Feb 200118 Mar 2008International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for automating association of retail items to support shopping proposals
US7373317 *27 Oct 199913 May 2008Ebay, Inc.Method and apparatus for facilitating sales of goods by independent parties
US7644366 *30 Jul 19995 Jan 2010Computer Associates Think, Inc.Method and system for displaying a plurality of discrete files in a compound file
US7689469 *14 Aug 200630 Mar 2010Ewinwin, Inc.E-commerce volume pricing
US7693748 *24 Jan 20036 Apr 2010Ewinwin, Inc.Method and system for configuring a set of information including a price and volume schedule for a product
US7702534 *21 Aug 200020 Apr 2010Ricoh Elemex CorporationMerchandise planning and development system and method for the same, and a computer product
US7740172 *28 Nov 200622 Jun 2010Amazon Technologies, Inc.Methods and systems for managing price and inventory adjustments
US7983953 *14 Sep 201019 Jul 2011Ebay Inc.Method and apparatus for listing goods for sale
US20020022994 *14 Feb 200121 Feb 2002Miller Michael RobertSystem, method and article of manufacture for generating a personal web page/web site based on user-input bar code information
US20020026386 *13 Jun 200128 Feb 2002Walden John C.Personalized storage folder & associated site-within-a-site web site
US20020052873 *23 Jul 20012 May 2002Joaquin DelgadoSystem and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US20020055890 *21 May 20019 May 2002Foley Thomas AquinasRecommendation information providing method, recommendation information transmission system, recommendation information transmission apparatus and computer memory product
US20020062268 *20 Nov 200123 May 2002Motoi SatoScheme for presenting recommended items through network based on access log and user preference
US20020065877 *30 Nov 200030 May 2002John KowtkoMethods and systems for creating and sharing customized web sites and portals
US20020099629 *18 Jan 200225 Jul 2002Motoi SatoScheme for presenting recommended items through network using client preference estimating factor information
US20020103692 *28 Dec 20001 Aug 2002Rosenberg Sandra H.Method and system for adaptive product recommendations based on multiple rating scales
US20030028427 *2 Aug 20016 Feb 2003International Business Machines CorporationUser control of electronic personal information while browsing the Web
US20030037041 *1 Oct 200220 Feb 2003Pinpoint IncorporatedSystem for automatic determination of customized prices and promotions
US20030051240 *10 Sep 200113 Mar 2003Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Four-way recommendation method and system including collaborative filtering
US20030069740 *9 Oct 200110 Apr 2003Zeidman Robert MarcApparatus and method for providing history data to sellers about internet auctions and marketplaces
US20030084450 *11 Oct 20021 May 2003Thurston Nathaniel J.Method and system for presenting personalized television program recommendation to viewers
US20030093331 *13 Nov 200115 May 2003International Business Machines CorporationInternet strategic brand weighting factor
US20030093793 *13 Nov 200115 May 2003Koninklijke Philips Electornics N.V.Method and apparatus for recommending items of interest to a user based on recommendations for one or more third parties
US20030105682 *7 Oct 20025 Jun 2003Dicker Russell A.User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US20030110056 *29 Oct 200212 Jun 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod for rating items within a recommendation system based on additional knowledge of item relationships
US20030131070 *27 Sep 200210 Jul 2003International Business Machines CorporationCustomization of information from web sites
US20030145326 *31 Jan 200231 Jul 2003Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Subscription to TV channels/shows based on recommendation generated by a TV recommender
US20040039657 *20 Jun 200326 Feb 2004Behrens Clifford A.Automatic recommendation of products using latent semantic indexing of content
US20040078214 *18 Sep 200322 Apr 2004Speiser Leonard RobertProduct recommendation in a network-based commerce system
US20040143450 *7 Jan 200422 Jul 2004Iproperty.Com., Inc.Real estate transaction management system
US20050028207 *25 Aug 20043 Feb 2005Finseth Craig A.Method and apparatus for sharing viewing preferences
US20050038717 *13 Aug 200317 Feb 2005Mcqueen Clyde D.Personalized selection and display of user-supplied content to enhance browsing of electronic catalogs
US20050038733 *17 Sep 200417 Feb 2005Foster Benjamin DavidSeller configurable merchandising in an electronic marketplace
US20050055713 *9 Sep 200410 Mar 2005Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus and method for sharing recommended programs using digital set-top boxes
US20110004535 *14 Sep 20106 Jan 2011Ebay Inc.Method and Apparatus For Listing Goods For Sale
US20110178898 *4 Apr 201121 Jul 2011Ebay Inc.Method and apparatus for presenting information relating to a good
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8082183 *26 Mar 200720 Dec 2011Manish ChowdharyOptimizing a business transaction between a selling vendor and a shipping vendor
US8239289 *4 Jun 20097 Aug 2012Kris LandInter-gallery trading system for artworks
US834662221 Apr 20091 Jan 2013Ebay Inc.Connection system
US869438915 Mar 20138 Apr 2014Formula Labs, LlcSystem for optimization of business transactions between a selling vendor and a shipping vendor
US931469730 Sep 201319 Apr 2016Blue Calypso, LlcSystem and method for advertising distribution through mobile social gaming
US976085415 Mar 201312 Sep 2017Formula Labs, LlcSystem and method for identifying and co-ordinating an alternate delivery of one or more selected items
US981498518 Apr 201614 Nov 2017Blue Calypso, LlcSystem and method for advertising distribution through mobile social gaming
US20070250398 *26 Mar 200725 Oct 2007Manish ChowdharyAutomated Transaction Coordinator
US20100211473 *21 Apr 200919 Aug 2010Naresh ShettyConnection System
US20100312671 *4 Jun 20099 Dec 2010Finarta Usa, Inc.Inter-gallery trading system for artworks
Classifications
U.S. Classification705/26.43, 705/400, 705/27.1, 705/26.62, 705/26.64
International ClassificationG06Q30/06, G06Q30/02
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q30/0617, G06Q30/0623, G06Q30/0601, G06Q30/0641, G06Q30/0619, G06Q30/0625, G06Q30/0207, G06Q30/0629, G06Q30/0283, G06Q30/0643, G06Q30/0613, G06Q30/02
European ClassificationG06Q30/02, G06Q30/0641, G06Q30/0629, G06Q30/0601, G06Q30/0623, G06Q30/0613, G06Q30/0643, G06Q30/0625, G06Q30/0619, G06Q30/0207, G06Q30/0617, G06Q30/0283
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
24 Feb 2015ASAssignment
Owner name: EBAY INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HALF.COM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:035015/0485
Effective date: 20040430