CA2351595A1 - System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing - Google Patents
System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2351595A1 CA2351595A1 CA 2351595 CA2351595A CA2351595A1 CA 2351595 A1 CA2351595 A1 CA 2351595A1 CA 2351595 CA2351595 CA 2351595 CA 2351595 A CA2351595 A CA 2351595A CA 2351595 A1 CA2351595 A1 CA 2351595A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- price
- total
- data set
- buyer
- quote
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2457—Query processing with adaptation to user needs
- G06F16/24575—Query processing with adaptation to user needs using context
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2457—Query processing with adaptation to user needs
- G06F16/24578—Query processing with adaptation to user needs using ranking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/248—Presentation of query results
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/951—Indexing; Web crawling techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F7/00—Methods or arrangements for processing data by operating upon the order or content of the data handled
- G06F7/06—Arrangements for sorting, selecting, merging, or comparing data on individual record carriers
- G06F7/08—Sorting, i.e. grouping record carriers in numerical or other ordered sequence according to the classification of at least some of the information they carry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/08—Payment architectures
- G06Q20/10—Payment architectures specially adapted for electronic funds transfer [EFT] systems; specially adapted for home banking systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/08—Payment architectures
- G06Q20/20—Point-of-sale [POS] network systems
- G06Q20/201—Price look-up processing, e.g. updating
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0204—Market segmentation
- G06Q30/0205—Location or geographical consideration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0206—Price or cost determination based on market factors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0283—Price estimation or determination
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/04—Billing or invoicing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0603—Catalogue ordering
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0611—Request for offers or quotes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0623—Item investigation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0623—Item investigation
- G06Q30/0625—Directed, with specific intent or strategy
- G06Q30/0629—Directed, with specific intent or strategy for generating comparisons
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/08—Insurance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/12—Accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/16—Real estate
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services; Handling legal documents
- G06Q50/188—Electronic negotiation
Abstract
A method and system for managing and evaluating commodities purchasing over a network of distributed computing devices. In one embodiment, the method allows a plurality of buyers to generate one request for quote and, response to the request for quote, receive a quote from plurality of vendors. The system of the present invention provides a price normalization routine that allows buyers to evaluate and compare a normalized price for commodity products having different evaluation parameters. In an arrangement comprising a plurality of computers connected to a network said plurality of computers including at least one server, at least one buyer client computer and a plurality of seller client computers, the method for providing commodities exchange services first provides a web-based browsable display describing at least one commodities exchange service. The system then receives at least one request for quote from the buyer. The system then receives at least one quote from different sellers, wherein each quote may have a different price and quantity listed. The system then compares to one or more selected metrics and normalizes the prices received from the different quotes, thus, allowing the buyer to readily compare the prices of a number of commodity items having inherently different values. In one embodiment, the system of the present invention also provides a method for multi-value cross compilation of sales transactions, iterative quote information, and metric data for purposes of evaluation and strategy analysis.
Description
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING .AND EVALUATING
NETWORK COMMODITIES PURCHASING
Field of the Invention This invention generally relates to electronic commerce software applications and, more particularly, to a method and system relating; to commodities purchasing over a network of distributed computing devices.
Background of the Invention Commodity items such as lumber, agricultural products, metals, and livestock/meat are usually traded in the open market between a number of buyers and sellers. The sales transactions of most commodity items involve a number of parameters. For instance, in the trade of commodity lumber, a buyer usually orders materials by specifying parameters such as lumber species, grade, size (i.e.
2x4, 2x10, etc.) and length, as well as the "tally" or mix of mzits of various lengths within shipment, method of transportation (i.e., rail or truck), shipping terms (i.e., FOB or delivered), and desired date of receipt, with each parameter influencing the value of the commodity purchase. Given the multiple possible combinations of factors, a commodity buyer often finds it difficult to objectively .compare similar but unequal offerings among competing vendors.
For example, in a case where a lumber buyer desires to order a railcar load of spruce (SPF) Zx4's of #2 & Better grade, the buyer would query vendors offering matching specie and grade carloads seeking the best match for the buyer's need or tally preference at the lowest market price. Lumber carloads are quoted at a price per thousand board feet for all material on the railcar. In a market where the shipping parameters are not identical, it is very difficult for buyers to determine the comparative value of unequal offerings.
Typically a lumber buyer will find multiple vendors each having different offerings available. For example, a railcar of SPF 2x4's may be quoted at rate of $300 / MBF (thousand board feet) by multiple vendors. Even though MBF price is equal, one vendor's carload may represent significantly greater marketplace value because it contains the more desirable lengths of 2x4's, such as builder preferred sixteen foot 2x4's. When the offering price varies in addition to the mix of lengths, it becomes increasingly difficult to compare quotes from various vendors.
Further, because construction projects often require long lead times, the lumber product may need to be priced now, but not delivered until a time in the future.
Alternately, another specie of lumber (i.e. southern pine) may represent an acceptable substitute.
Therefore, from the foregoing, there is a need for a method and system that allows buyers to evaluate the price of commodity offerings possessing varying shipping parameters.
Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a system and method for managing and evaluating commodities purchasing over a network of distributed computing devices.
In one embodiment, the method allows a plurality of buyers to generate one request for quote and, in response to the request for quote, receive a quote from plurality of vendors. The system of the present invention provides a price normalization routine that allows buyers to evaluate and compare a normalized price for commodity products having different evaluation parameters. In an arrangement comprising a plurality of computers connected to a network, said plurality of computers including:
at least one server; at least one buyer client computer; and a plurality of seller client computers, the method for providing commodities exchange services first provides a web-based browsable display describing at least one commodities exchange service.
The system then receives at least one request for quote (RFQ) from the buyer.
Responsive to the RFQ, the system then receives at least one quote from different sellers, where each quote may have a different price and quantity listed. The system then normalizes the prices received from the different quotes by applying a metric factor to the quote to produce an adjusted price. The adjusted price then allows the buyer to readily compare the prices of a number of commodity items having inherently different values to an objective measure. In addition, the system tracks all transactional activity and provides a cross compilation tool for evaluation and analysis.
Brief Description of the Drawings The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 is a block diagram of a prior art representative portion of the Internet.
FIGURE 2 is a pictorial diagram of a system of devices connected to the Internet, which depict the travel route of data in accordance with the present invention.
FIGURE 3 is a block diagram of the several components of the buyer's computer shown in FIGURE 2 that is used to request information on a particular route ~n accordance with the present invention.
FIGURE 4 is a block diagram of the several components of an information server shown in FIGURE 2 that is used to supply information on a particular route in accordance with the present invention.
FIGURE 5 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic of a routine used by the information server to receive and process the buyer's actions.
FIGURES 6A-6B are flow diagrams illustrating another embodiment of the logic used by the information server to receive and process the quotes and quote requests of both buyers and vendors.
FIGURE 7 is a flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of the logic used by the information server to execute the process of .a catalog purchase.
FIGURES 8A-8D are images of windows produced by a Web browser application installed on a client computer accessing a server illustrating one embodiment of the present invention.
FIGURE 9 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the normalization process in accordance with the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment The term "Internet" refers to the collection of networks and routers that use the Internet Protocol (IP) to communicate with one another. A representative section of the Internet 100 as known in the prior art is shown in FIGURE 1 in which a plurality of local area networks (LANs) 120 and a wide <~rea network (WAN) 110 are interconnected by routers 125. The routers 125 are; generally special purpose computers used to interface one LAN or WAN to another. Communication links within the LANs may be twisted wire pair, or coaxial cable, while communication links between networks may utilize 56 Kbps analog telephone lines, or 1 Mbps digital T-1 lines and/or 45 Mbps T-3 lines. Further computers and other related electronic devices can be remotely connected to either the LANs 120 or the WAN 110 via a modem and temporary telephone link. Such computers and electronic devices 130 are shown in FIGURE 1 as connected to one of the LANs via dotted lines. It will be appreciated that the Internet comprises a vast number of such interconnected networks, computers, and routers and that only a small, representative section of the Internet 100 is shown in FIGURE 1.
The World Wide Web (WWW), on the other hand, is vast collection of interconnected, electronically stored information located on servers connected throughout the Internet 100. Many companies are now providing services and access to their content over the Internet 100 using the WW'JV. In accordance with the present invention and as shown in FIGURE 2, there may be a plurality of buyers operating a plurality of client computing devices 235. FIGURE 2 generally shows a system 200 of computers and devices to which an information server 230 is connected and to which the buyers' computers 235 are also connected. Also connected to the Internet 100, is a plurality of computing devices 250 associated with a plurality of sellers. The system 200 also includes a communications program, referred to as CEA, which is used on seller's computing devices 250 to create a communication means between the seller's backend office software and the server application.
The buyers of a market commodity may, through their computers 235, request information about a plurality of items or order over the Internet 100 via a Web browser installed on the buyers' computers. Responsive to such requests, the information server 230, also referred to as a server 230, rnay combine the first buyer's information with information from other buyers on other computing devices 235.
The server 230 then transmits the combined buyer data to the respective computing devices 250 associated with the plurality of buyers. Details of this process are described in more detail below in association with FIGURES 5-7.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate l:hat in other embodiments of the present invention, the capabilities of the server 230 and/or the client computing devices 235 and 250 may all be embodied in the other configurations.
Consequently, it would be appreciated that in these embodiments, the server 230 could be located on any computing device associated with the buyer or seller's computing devices.
Additionally, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that while only four buyer computing devices 235, four seller computing devices 250, and one server are depicted in FIGURE 2, numerous configurations involving a vast number of buyer and seller computing devices and a plurality of servers 230, equipped with the hardware and software components described below, may be connected to the Internet 100.
FIGURE 3 depicts several of the key components of the buyer's client computing device 235. As known in the art, client computing devices 235 are also referred to as "clients" or "devices," and client computing devices 23 5 also include other devices such as palm computing devices, cellular telephones, or other like forms of electronics. A client computing device can also be the same computing device as the server 230. An "agent" can be a person, server, or a client computing device 235 having software configured to assist the buyer in making purchasing decisions based on one or more buyer determined parameters. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the buyers' computer 235 in actual practice will include many more components than those shown in FIGURE 3. However, it is not necessary that all of these generally conventional components be shown in order to disclose an illustrative embodiment for practicing the present invention. As shown in FIGURE 3, the buyer's computer includes a network interface 315 for connecting to the Internet 100. Those of ordinary skill in the art will. appreciate that the network interface 315 includes the necessary circuitry for such a connection, and is also constructed for use with the TCP/IP protocol.
The buyers' computer 235 also includes a processing unit 305, a display 310, and a memory 300 all interconnected along with the network interface 315 via a bus 360. The memory 300 generally comprises a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM) and a permanent mass storage device, such as a disk drive.
The memory 300 stores the program code necessary for oequesting and/or depicting a desired route over the Internet 100 in accordance with l:he present invention.
More specifically, the memory 300 stores a Web browser 330, such as Netscape's NAVIGATOR or Microsoft's INTERNET EXPLORER browsers, used in accordance with the present invention for depicting a desired route over the Internet 100. In addition, memory 300 also stores an operating system 320 and a communications application 325. It will be appreciated that these software components may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory 300 of the buyers' computer 235 using a drive mechanism associated with the computer-readable medium, such as a floppy, tape or CD-ROM drive.
As will be described in more detail below, the user interface which allows products to be ordered by the buyers are supplied b~y a remote server, i.e., the information server 230 located elsewhere on the Internet as illustrated in FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 4 depicts several of the key components of the information server 230.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate thal; the information server 230 includes many more components than shown in FIG~JRE 4. However, it is not necessary that all of these generally conventional components be shown in order to disclose an illustrative embodiment for practicing the present invention. As shown in FIGURE 4, the information server 230 is connected to the Internet 100 via a network interface 410. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the network interface 410 includes the necessary circuitry for connecting the information server 230 to the Internet 100, and is constructed for use with the TCP/IP
protocol.
The information server 230 also includes a processing unit 415, a display 440, and a mass memory 450 all interconnected along with the network interface 410 via a bus 460. The mass memory 450 generally comprises a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), and a permanent mass storage device, such as a hard disk drive, tape drive, optical drive, floppy disk drive, or combination thereof.
The mass memory 450 stores the program code and data necessary for incident and route analysis as well as supplying the results of that analysis to consumers in accordance with the present invention. More specifically, the mass memory 450 stores a metrics application 425 formed in accordance with the present invention for managing the purchase forums of commodities products. In addition, mass memory 450 stores a database 445 of buyer information: continuously logged by the information server 230 for statistical market analysis. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the database 445 of product and buyer information may also be stored on other servers or storage devices connected to the either the information server 230 or the Internet 100. Finally, mass memory 450 stores Web server software 430 for handling requests for stored information received via the Internet 100 and the WWW, and an operating system 420. It will be appreciated that the aforementioned software components may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into mass memory 450 of the information server 230 using a drive mechanism associated with the computer-readable medium, such as floppy, tape or CD-ROM drive. In addition, the data stored in the mass memory 450 and other memory can be "exposed" to other computers or persons for purposes of communicating data. Thus, "exposing" data from a computing device could mean transmitting data to another device or person, transferring XML data packets, transferring data within the same computer, or other like forms of data communications.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, FIGURE 5 is a flow chart illustrating the logic implemented for the creation of a Request for Quote (RFQ) by a singular buyer or a pool of buyers. In process of FIGURE 5, also referred to as the pooling process 500, a buyer or a pool of buyers generate an RFQ
which is displayed or transmitted to a plurality of sellers. Responsive to receiving the RFQ, the sellers then send quotes to the buyers.
In summary, the creation of the RFQ consists of at least one buyer initially entering general user identification information to initiate the process. The buyer would then define a Line Item on a Web page displaying an RFQ form. The Line Item is defined per industry specification and units of product are grouped as a "tally"
per industry practice. The pooling process 500 allows buyers to combine RFQ
Line Items with other buyers with like needs. In one embodiment, the pool buy feature is created by a graphical user interface where the RFQ Line Items from a plurality of buyers is displayed on a Web page to one of the pool buyers, referred to as the pool administrator. The server 230 also provides a Web-based feature allowing the pool administrator to selectively add each RFQ Line Item to one combined RFQ. The combined RFQ is then sent to at least one vendor or seller. This feature provides a forum for pooling the orders of many buyers, which allows individual entities or divisions of larger companies to advantageously bid for larger orders, thus providing them with more bidding power and the possibility of gaining a lower price.
The pooling process 500 begins in a step 501 where a buyer initiates the process by providing buyer purchase data. In step 501, the buyer accesses a Web page transmitted from the server 230 configured to receive the buyer purchase data, also referred to as the product specification data set o~r the Line Item data.
One exemplary Web page for the logic of step 501 is depicted in FIGURE 8A. As shown in FIGURE 8A, the buyer enters the Line Item data specifications in the fields of the Web page. The Line Item data consists of lumber species and grade 803, number of pieces per unit 804, quantities of the various unit<.~ comprising the preferred assortment in the tally 805A-E, delivery method 806, delivery date 807, delivery _g_ location 808, and the overall quantity 809. In one embodiment, the buyer must define the delivery date as either contemporaneous "on-or-before" delivery date, or specify a delivery date in the future for a "Forward Price" RFQ. In addition, the buyer selects a metric or multiple metrics in a field 810 per RFQ Line Item (tally).
As described in more detail below, the metric provides pricing data that is used as a reference point for the buyer to compare the various quotes returned from the sellers.
The buyer RFQ Line Item data is then stored in the memory of the server 230.
Returning to FIGURE 5, at a next step 503, the server 230 determines if the buyer is going to participate in a pool buy. In the process of decision block 503, the server 230 provides an option in a Web page that allows the buyer to post their Line Item data to a vendor or post their Line Item data to a buyer pool. The window illustrated in FIGURE 8A is one exemplary Web page illustrating these options for a buyer. As shown in FIGURE 8A, the links "Post Buyer Pool" 812 and "Post to Vendors" 814 are provided on the RFQ Web page.
At a step 503, if the buyer does not elect to participate in a pool buy, the process continues to a step 513 where the server 230 generates a request for a quote (RFQ) from the buyer's Line Item data. A detailed description of how the server 230 generates a request for a quote (RFQ) is summarized below and referred to as the purchase order process 600A depicted in FIGURE 6A.
Alternatively at the decision block 503, if the buyer elects to participate in a pool buy, the process continues to a step 505 where the system notifies other buyers logged into the server 230 that an RFQ is available in a. pool, allowing other buyers to add additional Line Items (tallies) to the RFQ. In this part of the process, the Line Items from each buyer are received by and stored in the server memory. The Line Items provided by each buyer in the pool are received by the server 230 using the same process as described above with reference to block 501 and the Web page of FIGURE 8A. All of the Line Items stored on the server 230 are then displayed to a pool administrator via a Web page or an email message. In one embodiment, the pool administrator is one of the buyers in a pool, where the pool administrator has the capability to select all of the Line Item data to generate a combined RFQ. The server 230 provides the pool administrator with this capability by the use of any Web-based communicative device, such as email or HTML forms. As part of the process, as shown in steps 507 and 509, the pool may be left open fmr a predetermined period of time to allow additional buyers to add purchase data to the current RFQ.
At a decision block 509, the server 230 determines if the pool administrator has closed the pool. The logic of this step 509 is executed when the server receives the combined RFQ data from the pool administrator. The pool administrator can send the combined RFQ data to the server 230 via an HTML farm or by other electronic messaging means such as email or URL strings. Once the server 230 has determined that the pool is closed, the process continues to block 510 where the Line Items from each buyer (the combined RFQ) is sent to all of the buyers in the pool.
The process then continues to the step 513 where the server 230 sends the combined RFQ to the vendors or sellers.
Referring now to FIGURE 6A, one embodiment of the purchase-negotiation process 600 is disclosed. The purchase-negotiation process 600 is also referred to as an solicited offer process or the market purchase proces<.~. In summary, the purchase-negotiation process 600 allows at least one buyer to submit an RFQ and then view quotes from a plurality of vendors and purchase items from selected vendor(s).
The logic of FIGURE 6A provides buyers with a forum that automatically manages, collects and normalizes the price of desired commodity items. The purchase-negotiation process 600 calculates a normalized price data set that is based on a predefined metric(s). The calculation of the normalized price data set in combination with the format of the Web pages described herein create an integrated forum where quotes for a plurality of inherently dissimilar products can be easily obtained and compared.
The purchase-negotiation process 600 begins at a~ step 601 where the RFQ, as generated by one buyer or a pool of buyers in the process depicted in FIGURE
5, is sent to a plurality of computing devices 250 associated with a plurality of sellers or vendors. The vendors receive the RFQ via a web page transmitted by the server 230.
In one embodiment, the vendors receive an email message having a hypertext link to the RFQ Web page to provide notice the vendor. Responsive to the information in the buyers' RFQ, the process then continues to a step 603 where at least one vendor sends their quote information to the server 230.
In the process of step 603, the vendors respond to the RFQ by sending their price quote to the server 230 for display via a Web pagf; to the buyer or buyer pool.
Generally described, the vendors send an HTML form or an email message with a price and description of the order. The description of the order in the quote message contains the same order information as the RFQ.
FIGURE 8B illustrates one exemplary Web page of a vendor quote that is displayed to the buyer. As shown in FIGURE 8B, th.e vendor quote includes the vendor's price 813, the lumber species and grade 803, number of pieces per unit 804, quantities of the various units comprising the preferred assortment in the tally 805A-E, delivery method 806, delivery date 807, and delivery location 808. In the quote response message, the vendor has the capability to modify any of the information that was submitted in the RFQ. For example, the vendor may edit the quantity values for the various units comprising the preferred assortment in the tally 805A-E. This allows the vendor to adjust the buyer's request according to the vendor's inventory, best means of transportation, etc. All of the vendor's quote information is referred to as price data set or the RFQ Line Item (tally) quote.
Returning to FIGURE 6A, the process continues to a step 605, where the server 230 normalizes the price of each RFQ Line Item (tally) quote from each vendor. The normalization of the vendor's price is a computation that adjusts the vendor's price utilizing data from a metric. The normalization process is carried out because each vendor may respond to the Line Items of an RFQ by quoting products that are different from buyer's RFQ and/or have a different tally configuration. The normalization of the pricing allows the buyers to objectively compare the relative value of the different products offered by the plurality of vendors. For example, one vendor may produce a quote for an RFQ of: one unit of 2x4x12, two units of 2x4x12, and three units of 2x4x 16. At the same time, another vendor may submit a quote for three units of 2x4x 12, one unit of 2x4x 12, and two units of 2x4x 16. Even though there is some difference between these two offerings, thE; price normalization process provides a means for the buyer to effectively compare and evaluate the different quotes even though there are variations in the products. The price normalization process 900 is described in more detail below in conjunction with the flow diagram of FIGURE 9.
Returning again to FIGURE 6A, at a step 607 the vendor's quote information is communicated to the buyer's computer for display. As shown in FIGURE 8B and described in detail above, the vendor's quote is displayed via a Web page that communicates the vendor's quote price 813 and other purchase information. In addition, the vendor's quote page contains a metric price 815 and a quote price vs.
metric price ratio 816. The metric price 815 and the quote price vs. metric price ratio 816 are also referred to as a normalized price data value.
Next, at a step 609, the buyer or the administrator of the buyer pool, compares the various products and prices quoted by the vendors along with the normalized price for each Line Item on the RFQ. In this part of the process, the buyer may decide to purchase one of the products from a particular vendor and sends a notification to the selected vendor indicating the sanne. The buyer notifies the selected vendor by the use of an electronic means via the server 230, such as an HTML form, a chat window, email, etc. For example, the quote Web page depicted in FIGURE 8B shows two different quotes with two different tallies, the first quote price 813 of $360, and the second quote price 813A of $320. If the buyer determines that they prefer to purchase the materials listed in the first quote, the buyer selects the "Buy!" hyperlink 820 or 820A associated with the desired tally.
If the buyer is not satisfied with any of thc~ listed vendor quotes, the server 230 allows the buyer to further negotiate with one or more of the vendors to obtain a new quote. This step is shown in decision block 61 l, where the buyer makes the determination to either accept a quoted price or proceed to a step where they negotiate with the vendor to obtain another quote or present a counter offer. Here, the server 230 provides a graphical user interface configured to allow the buyer and one vendor to electronically communicate, such as a chat window, streaming voice communications or other standard methods of communication.
There are many forms of electronic communications known in the art that can be used to allow the buyer and vendors to communicate.
The buyer and seller negotiate various quotes andl iterate through several steps 603-613 directed by the server 230, where each quote is normalized, compared and further negotiated until quote is accepted by the buyer or negotiations cease.
While the buyer and seller negotiate the various quotes, the server 230 stores each quote until the two parties agree on a price. At any step during; the negotiation process, the system always presents the buyer with an option to terminate the negotiation if dissatisfied with the quote(s).
At decision block 611, when a buyer agrees on a quoted price, the process then continues to a step 615 where the buyer sends a notification message to the vendor indicating they have accepted a quote. As described above with reference to steps 603-613, the buyer notification message of step 615 may be in the form of a message on a chat window, email, by an HTML form., or the like. However, the buyer notification must be transmitted in a format that allows the system to record the transaction. The buyer notification may include all .of the information regarding the specifications by RFQ Line Item, such as, but not limited to, the buy price, date and method of shipment, and payment terms.
The purchase-negotiation process ,600 is then finalized when the system, as shown in a step 617, sends a confirmation message to a tracking system. The confirmation message includes all of the information related to the agreed sales transaction.
Optionally, the process includes a step 619, where the server 230 stores all of the information related to RFQ, offers, and the final sales transaction in a historical database. This would allow the server 230 to use all of the transaction information in an analysis process for providing an improved method of obtaining a lower market price in future transactions and in identifying optimum purchasing strategy.
The analysis process is described in further detail below. Although the illustrated embodiment is configured to store the data related to the sales transactions, the system can also be configured to store all of the iterative quote information exchanged between the buyer and vendor.
Referring now to FIGURE 6B, an embodiment of the unsolicited offer process 650 is disclosed. In summary, the unsolicited offer process 650, also referred to as the unsolicited market purchase process, allows at least one buyer to view unsolicited offers from a plurality of vendors and purchase items from a plurality of vendors from the offers. The logic of FIGURE 6B provides buyers with a forum that automatically manages, collects and normalizes price quotes based on metric data.
By the price normalization method of FIGURE 6B, the server 230 creates an integrated forum where offers from a plurality of inherf;ntly dissimilar products can be obtained and normalized for determination of purchase.
The unsolicited offer process 650 begins at a step 651 where the plurality of vendors are able to submit offers to the server 230. This part of the process is executed in manner similar to step 603 of FIGURE 6A, where the vendor submits a quote to the server 230. However, in the Web page of step 651, the server 230 generates a Web page containing several tallies from :many different vendors.
In addition, at step 651, the server 230 stores all of the unsolicited offer data provided by the vendors.
Next, at a step 653, a buyer views the offers stored on the server 230. This part of the process is carried out in a manner similar to the process of step 603 or 607 where the server 230 displays a plurality of offers similar to the tallies depicted in FIGURE 8A.
Next, at a step 655, the buyer selects a metric for the calculation of the normalized price associated with the selected offer. As described in more detail below, metrics may come from publicly available info~:mation, i.e., price of futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, subscription services such as CrowesTM or Random LengthsTM, or internally generated metrics derived from the data stored in the server 230. The normalization calcula~ti~n_ c,therwl~P
YPfP,-rP~ tn ae the normalization process, occurs each time the buyer views a different offer, and the normalization calculation uses the most current metric data for each calculation. The normalization process is carried out because each vendor will most likely offer products that may vary from products of other vendors, and have a different tally configuration from those supplied by other vendors. The: normalization of the pricing allows the buyers to compare the relative value of the different products offered by the number of vendors. The metric price for each selected offer is displayed in a similar manner as the metric price 815 and 816 shown in the Web page of FIGURE 8B.
Next, at decision block 657, the buyer selects at least one offer for purchase.
This is similar to the process of FIGURE 6A in that t;he buyer selects the "Buy!"
hyperlink 820 associated with the desired tally to purchase an order. The process then continues to steps 659-663, where at step 659 the process transmits a buy notice to the vendor, then at step 661 sends a purchase confirmation to the tracking system, and then at step 663 saves the transaction data in the server database. The steps 659-663 are carried out in the same manner as the steps 615-619 of FIGURE 6A.
In the above-described process, the buyer notification. may include all of the information regarding the specifications by RFQ Line Item, and data such as, but not limited to, the buy price, date and method of shipment, and the payment terms.
Referring now to FIGURE 7, a flow diagram illustrating yet another embodiment of the present invention is shown. FIGURE 7 illustrates the catalog purchase process 700. This embodiment allows buyers to search for a catalog price of desired commerce items, enter their purchase data based on the pre-negotiated catalog prices, and to compare those catalog prices with a selected metric price and the current market price, wherein the current market price is determined by the purchase-negotiation process 600.
The process starts at a step 701 where the buyer selects a program catalog.
The program catalog provides buyers with the published or pre-negotiated price of the desired products. Next, at a step 703, based on the catalog information, the buyer then enters their purchase data. Similar to the step SO:I of FIGURE 5 and the tally shown in FIGURE 8A, the buyer sends purchase data to the server 230, such as the desired quantity of each item and the lumber species, grade, etc.
The process then proceeds to decision block 707 where the buyer makes a determination of whether to purchase the items using the catalog price, or purchase the desired product in the open market. Here, the server 230 allows the user to make this determination by displaying the metric price of each catalog price. This format is similar to the metric price 815 and 816 displayed in FIGURE 8B.
At decision block 707, if the buyer determines that the catalog price is better than a selected metric price, the process then proceeds to steps 709, 711, and 713, where a program buy from the catalog is executed, and the buyer's purchase information is stored on the server 230 and sent to the vendor's system to confirm the sale. These steps 711-713 axe carried out in the same mlnner as the confirmation and save steps 617 and 619 as shown in FIGURE 6A.
At decision block 707, if the buyer determines that the metric price is better than the catalog price, the process continues to a step 717 where the buyers purchase data is entered into an RFQ. At this step, the process carries out the first five steps 601-609 of the method of FIGURE 6A to provide buyers with the price data from the open market, as well as provide the normalized. prices for each open market quote. At a step 719, the server 230 then displays a web page that allows the user to select from a purchase option of a catalog or spot (market) purchase. At decision block 721, based on the displayed information, the buyer will then have an opportunity to make a determination of whether they will proceed with a catalog purchase or an open market purchase.
At decision block 721, if the buyer proceeds with the catalog purchase, the process continues to step 709 where the catalog purchase is executed. The steps 709-713 used to carry out the catalog purchase are the same as if the buyer had selected the catalog purchase in step 707. However, if at decision block 721 the buyer selects the option to proceed with the market purchase, the process continues to a step 723 where the RFQ generated in step 717 is sent to the vendor. Here, the process carries out the steps of FIGURE 6 to complete the open market purchase. More specifically, the process continues to step 609 where the buyer corr~pares the normalized prices from each vendor. Once a vendor is selected, the negotiation process of steps 613 is carried out until the buyer decides to execute the purchase. Next, the transaction steps 615-619 are carried out to confirm the purchase, notify the tracking system, and save the transactional data on the historical database.
Optionally, the process can include a step where the server 230 stores all of the information related to program buy and metric comparisons, and the final sales transaction in a historical database. This would allow the server 230 to use all of the transaction information in an analysis process for providing an improved method of obtaining the value of the program. Although the illustrated embodiment is configured to store the data related to the sales transactions, the system can also be configured to store all of the iterative quote information exchanged between the buyer and vendor.
The analysis process allows the server 230 to utiilize the sales history records stored in steps 619 and 711 to generate price reports for various third parties as well as provide a means of calculating current market prices for products sold in the above-described methods. The sales history records are also used as the source for a metric such as those used in the process of FIGURES EiA, 6B, and 7. As shown in steps 619, 663, and 71 l, the server 230 continually updates the historical database for each sales transaction. The analysis reporting process allows a buyer or manager of buyers to conduct analysis on the historical information. This analysis would include multi-value cross compilation, for purposes of deterrriining purchasing strategies, buyer effectiveness, program performance, vendor performance, and measuring effectiveness of forward pricing as a risk management sty.°ategy.
Referring now to FIGURE 9, a flow diagram illustrating the logic of the normalization process 900 is shown. The logic of the normalization process 900 resides on the server 230 and processes the quotes received from commodity sellers.
The logic begins in at a step 905 where quote data is obtained from the seller in response to the buyer's RFQ as described above.
Next, at a step 910, routine 900 iteratively calculates the board footage (BF) of each type of lumber. Once all the totals are calculated for each type, routine 900 continues to a step 915 where the server 230 calculates the total type price.
At step 915, routine 900 iteratively calculates the total type price for the amount of each type of lumber specified in the quote. The is accomplished by taking the total board footage (BF), calculated in block 910 anal multiplying the total BF by the price per MBF specified in the quote. Once all the prices are calculated for each type, routine 900 continues to a step 920 where the server 230 calculates total quoted price. At step 920 the routine 900 calculates the total price for the quote by summing all the total type prices calculated at step 915.
At a step 925, routine 900 iteratively retrieves th.e most current price for each type of lumber specified in the quote from a predefined metric source(s).
Metrics may come from publicly available information, i:e. pri<;e of futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, subscription service publications such as CrowesTM or Random LengthsTM, or internally generated metrics derived from the server database. Once all the prices are retrieved for each type, at a step 930 the routine 900 then iteratively calculates the market price for the quantity of each type of lumber in quote. Once the totals for all types are calculated, routine 900 continues to a step 935 where the routine 900 calculates the total market price for the quote by summing all the most current prices calculated in step 930. Although this example illustrates that steps 910-920 are executed before steps 925-935, these two groups of steps can be executed in any order, or in parallel, so long as they are both executed before a comparison step 940.
At step 940, routine 900 compares the total quoted to the metric price to arrive at a comparative value. In one exemplary embodiment of the current invention the comparative value is a "percent of metric" value. A value higher than one (1) percent indicates a price that is above the metric rate, and a lower percent indicates a price that is below the metric rate.
The operation of the routine 900 can be further illustrated through an example utilizing specific exemplary data. In the example, a buyer sends out a request for quote (RFQ) requesting a lot of lumber consisting of fiver units of 2"x4"x8', two units of 2"x4"x 14' and five units of 2"x4"x 16'. The buyer then receives quotes from tree sellers. Seller A responds with a tally of six units of 2"x4"x8', four units of 2"x4"x 14' and three units of 2"x4"x 16' for $287 per thousand board feet.
Seller B
responds with a lot of five units of 2"x4"x8', one unit of 2"x4"xl4' and six units of 2"x4"x 16' for $283 per thousand board feet. Seller C responds with a lot of one unit of 2"x4"x8', five units of 2"x4"x 14' and five units of 2"x4"x 16' for $282 per thousand board feet. Suppose also that the market price :for 2"x4"x8's is $287.50, for 2"x4"x 14's it is $278.50 and for 2"x4"x 16' it is $288.
Viewing the MBF prices for the respective quotes is not particularly informative, given that certain lengths of lumber are more desirable and priced accordingly in the marketplace. By processing the quote from Seller A using routine 900, we arrive at a total MBF of 152, giving a total quoted price of $43,624.
The selected metric price for the same types and quantity of lumber would be $43,220;
therefore the quoted price would have a percent of market value of 100.93%.
Processing the quote from Seller B using routine 900, we arrive at a total MBF
of 150 giving a total quoted price of $42,450. The selected metric price for the same types and quantity of lumber however would be $43,047, therefore the quoted price would have a percent of market value of 98.61 %. Final:Ly, processing the quote from Seller C using routine 900, we arrive at a total MBF of 158 giving a total quoted price of $44,556. The selected metric price for the same types and quantity of lumber however would be $44,835 therefore the quoted price would have a percent of market value of 99.38%. By looking at the percent of selected metric value it is apparent that the price from Seller B is a better value. As shown in the methods of FIGURES 5-7, this price normalization process allows users to compare inherently different offers having different quality and quantities values.
In yet another example of an application of the normalization process, additional exemplary data is used to demonstrate the analysis of a transaction having one RFQ from a buyer and two different quotes from a seller, normalized to comparable product of another specie In this example, the buyer produces an RFQ
listing the following items: one carload of Eastern SPF (ESPF) lumber having four units of 2"x4"x8', four units of 2"x4"x10', six units of 2"x4"x12', two units of 2"x4"x14', and six units of 2"x4"x16'. The vendor then responds with two different quotes with two different unit tallies and two different prices. The first response lists a quote price of $320 per thousand board feet and a slight modification of the tally provides four units of 2"x4"x8', four units of 2"x4"x10', six units of 2"x4"x12', three units of 2"x4"x 14', and five units of 2 "x4"x 16'. The second response quotes per the requested tally at a price of $322 per thousand board feet. Both quotes list the delivery location as "Chicago."
To display the quotes, the server 230 produces a Web page similar to that displayed in FIGURE 8C, where the vendor's modified tally is displayed in highlighted text. The buyer can then view summary metric comparison or select the hypertext link "View Calculation Detail," which then invokes the server 230 to produce a Web page as shown in FIGURE 8D. Referring now to the Web page illustrated in FIGURE 8D, the data produced by the; server 230 compares the response to a selected metric of a different specie, Western SPF (WSPF), for items of same size, grade, and tally. The market price for same 2x4 tally of ESPF and WSPF
are thus simultaneously compared. In an example )=;astern quoted at $322 per thousand board feet, Western metric (Random Lengths 6/26/2000 print price plus freight of $80 as defined in Metric Manager) for same. tally being $331.791.
This metric comparison is also represented as Quote/Metric Value or Eastern price representing .970490 or 97% of comparable Western product.
In review of the normalization process, the buyer must select a metric source for price information for a defined item given a set of attributes, i.e., grade, species, and size. The metric may then be mapped to the RFQ item for comparison and does not have to be equivalent of item. For instance, as explained in the above-described example, it may be desirable to map the market relationship of one commodity item to another. The most current pricing data for the metric is electronically moved from the selected source to the server 230. As mentioned ab~nve_ metri~~ may r.nmP
frnm publicly available information, (i.e., price of Futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange), or subscription services, (i.e., CrowesTM or Random LengthsTM Publications), or be an internal metric generated by the server 230.
This metric data is used in the normalization process for all calculations, as described with reference to the above-described methods.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that within the scope of the appended claims, various changes can be made therein without departing from the; spirit of the invention. For example, in an agricultural commodity, an order for Wheat U.S. #2 HRW could be compared to a selected metric of Wheat U.S. #2 Soft White, similar to how different species are analyzed in the above-described example.
The above system and method can be used to purchase other commodity items such as in the trade of livestock. In such a variation, order information such as a lumber tally would be substituted for a meat type, grade, and cut. Other examples of commodity items include agricultural products, metals, or any other items of commerce having several order parameters.
NETWORK COMMODITIES PURCHASING
Field of the Invention This invention generally relates to electronic commerce software applications and, more particularly, to a method and system relating; to commodities purchasing over a network of distributed computing devices.
Background of the Invention Commodity items such as lumber, agricultural products, metals, and livestock/meat are usually traded in the open market between a number of buyers and sellers. The sales transactions of most commodity items involve a number of parameters. For instance, in the trade of commodity lumber, a buyer usually orders materials by specifying parameters such as lumber species, grade, size (i.e.
2x4, 2x10, etc.) and length, as well as the "tally" or mix of mzits of various lengths within shipment, method of transportation (i.e., rail or truck), shipping terms (i.e., FOB or delivered), and desired date of receipt, with each parameter influencing the value of the commodity purchase. Given the multiple possible combinations of factors, a commodity buyer often finds it difficult to objectively .compare similar but unequal offerings among competing vendors.
For example, in a case where a lumber buyer desires to order a railcar load of spruce (SPF) Zx4's of #2 & Better grade, the buyer would query vendors offering matching specie and grade carloads seeking the best match for the buyer's need or tally preference at the lowest market price. Lumber carloads are quoted at a price per thousand board feet for all material on the railcar. In a market where the shipping parameters are not identical, it is very difficult for buyers to determine the comparative value of unequal offerings.
Typically a lumber buyer will find multiple vendors each having different offerings available. For example, a railcar of SPF 2x4's may be quoted at rate of $300 / MBF (thousand board feet) by multiple vendors. Even though MBF price is equal, one vendor's carload may represent significantly greater marketplace value because it contains the more desirable lengths of 2x4's, such as builder preferred sixteen foot 2x4's. When the offering price varies in addition to the mix of lengths, it becomes increasingly difficult to compare quotes from various vendors.
Further, because construction projects often require long lead times, the lumber product may need to be priced now, but not delivered until a time in the future.
Alternately, another specie of lumber (i.e. southern pine) may represent an acceptable substitute.
Therefore, from the foregoing, there is a need for a method and system that allows buyers to evaluate the price of commodity offerings possessing varying shipping parameters.
Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a system and method for managing and evaluating commodities purchasing over a network of distributed computing devices.
In one embodiment, the method allows a plurality of buyers to generate one request for quote and, in response to the request for quote, receive a quote from plurality of vendors. The system of the present invention provides a price normalization routine that allows buyers to evaluate and compare a normalized price for commodity products having different evaluation parameters. In an arrangement comprising a plurality of computers connected to a network, said plurality of computers including:
at least one server; at least one buyer client computer; and a plurality of seller client computers, the method for providing commodities exchange services first provides a web-based browsable display describing at least one commodities exchange service.
The system then receives at least one request for quote (RFQ) from the buyer.
Responsive to the RFQ, the system then receives at least one quote from different sellers, where each quote may have a different price and quantity listed. The system then normalizes the prices received from the different quotes by applying a metric factor to the quote to produce an adjusted price. The adjusted price then allows the buyer to readily compare the prices of a number of commodity items having inherently different values to an objective measure. In addition, the system tracks all transactional activity and provides a cross compilation tool for evaluation and analysis.
Brief Description of the Drawings The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 is a block diagram of a prior art representative portion of the Internet.
FIGURE 2 is a pictorial diagram of a system of devices connected to the Internet, which depict the travel route of data in accordance with the present invention.
FIGURE 3 is a block diagram of the several components of the buyer's computer shown in FIGURE 2 that is used to request information on a particular route ~n accordance with the present invention.
FIGURE 4 is a block diagram of the several components of an information server shown in FIGURE 2 that is used to supply information on a particular route in accordance with the present invention.
FIGURE 5 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic of a routine used by the information server to receive and process the buyer's actions.
FIGURES 6A-6B are flow diagrams illustrating another embodiment of the logic used by the information server to receive and process the quotes and quote requests of both buyers and vendors.
FIGURE 7 is a flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of the logic used by the information server to execute the process of .a catalog purchase.
FIGURES 8A-8D are images of windows produced by a Web browser application installed on a client computer accessing a server illustrating one embodiment of the present invention.
FIGURE 9 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the normalization process in accordance with the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment The term "Internet" refers to the collection of networks and routers that use the Internet Protocol (IP) to communicate with one another. A representative section of the Internet 100 as known in the prior art is shown in FIGURE 1 in which a plurality of local area networks (LANs) 120 and a wide <~rea network (WAN) 110 are interconnected by routers 125. The routers 125 are; generally special purpose computers used to interface one LAN or WAN to another. Communication links within the LANs may be twisted wire pair, or coaxial cable, while communication links between networks may utilize 56 Kbps analog telephone lines, or 1 Mbps digital T-1 lines and/or 45 Mbps T-3 lines. Further computers and other related electronic devices can be remotely connected to either the LANs 120 or the WAN 110 via a modem and temporary telephone link. Such computers and electronic devices 130 are shown in FIGURE 1 as connected to one of the LANs via dotted lines. It will be appreciated that the Internet comprises a vast number of such interconnected networks, computers, and routers and that only a small, representative section of the Internet 100 is shown in FIGURE 1.
The World Wide Web (WWW), on the other hand, is vast collection of interconnected, electronically stored information located on servers connected throughout the Internet 100. Many companies are now providing services and access to their content over the Internet 100 using the WW'JV. In accordance with the present invention and as shown in FIGURE 2, there may be a plurality of buyers operating a plurality of client computing devices 235. FIGURE 2 generally shows a system 200 of computers and devices to which an information server 230 is connected and to which the buyers' computers 235 are also connected. Also connected to the Internet 100, is a plurality of computing devices 250 associated with a plurality of sellers. The system 200 also includes a communications program, referred to as CEA, which is used on seller's computing devices 250 to create a communication means between the seller's backend office software and the server application.
The buyers of a market commodity may, through their computers 235, request information about a plurality of items or order over the Internet 100 via a Web browser installed on the buyers' computers. Responsive to such requests, the information server 230, also referred to as a server 230, rnay combine the first buyer's information with information from other buyers on other computing devices 235.
The server 230 then transmits the combined buyer data to the respective computing devices 250 associated with the plurality of buyers. Details of this process are described in more detail below in association with FIGURES 5-7.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate l:hat in other embodiments of the present invention, the capabilities of the server 230 and/or the client computing devices 235 and 250 may all be embodied in the other configurations.
Consequently, it would be appreciated that in these embodiments, the server 230 could be located on any computing device associated with the buyer or seller's computing devices.
Additionally, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that while only four buyer computing devices 235, four seller computing devices 250, and one server are depicted in FIGURE 2, numerous configurations involving a vast number of buyer and seller computing devices and a plurality of servers 230, equipped with the hardware and software components described below, may be connected to the Internet 100.
FIGURE 3 depicts several of the key components of the buyer's client computing device 235. As known in the art, client computing devices 235 are also referred to as "clients" or "devices," and client computing devices 23 5 also include other devices such as palm computing devices, cellular telephones, or other like forms of electronics. A client computing device can also be the same computing device as the server 230. An "agent" can be a person, server, or a client computing device 235 having software configured to assist the buyer in making purchasing decisions based on one or more buyer determined parameters. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the buyers' computer 235 in actual practice will include many more components than those shown in FIGURE 3. However, it is not necessary that all of these generally conventional components be shown in order to disclose an illustrative embodiment for practicing the present invention. As shown in FIGURE 3, the buyer's computer includes a network interface 315 for connecting to the Internet 100. Those of ordinary skill in the art will. appreciate that the network interface 315 includes the necessary circuitry for such a connection, and is also constructed for use with the TCP/IP protocol.
The buyers' computer 235 also includes a processing unit 305, a display 310, and a memory 300 all interconnected along with the network interface 315 via a bus 360. The memory 300 generally comprises a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM) and a permanent mass storage device, such as a disk drive.
The memory 300 stores the program code necessary for oequesting and/or depicting a desired route over the Internet 100 in accordance with l:he present invention.
More specifically, the memory 300 stores a Web browser 330, such as Netscape's NAVIGATOR or Microsoft's INTERNET EXPLORER browsers, used in accordance with the present invention for depicting a desired route over the Internet 100. In addition, memory 300 also stores an operating system 320 and a communications application 325. It will be appreciated that these software components may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory 300 of the buyers' computer 235 using a drive mechanism associated with the computer-readable medium, such as a floppy, tape or CD-ROM drive.
As will be described in more detail below, the user interface which allows products to be ordered by the buyers are supplied b~y a remote server, i.e., the information server 230 located elsewhere on the Internet as illustrated in FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 4 depicts several of the key components of the information server 230.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate thal; the information server 230 includes many more components than shown in FIG~JRE 4. However, it is not necessary that all of these generally conventional components be shown in order to disclose an illustrative embodiment for practicing the present invention. As shown in FIGURE 4, the information server 230 is connected to the Internet 100 via a network interface 410. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the network interface 410 includes the necessary circuitry for connecting the information server 230 to the Internet 100, and is constructed for use with the TCP/IP
protocol.
The information server 230 also includes a processing unit 415, a display 440, and a mass memory 450 all interconnected along with the network interface 410 via a bus 460. The mass memory 450 generally comprises a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), and a permanent mass storage device, such as a hard disk drive, tape drive, optical drive, floppy disk drive, or combination thereof.
The mass memory 450 stores the program code and data necessary for incident and route analysis as well as supplying the results of that analysis to consumers in accordance with the present invention. More specifically, the mass memory 450 stores a metrics application 425 formed in accordance with the present invention for managing the purchase forums of commodities products. In addition, mass memory 450 stores a database 445 of buyer information: continuously logged by the information server 230 for statistical market analysis. It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the database 445 of product and buyer information may also be stored on other servers or storage devices connected to the either the information server 230 or the Internet 100. Finally, mass memory 450 stores Web server software 430 for handling requests for stored information received via the Internet 100 and the WWW, and an operating system 420. It will be appreciated that the aforementioned software components may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into mass memory 450 of the information server 230 using a drive mechanism associated with the computer-readable medium, such as floppy, tape or CD-ROM drive. In addition, the data stored in the mass memory 450 and other memory can be "exposed" to other computers or persons for purposes of communicating data. Thus, "exposing" data from a computing device could mean transmitting data to another device or person, transferring XML data packets, transferring data within the same computer, or other like forms of data communications.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, FIGURE 5 is a flow chart illustrating the logic implemented for the creation of a Request for Quote (RFQ) by a singular buyer or a pool of buyers. In process of FIGURE 5, also referred to as the pooling process 500, a buyer or a pool of buyers generate an RFQ
which is displayed or transmitted to a plurality of sellers. Responsive to receiving the RFQ, the sellers then send quotes to the buyers.
In summary, the creation of the RFQ consists of at least one buyer initially entering general user identification information to initiate the process. The buyer would then define a Line Item on a Web page displaying an RFQ form. The Line Item is defined per industry specification and units of product are grouped as a "tally"
per industry practice. The pooling process 500 allows buyers to combine RFQ
Line Items with other buyers with like needs. In one embodiment, the pool buy feature is created by a graphical user interface where the RFQ Line Items from a plurality of buyers is displayed on a Web page to one of the pool buyers, referred to as the pool administrator. The server 230 also provides a Web-based feature allowing the pool administrator to selectively add each RFQ Line Item to one combined RFQ. The combined RFQ is then sent to at least one vendor or seller. This feature provides a forum for pooling the orders of many buyers, which allows individual entities or divisions of larger companies to advantageously bid for larger orders, thus providing them with more bidding power and the possibility of gaining a lower price.
The pooling process 500 begins in a step 501 where a buyer initiates the process by providing buyer purchase data. In step 501, the buyer accesses a Web page transmitted from the server 230 configured to receive the buyer purchase data, also referred to as the product specification data set o~r the Line Item data.
One exemplary Web page for the logic of step 501 is depicted in FIGURE 8A. As shown in FIGURE 8A, the buyer enters the Line Item data specifications in the fields of the Web page. The Line Item data consists of lumber species and grade 803, number of pieces per unit 804, quantities of the various unit<.~ comprising the preferred assortment in the tally 805A-E, delivery method 806, delivery date 807, delivery _g_ location 808, and the overall quantity 809. In one embodiment, the buyer must define the delivery date as either contemporaneous "on-or-before" delivery date, or specify a delivery date in the future for a "Forward Price" RFQ. In addition, the buyer selects a metric or multiple metrics in a field 810 per RFQ Line Item (tally).
As described in more detail below, the metric provides pricing data that is used as a reference point for the buyer to compare the various quotes returned from the sellers.
The buyer RFQ Line Item data is then stored in the memory of the server 230.
Returning to FIGURE 5, at a next step 503, the server 230 determines if the buyer is going to participate in a pool buy. In the process of decision block 503, the server 230 provides an option in a Web page that allows the buyer to post their Line Item data to a vendor or post their Line Item data to a buyer pool. The window illustrated in FIGURE 8A is one exemplary Web page illustrating these options for a buyer. As shown in FIGURE 8A, the links "Post Buyer Pool" 812 and "Post to Vendors" 814 are provided on the RFQ Web page.
At a step 503, if the buyer does not elect to participate in a pool buy, the process continues to a step 513 where the server 230 generates a request for a quote (RFQ) from the buyer's Line Item data. A detailed description of how the server 230 generates a request for a quote (RFQ) is summarized below and referred to as the purchase order process 600A depicted in FIGURE 6A.
Alternatively at the decision block 503, if the buyer elects to participate in a pool buy, the process continues to a step 505 where the system notifies other buyers logged into the server 230 that an RFQ is available in a. pool, allowing other buyers to add additional Line Items (tallies) to the RFQ. In this part of the process, the Line Items from each buyer are received by and stored in the server memory. The Line Items provided by each buyer in the pool are received by the server 230 using the same process as described above with reference to block 501 and the Web page of FIGURE 8A. All of the Line Items stored on the server 230 are then displayed to a pool administrator via a Web page or an email message. In one embodiment, the pool administrator is one of the buyers in a pool, where the pool administrator has the capability to select all of the Line Item data to generate a combined RFQ. The server 230 provides the pool administrator with this capability by the use of any Web-based communicative device, such as email or HTML forms. As part of the process, as shown in steps 507 and 509, the pool may be left open fmr a predetermined period of time to allow additional buyers to add purchase data to the current RFQ.
At a decision block 509, the server 230 determines if the pool administrator has closed the pool. The logic of this step 509 is executed when the server receives the combined RFQ data from the pool administrator. The pool administrator can send the combined RFQ data to the server 230 via an HTML farm or by other electronic messaging means such as email or URL strings. Once the server 230 has determined that the pool is closed, the process continues to block 510 where the Line Items from each buyer (the combined RFQ) is sent to all of the buyers in the pool.
The process then continues to the step 513 where the server 230 sends the combined RFQ to the vendors or sellers.
Referring now to FIGURE 6A, one embodiment of the purchase-negotiation process 600 is disclosed. The purchase-negotiation process 600 is also referred to as an solicited offer process or the market purchase proces<.~. In summary, the purchase-negotiation process 600 allows at least one buyer to submit an RFQ and then view quotes from a plurality of vendors and purchase items from selected vendor(s).
The logic of FIGURE 6A provides buyers with a forum that automatically manages, collects and normalizes the price of desired commodity items. The purchase-negotiation process 600 calculates a normalized price data set that is based on a predefined metric(s). The calculation of the normalized price data set in combination with the format of the Web pages described herein create an integrated forum where quotes for a plurality of inherently dissimilar products can be easily obtained and compared.
The purchase-negotiation process 600 begins at a~ step 601 where the RFQ, as generated by one buyer or a pool of buyers in the process depicted in FIGURE
5, is sent to a plurality of computing devices 250 associated with a plurality of sellers or vendors. The vendors receive the RFQ via a web page transmitted by the server 230.
In one embodiment, the vendors receive an email message having a hypertext link to the RFQ Web page to provide notice the vendor. Responsive to the information in the buyers' RFQ, the process then continues to a step 603 where at least one vendor sends their quote information to the server 230.
In the process of step 603, the vendors respond to the RFQ by sending their price quote to the server 230 for display via a Web pagf; to the buyer or buyer pool.
Generally described, the vendors send an HTML form or an email message with a price and description of the order. The description of the order in the quote message contains the same order information as the RFQ.
FIGURE 8B illustrates one exemplary Web page of a vendor quote that is displayed to the buyer. As shown in FIGURE 8B, th.e vendor quote includes the vendor's price 813, the lumber species and grade 803, number of pieces per unit 804, quantities of the various units comprising the preferred assortment in the tally 805A-E, delivery method 806, delivery date 807, and delivery location 808. In the quote response message, the vendor has the capability to modify any of the information that was submitted in the RFQ. For example, the vendor may edit the quantity values for the various units comprising the preferred assortment in the tally 805A-E. This allows the vendor to adjust the buyer's request according to the vendor's inventory, best means of transportation, etc. All of the vendor's quote information is referred to as price data set or the RFQ Line Item (tally) quote.
Returning to FIGURE 6A, the process continues to a step 605, where the server 230 normalizes the price of each RFQ Line Item (tally) quote from each vendor. The normalization of the vendor's price is a computation that adjusts the vendor's price utilizing data from a metric. The normalization process is carried out because each vendor may respond to the Line Items of an RFQ by quoting products that are different from buyer's RFQ and/or have a different tally configuration. The normalization of the pricing allows the buyers to objectively compare the relative value of the different products offered by the plurality of vendors. For example, one vendor may produce a quote for an RFQ of: one unit of 2x4x12, two units of 2x4x12, and three units of 2x4x 16. At the same time, another vendor may submit a quote for three units of 2x4x 12, one unit of 2x4x 12, and two units of 2x4x 16. Even though there is some difference between these two offerings, thE; price normalization process provides a means for the buyer to effectively compare and evaluate the different quotes even though there are variations in the products. The price normalization process 900 is described in more detail below in conjunction with the flow diagram of FIGURE 9.
Returning again to FIGURE 6A, at a step 607 the vendor's quote information is communicated to the buyer's computer for display. As shown in FIGURE 8B and described in detail above, the vendor's quote is displayed via a Web page that communicates the vendor's quote price 813 and other purchase information. In addition, the vendor's quote page contains a metric price 815 and a quote price vs.
metric price ratio 816. The metric price 815 and the quote price vs. metric price ratio 816 are also referred to as a normalized price data value.
Next, at a step 609, the buyer or the administrator of the buyer pool, compares the various products and prices quoted by the vendors along with the normalized price for each Line Item on the RFQ. In this part of the process, the buyer may decide to purchase one of the products from a particular vendor and sends a notification to the selected vendor indicating the sanne. The buyer notifies the selected vendor by the use of an electronic means via the server 230, such as an HTML form, a chat window, email, etc. For example, the quote Web page depicted in FIGURE 8B shows two different quotes with two different tallies, the first quote price 813 of $360, and the second quote price 813A of $320. If the buyer determines that they prefer to purchase the materials listed in the first quote, the buyer selects the "Buy!" hyperlink 820 or 820A associated with the desired tally.
If the buyer is not satisfied with any of thc~ listed vendor quotes, the server 230 allows the buyer to further negotiate with one or more of the vendors to obtain a new quote. This step is shown in decision block 61 l, where the buyer makes the determination to either accept a quoted price or proceed to a step where they negotiate with the vendor to obtain another quote or present a counter offer. Here, the server 230 provides a graphical user interface configured to allow the buyer and one vendor to electronically communicate, such as a chat window, streaming voice communications or other standard methods of communication.
There are many forms of electronic communications known in the art that can be used to allow the buyer and vendors to communicate.
The buyer and seller negotiate various quotes andl iterate through several steps 603-613 directed by the server 230, where each quote is normalized, compared and further negotiated until quote is accepted by the buyer or negotiations cease.
While the buyer and seller negotiate the various quotes, the server 230 stores each quote until the two parties agree on a price. At any step during; the negotiation process, the system always presents the buyer with an option to terminate the negotiation if dissatisfied with the quote(s).
At decision block 611, when a buyer agrees on a quoted price, the process then continues to a step 615 where the buyer sends a notification message to the vendor indicating they have accepted a quote. As described above with reference to steps 603-613, the buyer notification message of step 615 may be in the form of a message on a chat window, email, by an HTML form., or the like. However, the buyer notification must be transmitted in a format that allows the system to record the transaction. The buyer notification may include all .of the information regarding the specifications by RFQ Line Item, such as, but not limited to, the buy price, date and method of shipment, and payment terms.
The purchase-negotiation process ,600 is then finalized when the system, as shown in a step 617, sends a confirmation message to a tracking system. The confirmation message includes all of the information related to the agreed sales transaction.
Optionally, the process includes a step 619, where the server 230 stores all of the information related to RFQ, offers, and the final sales transaction in a historical database. This would allow the server 230 to use all of the transaction information in an analysis process for providing an improved method of obtaining a lower market price in future transactions and in identifying optimum purchasing strategy.
The analysis process is described in further detail below. Although the illustrated embodiment is configured to store the data related to the sales transactions, the system can also be configured to store all of the iterative quote information exchanged between the buyer and vendor.
Referring now to FIGURE 6B, an embodiment of the unsolicited offer process 650 is disclosed. In summary, the unsolicited offer process 650, also referred to as the unsolicited market purchase process, allows at least one buyer to view unsolicited offers from a plurality of vendors and purchase items from a plurality of vendors from the offers. The logic of FIGURE 6B provides buyers with a forum that automatically manages, collects and normalizes price quotes based on metric data.
By the price normalization method of FIGURE 6B, the server 230 creates an integrated forum where offers from a plurality of inherf;ntly dissimilar products can be obtained and normalized for determination of purchase.
The unsolicited offer process 650 begins at a step 651 where the plurality of vendors are able to submit offers to the server 230. This part of the process is executed in manner similar to step 603 of FIGURE 6A, where the vendor submits a quote to the server 230. However, in the Web page of step 651, the server 230 generates a Web page containing several tallies from :many different vendors.
In addition, at step 651, the server 230 stores all of the unsolicited offer data provided by the vendors.
Next, at a step 653, a buyer views the offers stored on the server 230. This part of the process is carried out in a manner similar to the process of step 603 or 607 where the server 230 displays a plurality of offers similar to the tallies depicted in FIGURE 8A.
Next, at a step 655, the buyer selects a metric for the calculation of the normalized price associated with the selected offer. As described in more detail below, metrics may come from publicly available info~:mation, i.e., price of futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, subscription services such as CrowesTM or Random LengthsTM, or internally generated metrics derived from the data stored in the server 230. The normalization calcula~ti~n_ c,therwl~P
YPfP,-rP~ tn ae the normalization process, occurs each time the buyer views a different offer, and the normalization calculation uses the most current metric data for each calculation. The normalization process is carried out because each vendor will most likely offer products that may vary from products of other vendors, and have a different tally configuration from those supplied by other vendors. The: normalization of the pricing allows the buyers to compare the relative value of the different products offered by the number of vendors. The metric price for each selected offer is displayed in a similar manner as the metric price 815 and 816 shown in the Web page of FIGURE 8B.
Next, at decision block 657, the buyer selects at least one offer for purchase.
This is similar to the process of FIGURE 6A in that t;he buyer selects the "Buy!"
hyperlink 820 associated with the desired tally to purchase an order. The process then continues to steps 659-663, where at step 659 the process transmits a buy notice to the vendor, then at step 661 sends a purchase confirmation to the tracking system, and then at step 663 saves the transaction data in the server database. The steps 659-663 are carried out in the same manner as the steps 615-619 of FIGURE 6A.
In the above-described process, the buyer notification. may include all of the information regarding the specifications by RFQ Line Item, and data such as, but not limited to, the buy price, date and method of shipment, and the payment terms.
Referring now to FIGURE 7, a flow diagram illustrating yet another embodiment of the present invention is shown. FIGURE 7 illustrates the catalog purchase process 700. This embodiment allows buyers to search for a catalog price of desired commerce items, enter their purchase data based on the pre-negotiated catalog prices, and to compare those catalog prices with a selected metric price and the current market price, wherein the current market price is determined by the purchase-negotiation process 600.
The process starts at a step 701 where the buyer selects a program catalog.
The program catalog provides buyers with the published or pre-negotiated price of the desired products. Next, at a step 703, based on the catalog information, the buyer then enters their purchase data. Similar to the step SO:I of FIGURE 5 and the tally shown in FIGURE 8A, the buyer sends purchase data to the server 230, such as the desired quantity of each item and the lumber species, grade, etc.
The process then proceeds to decision block 707 where the buyer makes a determination of whether to purchase the items using the catalog price, or purchase the desired product in the open market. Here, the server 230 allows the user to make this determination by displaying the metric price of each catalog price. This format is similar to the metric price 815 and 816 displayed in FIGURE 8B.
At decision block 707, if the buyer determines that the catalog price is better than a selected metric price, the process then proceeds to steps 709, 711, and 713, where a program buy from the catalog is executed, and the buyer's purchase information is stored on the server 230 and sent to the vendor's system to confirm the sale. These steps 711-713 axe carried out in the same mlnner as the confirmation and save steps 617 and 619 as shown in FIGURE 6A.
At decision block 707, if the buyer determines that the metric price is better than the catalog price, the process continues to a step 717 where the buyers purchase data is entered into an RFQ. At this step, the process carries out the first five steps 601-609 of the method of FIGURE 6A to provide buyers with the price data from the open market, as well as provide the normalized. prices for each open market quote. At a step 719, the server 230 then displays a web page that allows the user to select from a purchase option of a catalog or spot (market) purchase. At decision block 721, based on the displayed information, the buyer will then have an opportunity to make a determination of whether they will proceed with a catalog purchase or an open market purchase.
At decision block 721, if the buyer proceeds with the catalog purchase, the process continues to step 709 where the catalog purchase is executed. The steps 709-713 used to carry out the catalog purchase are the same as if the buyer had selected the catalog purchase in step 707. However, if at decision block 721 the buyer selects the option to proceed with the market purchase, the process continues to a step 723 where the RFQ generated in step 717 is sent to the vendor. Here, the process carries out the steps of FIGURE 6 to complete the open market purchase. More specifically, the process continues to step 609 where the buyer corr~pares the normalized prices from each vendor. Once a vendor is selected, the negotiation process of steps 613 is carried out until the buyer decides to execute the purchase. Next, the transaction steps 615-619 are carried out to confirm the purchase, notify the tracking system, and save the transactional data on the historical database.
Optionally, the process can include a step where the server 230 stores all of the information related to program buy and metric comparisons, and the final sales transaction in a historical database. This would allow the server 230 to use all of the transaction information in an analysis process for providing an improved method of obtaining the value of the program. Although the illustrated embodiment is configured to store the data related to the sales transactions, the system can also be configured to store all of the iterative quote information exchanged between the buyer and vendor.
The analysis process allows the server 230 to utiilize the sales history records stored in steps 619 and 711 to generate price reports for various third parties as well as provide a means of calculating current market prices for products sold in the above-described methods. The sales history records are also used as the source for a metric such as those used in the process of FIGURES EiA, 6B, and 7. As shown in steps 619, 663, and 71 l, the server 230 continually updates the historical database for each sales transaction. The analysis reporting process allows a buyer or manager of buyers to conduct analysis on the historical information. This analysis would include multi-value cross compilation, for purposes of deterrriining purchasing strategies, buyer effectiveness, program performance, vendor performance, and measuring effectiveness of forward pricing as a risk management sty.°ategy.
Referring now to FIGURE 9, a flow diagram illustrating the logic of the normalization process 900 is shown. The logic of the normalization process 900 resides on the server 230 and processes the quotes received from commodity sellers.
The logic begins in at a step 905 where quote data is obtained from the seller in response to the buyer's RFQ as described above.
Next, at a step 910, routine 900 iteratively calculates the board footage (BF) of each type of lumber. Once all the totals are calculated for each type, routine 900 continues to a step 915 where the server 230 calculates the total type price.
At step 915, routine 900 iteratively calculates the total type price for the amount of each type of lumber specified in the quote. The is accomplished by taking the total board footage (BF), calculated in block 910 anal multiplying the total BF by the price per MBF specified in the quote. Once all the prices are calculated for each type, routine 900 continues to a step 920 where the server 230 calculates total quoted price. At step 920 the routine 900 calculates the total price for the quote by summing all the total type prices calculated at step 915.
At a step 925, routine 900 iteratively retrieves th.e most current price for each type of lumber specified in the quote from a predefined metric source(s).
Metrics may come from publicly available information, i:e. pri<;e of futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, subscription service publications such as CrowesTM or Random LengthsTM, or internally generated metrics derived from the server database. Once all the prices are retrieved for each type, at a step 930 the routine 900 then iteratively calculates the market price for the quantity of each type of lumber in quote. Once the totals for all types are calculated, routine 900 continues to a step 935 where the routine 900 calculates the total market price for the quote by summing all the most current prices calculated in step 930. Although this example illustrates that steps 910-920 are executed before steps 925-935, these two groups of steps can be executed in any order, or in parallel, so long as they are both executed before a comparison step 940.
At step 940, routine 900 compares the total quoted to the metric price to arrive at a comparative value. In one exemplary embodiment of the current invention the comparative value is a "percent of metric" value. A value higher than one (1) percent indicates a price that is above the metric rate, and a lower percent indicates a price that is below the metric rate.
The operation of the routine 900 can be further illustrated through an example utilizing specific exemplary data. In the example, a buyer sends out a request for quote (RFQ) requesting a lot of lumber consisting of fiver units of 2"x4"x8', two units of 2"x4"x 14' and five units of 2"x4"x 16'. The buyer then receives quotes from tree sellers. Seller A responds with a tally of six units of 2"x4"x8', four units of 2"x4"x 14' and three units of 2"x4"x 16' for $287 per thousand board feet.
Seller B
responds with a lot of five units of 2"x4"x8', one unit of 2"x4"xl4' and six units of 2"x4"x 16' for $283 per thousand board feet. Seller C responds with a lot of one unit of 2"x4"x8', five units of 2"x4"x 14' and five units of 2"x4"x 16' for $282 per thousand board feet. Suppose also that the market price :for 2"x4"x8's is $287.50, for 2"x4"x 14's it is $278.50 and for 2"x4"x 16' it is $288.
Viewing the MBF prices for the respective quotes is not particularly informative, given that certain lengths of lumber are more desirable and priced accordingly in the marketplace. By processing the quote from Seller A using routine 900, we arrive at a total MBF of 152, giving a total quoted price of $43,624.
The selected metric price for the same types and quantity of lumber would be $43,220;
therefore the quoted price would have a percent of market value of 100.93%.
Processing the quote from Seller B using routine 900, we arrive at a total MBF
of 150 giving a total quoted price of $42,450. The selected metric price for the same types and quantity of lumber however would be $43,047, therefore the quoted price would have a percent of market value of 98.61 %. Final:Ly, processing the quote from Seller C using routine 900, we arrive at a total MBF of 158 giving a total quoted price of $44,556. The selected metric price for the same types and quantity of lumber however would be $44,835 therefore the quoted price would have a percent of market value of 99.38%. By looking at the percent of selected metric value it is apparent that the price from Seller B is a better value. As shown in the methods of FIGURES 5-7, this price normalization process allows users to compare inherently different offers having different quality and quantities values.
In yet another example of an application of the normalization process, additional exemplary data is used to demonstrate the analysis of a transaction having one RFQ from a buyer and two different quotes from a seller, normalized to comparable product of another specie In this example, the buyer produces an RFQ
listing the following items: one carload of Eastern SPF (ESPF) lumber having four units of 2"x4"x8', four units of 2"x4"x10', six units of 2"x4"x12', two units of 2"x4"x14', and six units of 2"x4"x16'. The vendor then responds with two different quotes with two different unit tallies and two different prices. The first response lists a quote price of $320 per thousand board feet and a slight modification of the tally provides four units of 2"x4"x8', four units of 2"x4"x10', six units of 2"x4"x12', three units of 2"x4"x 14', and five units of 2 "x4"x 16'. The second response quotes per the requested tally at a price of $322 per thousand board feet. Both quotes list the delivery location as "Chicago."
To display the quotes, the server 230 produces a Web page similar to that displayed in FIGURE 8C, where the vendor's modified tally is displayed in highlighted text. The buyer can then view summary metric comparison or select the hypertext link "View Calculation Detail," which then invokes the server 230 to produce a Web page as shown in FIGURE 8D. Referring now to the Web page illustrated in FIGURE 8D, the data produced by the; server 230 compares the response to a selected metric of a different specie, Western SPF (WSPF), for items of same size, grade, and tally. The market price for same 2x4 tally of ESPF and WSPF
are thus simultaneously compared. In an example )=;astern quoted at $322 per thousand board feet, Western metric (Random Lengths 6/26/2000 print price plus freight of $80 as defined in Metric Manager) for same. tally being $331.791.
This metric comparison is also represented as Quote/Metric Value or Eastern price representing .970490 or 97% of comparable Western product.
In review of the normalization process, the buyer must select a metric source for price information for a defined item given a set of attributes, i.e., grade, species, and size. The metric may then be mapped to the RFQ item for comparison and does not have to be equivalent of item. For instance, as explained in the above-described example, it may be desirable to map the market relationship of one commodity item to another. The most current pricing data for the metric is electronically moved from the selected source to the server 230. As mentioned ab~nve_ metri~~ may r.nmP
frnm publicly available information, (i.e., price of Futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange), or subscription services, (i.e., CrowesTM or Random LengthsTM Publications), or be an internal metric generated by the server 230.
This metric data is used in the normalization process for all calculations, as described with reference to the above-described methods.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that within the scope of the appended claims, various changes can be made therein without departing from the; spirit of the invention. For example, in an agricultural commodity, an order for Wheat U.S. #2 HRW could be compared to a selected metric of Wheat U.S. #2 Soft White, similar to how different species are analyzed in the above-described example.
The above system and method can be used to purchase other commodity items such as in the trade of livestock. In such a variation, order information such as a lumber tally would be substituted for a meat type, grade, and cut. Other examples of commodity items include agricultural products, metals, or any other items of commerce having several order parameters.
Claims (36)
1. In an arrangement comprising a plurality of agents connected to a network, said plurality of agents including at least one server, at least one buyer agent and at least one seller agent, a method for calculating commodities exchange price data, comprising:
receiving at least one request for quote from said buyer agent, wherein said request for quote includes a product specification data set;
transmitting the product specification data set to at least one seller agent;
receiving a price data set from said seller agent, wherein information in said price data set is responsive to the product specification data set; and normalizing said price data set, thereby creating a normalized price data value.
receiving at least one request for quote from said buyer agent, wherein said request for quote includes a product specification data set;
transmitting the product specification data set to at least one seller agent;
receiving a price data set from said seller agent, wherein information in said price data set is responsive to the product specification data set; and normalizing said price data set, thereby creating a normalized price data value.
2. The method of Claim 1, further comprising, exposing the normalized price data set to said buyer agent.
3. The method of Claim 1, further comprising, providing a browsable display describing at least one commodities exchange service and features for allowing a buyer agent to provide a request for quote.
4. The method of Claim 1, wherein the product specification data set includes a delivery date set at a future time.
5. The method of Claim 1, further comprising:
receiving a buy notice from said buyer agent; and transmitting a purchase order to at least one said seller agent.
receiving a buy notice from said buyer agent; and transmitting a purchase order to at least one said seller agent.
6. The method of Claim 1, further comprising:
receiving a plurality of product specification data, sets from at least two buyer agents; and combining said plurality of product specification data sets, thereby creating one request for quote.
receiving a plurality of product specification data, sets from at least two buyer agents; and combining said plurality of product specification data sets, thereby creating one request for quote.
7. The method of Claim 1, wherein said product specification data set includes information related to a buyer, a grade, a quantity, a tally, a method of shipment, and a ship date.
8. The method of Claim 1, wherein the product specification data set comprises a plurality of quantity values for a number of like commodity items having different size parameters, a description of at least one commodity item, and a description of a delivery method.
9. The method of Claim 1, wherein said price data set includes information to identify a seller, a quote price, shipment, and payment terms.
10. The method of Claim 8, wherein said price data set further includes an adjusted price, an adjusted quantity.
11. The method of Claim 1, further comprising, receiving an additional price data set from the seller agent, wherein the additional price data is a result from a renegotiated price.
12. The method of Claim 1, further comprising, storing the normalized price data set in a database communicatively connected to the server.
13. The method of Claim 1, wherein the normalizing step comprises, applying a metric transform to said price data set to create a normalized price data value.
14. The method of Claim 1, wherein product specification data set comprises a plurality of quantity values for a number of similar commodity items having different size parameters, wherein the normalizing step comprises:
calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said metric price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
multiplying said price per unit by said calculated size total value, thereby creating an adjusted market price total; and comparing said adjusted market price total by said price total, thereby creating a normalized price data set.
calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said metric price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
multiplying said price per unit by said calculated size total value, thereby creating an adjusted market price total; and comparing said adjusted market price total by said price total, thereby creating a normalized price data set.
15. The method of Claim 13, wherein comparing said adjusted market price total by said price total, includes determining a ratio by dividing said price total by said adjusted market price total, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
16. The method of Claim 1, wherein product specification data set comprises a plurality of quantity values for a number of commodity items having different size parameters and type parameters, wherein the normalizing step comprises:
for each type of commodity item, calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
summing said price total from each type of commodity item, thereby creating a total type price;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said market price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
for each type of commodity item, multiplying said price per unit by said size total value, thereby creating an market price total for each type of commodity item;
calculating a summed market price total from the summation of said market price total of each type of commodity item; and comparing said summed market price total by said total type price, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
for each type of commodity item, calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
summing said price total from each type of commodity item, thereby creating a total type price;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said market price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
for each type of commodity item, multiplying said price per unit by said size total value, thereby creating an market price total for each type of commodity item;
calculating a summed market price total from the summation of said market price total of each type of commodity item; and comparing said summed market price total by said total type price, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
17. The method of Claim 15, wherein comparing said summed market price total by said total type price, includes determining a ratio by dividing said total type price by said summed market price total, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
18. In an arrangement comprising a plurality of computers connected to a network, said plurality of computers including at least one server, at least one buyer client computer, and a plurality of seller client computers, a method for providing commodities exchange services, comprising:
providing a browsable display describing at least one commodities exchange service and features for allowing a buyer associated with said buyer client computer to provide a request for quote;
receiving at least one request for quote from said buyer client computer, wherein said request for quote includes a product specification data set;
transmitting said product specification data set to at least one of said plurality of seller client computers;
receiving a plurality of price data sets from said plurality of seller client computers, wherein said plurality of price data sets are responsive to said product specification data set;
normalizing said plurality of price data sets, thereby creating a normalized price data value; and transmitting said normalized price data set for depiction on said buyer client computer.
providing a browsable display describing at least one commodities exchange service and features for allowing a buyer associated with said buyer client computer to provide a request for quote;
receiving at least one request for quote from said buyer client computer, wherein said request for quote includes a product specification data set;
transmitting said product specification data set to at least one of said plurality of seller client computers;
receiving a plurality of price data sets from said plurality of seller client computers, wherein said plurality of price data sets are responsive to said product specification data set;
normalizing said plurality of price data sets, thereby creating a normalized price data value; and transmitting said normalized price data set for depiction on said buyer client computer.
19. The method of Claim 17, further comprising:
receiving a buy notice from said buyer client computer; and transmitting a purchase order to one of said seller computers of said plurality of seller client computers.
receiving a buy notice from said buyer client computer; and transmitting a purchase order to one of said seller computers of said plurality of seller client computers.
20. The method of Claim 17, further comprising:
receiving a plurality of product specification data sets from said plurality of buyer client computers; and combining said plurality of product specification data sets, thereby creating one request for quote.
receiving a plurality of product specification data sets from said plurality of buyer client computers; and combining said plurality of product specification data sets, thereby creating one request for quote.
21. The method of Claim 17, wherein said product specification data set includes information related to a buyer, said request for quote grade, quantity, tally, a method of shipment, and a ship date.
22. The method of Claim 17, wherein the product specification data set comprises a plurality of quantity values for a number of like commodity items having different size parameters, a description of at least one commodity item, and a description of a delivery method.
23. The method of Claim 17, wherein said price data set includes information to identify a seller, a quote price, shipment, and payment terms.
24. The method of Claim 22, wherein said price data set further includes an adjusted price, and an adjusted quantity.
25. The method of Claim 17, further comprising, receiving an additional price data set from the seller client computer, wherein the additional price data is a result from a renegotiated price.
26. The method of Claim 17, further comprising, storing the normalized price data set in a database communicatively connected to the server.
27. The method of Claim 17, wherein the normalizing step comprises, applying a metric transform to said price data set to create a normalized price data value.
28. The method of Claim 17, wherein product specification data set comprises a plurality of quantity values for a number of similar commodity items having different size parameters, wherein the normalizing step comprises:
calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said metric price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
multiplying said price per unit by said calculated size total value, thereby creating an adjusted market price total; and comparing said adjusted market price total by said price total, thereby creating a normalized price data set.
calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said metric price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
multiplying said price per unit by said calculated size total value, thereby creating an adjusted market price total; and comparing said adjusted market price total by said price total, thereby creating a normalized price data set.
29. The method of Claim 28, wherein comparing said adjusted market price total by said price total, includes determining a ratio by dividing said price total by said adjusted market price total, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
30. The method of Claim 17, wherein product specification data set comprises a plurality of quantity values for a number of commodity items having different size parameters and type parameters, wherein the normalizing step comprises:
for each type of commodity item, calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
summing said price total from each type of commodity item, thereby creating a total type price;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said market price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
for each type of commodity item, multiplying said price per unit by said size total value, thereby creating an market price total for each type of commodity item;
calculating a summed market price total from the summation of said market price total of each type of commodity item; and comparing said summed market price total by said total type price, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
for each type of commodity item, calculating a size total value based a summation of said commodity size parameters;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a price total from one of said price data sets;
summing said price total from each type of commodity item, thereby creating a total type price;
for each type of commodity item, retrieving a metric price data set, wherein said market price data set comprises a comparable price per unit of one of said commodity items;
for each type of commodity item, multiplying said price per unit by said size total value, thereby creating an market price total for each type of commodity item;
calculating a summed market price total from the summation of said market price total of each type of commodity item; and comparing said summed market price total by said total type price, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
31. The method of Claim 30, wherein comparing said summed market price total by said total type price, includes determining a ratio by dividing said total type price by said summed market price total, thereby creating the normalized price data value.
32. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for providing commodities exchange services, which, when executed, comprise:
providing a display describing at least one commodities exchange service on a computing device and features for allowing at least one buyer client computer to provide a request for quote;
receiving at least one request for quote from said buyer client computer, wherein the request for quote includes a product specification data set;
transmitting the product specification data set to a plurality of seller client computers;
receiving a plurality of price data sets from said plurality of seller client computers, wherein said plurality of price data sets are responsive to the product specification data set;
normalizing said plurality of price data sets, thereby creating the normalized price data value; and transmitting the normalized price data set for depiction on said buyer client computer.
providing a display describing at least one commodities exchange service on a computing device and features for allowing at least one buyer client computer to provide a request for quote;
receiving at least one request for quote from said buyer client computer, wherein the request for quote includes a product specification data set;
transmitting the product specification data set to a plurality of seller client computers;
receiving a plurality of price data sets from said plurality of seller client computers, wherein said plurality of price data sets are responsive to the product specification data set;
normalizing said plurality of price data sets, thereby creating the normalized price data value; and transmitting the normalized price data set for depiction on said buyer client computer.
33. The computer-readable medium of Claim 32, further comprising the computer-executable instructions of:
receiving a buy notice from said buyer client computer; and transmitting a purchase order to one or more of said seller computers of said plurality of seller client computers.
receiving a buy notice from said buyer client computer; and transmitting a purchase order to one or more of said seller computers of said plurality of seller client computers.
34. The computer-readable medium of Claim 32, further comprising computer-executable instructions of:
receiving a plurality of product specification data sets from a plurality of buyer client computers; and combining said plurality of product specification data sets, thereby creating one request for quote.
receiving a plurality of product specification data sets from a plurality of buyer client computers; and combining said plurality of product specification data sets, thereby creating one request for quote.
35. The computer-readable medium of Claim 32, further comprising computer-executable instruction of, receiving an additional price data set from the seller client computer, wherein the additional price data is a result from a renegotiated price.
36. The computer-readable medium of Claim 32, further comprising computer-executable instruction of, storing the normalized price data set in a database communicatively connected to the server.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/607,502 | 2000-06-28 | ||
US09/607,502 US7043457B1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2000-06-28 | System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2351595A1 true CA2351595A1 (en) | 2001-12-28 |
Family
ID=24432548
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2351595 Abandoned CA2351595A1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2001-06-26 | System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (21) | US7043457B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2351595A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6823320B1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2004-11-23 | Marc Rubin | Automated valuation system and method |
CN110009271A (en) * | 2019-02-14 | 2019-07-12 | 南京中理外轮理货有限公司 | A kind of intelligence tally cloud platform system |
Families Citing this family (131)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NZ297157A (en) | 1994-10-21 | 1999-08-30 | Nps Pharma Inc | Amine derivatives with calcium ion receptor activity; medicaments containing such compounds |
US7046682B2 (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2006-05-16 | Elster Electricity, Llc. | Network-enabled, extensible metering system |
US8036943B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2011-10-11 | Walker Digital, Llc | Systems and methods for providing transferable item prices |
US7043457B1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2006-05-09 | Probuild, Inc. | System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing |
US7353188B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2008-04-01 | Lg Electronics | Product selling system and method for operating the same |
WO2002079904A2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-10 | Espeed, Inc. | Request for quote (rfq) and inside markets |
EP1267293A1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2002-12-18 | eSpeed, Inc. | Systems and methods for trading in an exclusive market |
US7319991B2 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2008-01-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computerized cost estimate system and method |
CA2969278C (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2018-07-10 | Canadian National Railway Company | System and method for conducting an online rail-service ordering transaction |
US20030154101A1 (en) * | 2002-02-13 | 2003-08-14 | Archibald Kevin Carl | System, methods, and medium for facilitating providing a quote |
US20030187716A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and visual user interface for interactive visual analysis of business expenditure |
US7284204B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2007-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method, and visual user interface for evaluating and selecting suppliers for enterprise procurement |
US20040044591A1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2004-03-04 | Gilliland Ramelle L. | Method and system for electronic procurement involving electronic requests for quotation |
US8655755B2 (en) * | 2003-10-22 | 2014-02-18 | Scottrade, Inc. | System and method for the automated brokerage of financial instruments |
US7890412B2 (en) * | 2003-11-04 | 2011-02-15 | New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | Distributed trading bus architecture |
US20050216365A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2005-09-29 | Mainstreet Exchange | Exchange system |
US20060100896A1 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-05-11 | Lahey Jesse M | Web based restaurant management |
US20060107228A1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2006-05-18 | General Electric Company | Method for creating data files |
US9821344B2 (en) | 2004-12-10 | 2017-11-21 | Ikan Holdings Llc | Systems and methods for scanning information from storage area contents |
CA2650493A1 (en) | 2005-04-23 | 2006-11-02 | Isra, Llc | Enhanced business and inventory management systems |
US7660745B2 (en) * | 2005-05-13 | 2010-02-09 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | System and method for price analysis and negotiation |
US20070171232A1 (en) * | 2005-06-13 | 2007-07-26 | Malloy Steven J | System and method for collecting and distributing market information |
US7801810B2 (en) | 2005-11-18 | 2010-09-21 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Hybrid cross-margining |
US20070118455A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-05-24 | Albert William J | System and method for directed request for quote |
US10726479B2 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2020-07-28 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | System and method for centralized clearing of over the counter foreign exchange instruments |
US7734538B2 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2010-06-08 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Multiple quote risk management |
US7774250B1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2010-08-10 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing valid responses to requests for quotations |
US8583538B2 (en) | 2005-11-23 | 2013-11-12 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Providing valid responses to requests for quotations |
WO2007140465A2 (en) * | 2006-05-31 | 2007-12-06 | Silvaris Corporation | System and method for displaying wood products for purchase |
US7689471B2 (en) * | 2006-05-31 | 2010-03-30 | Silvaris Corporation | Medium and method providing the ability to display or hide a wood load from buyer view |
US9286639B1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2016-03-15 | Intuit Inc. | System and method for providing price information |
US8756146B2 (en) | 2007-08-20 | 2014-06-17 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Out of band credit control |
US7996301B2 (en) | 2007-08-20 | 2011-08-09 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | Out of band credit control |
US7987135B2 (en) * | 2007-08-20 | 2011-07-26 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | Out of band credit control |
US8762252B2 (en) | 2007-08-20 | 2014-06-24 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Out of band credit control |
US8452733B2 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2013-05-28 | Oracle International Corporation | Data decay management |
US20100106545A1 (en) * | 2008-10-27 | 2010-04-29 | Noblis, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating evaluation in an acquisition process |
US8229835B2 (en) * | 2009-01-08 | 2012-07-24 | New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | Determination of implied orders in a trade matching system |
US8600857B2 (en) | 2009-01-21 | 2013-12-03 | Truaxis, Inc. | System and method for providing a savings opportunity in association with a financial account |
US20100185489A1 (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2010-07-22 | Satyavolu Ramakrishna V | Method for determining a personalized true cost of service offerings |
US20110246268A1 (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2011-10-06 | Billshrink, Inc. | System and method for providing an opportunity to assess alternative offerings related to a financial transaction |
US20110246281A1 (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2011-10-06 | Billshrink, Inc. | System and method for providing a savings opportunity in association with a financial account |
US10594870B2 (en) | 2009-01-21 | 2020-03-17 | Truaxis, Llc | System and method for matching a savings opportunity using census data |
US10504126B2 (en) | 2009-01-21 | 2019-12-10 | Truaxis, Llc | System and method of obtaining merchant sales information for marketing or sales teams |
US10424000B2 (en) * | 2009-05-30 | 2019-09-24 | Edmond K. Chow | Methods and systems for annotation of digital information |
CN101956647B (en) * | 2009-07-15 | 2012-12-19 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Tidal power generating device |
US8417618B2 (en) * | 2009-09-03 | 2013-04-09 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Utilizing a trigger order with multiple counterparties in implied market trading |
US8266030B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2012-09-11 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Transformation of a multi-leg security definition for calculation of implied orders in an electronic trading system |
US8255305B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2012-08-28 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Ratio spreads for contracts of different sizes in implied market trading |
US20110066537A1 (en) * | 2009-09-15 | 2011-03-17 | Andrew Milne | Implied volume analyzer |
US8229838B2 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2012-07-24 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. | Leg pricer |
US8271344B1 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2012-09-18 | Intuit Inc. | Budget driven purchase monitor |
US8548868B1 (en) * | 2010-04-26 | 2013-10-01 | Mark Lawrence | Method and apparatus to aggregrate demand for buyer specified goods and services |
US20120095829A1 (en) * | 2010-10-15 | 2012-04-19 | Joseph Bradley Harper | Systems and Methods for Managing Contracts and Contract Bids |
US8676739B2 (en) * | 2010-11-11 | 2014-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining a preferred node in a classification and regression tree for use in a predictive analysis |
US8650051B2 (en) | 2010-11-16 | 2014-02-11 | Coral Building Knowledge, LLC | Systems and methods for insurance verification |
TWI464701B (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2014-12-11 | Shao Yin Cheng | Method of competitive bidding for hotel stay products |
US20140207525A1 (en) * | 2011-02-15 | 2014-07-24 | Dell Products L.P. | Method and Apparatus to Calculate Social Pricing Index to Determine Product Pricing in Real-Time |
US10740772B2 (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2020-08-11 | Prevedere, Inc. | Systems and methods for forecasting based upon time series data |
US10896388B2 (en) | 2011-07-25 | 2021-01-19 | Prevedere, Inc. | Systems and methods for business analytics management and modeling |
US10565629B2 (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2020-02-18 | Carrier Services Group, Inc. | Computerized valuation of electronic equipment |
US20130144689A1 (en) * | 2011-12-06 | 2013-06-06 | Green Star Hub | Aggregated Customer Grouping |
US20130297531A1 (en) * | 2012-05-02 | 2013-11-07 | Imageworks Interactive | Device for modifying various types of assets |
US20130331961A1 (en) * | 2012-06-11 | 2013-12-12 | General Electric Company | Data exchange system providing flexible and robust handling of units of measure |
US20140019303A1 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2014-01-16 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Comparison of Product Information |
WO2014036569A1 (en) * | 2012-09-03 | 2014-03-06 | Michael Gurin | Dynamic sales system and method with automated feedback negotiation |
US11341749B2 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2022-05-24 | Avaya Inc. | System and method to identify visitors and provide contextual services |
US9792035B2 (en) * | 2012-10-09 | 2017-10-17 | Mastercard International Incorporated | System and method for payment using a mobile device |
WO2014087376A1 (en) * | 2012-12-06 | 2014-06-12 | Schmahl Wayne Gary | Ordering system and method |
US20140279175A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | James C. Graf | Quibl Order Process System |
US9836789B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-12-05 | Integral Development Corporation | Method and system for generating and operating hybrid markets and user-defined marketplaces |
WO2015050585A1 (en) * | 2013-05-24 | 2015-04-09 | Shrimp Trader, Inc. | Methods and systems for product management |
US9811845B2 (en) | 2013-06-11 | 2017-11-07 | Sap Se | System for accelerated price master database lookup |
US10672053B1 (en) * | 2013-08-19 | 2020-06-02 | Michael J. Clemmens | Systems, manufactures, and methods for comparative bid analysis and purchase order preparation |
US20150120482A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-04-30 | Elias Kourpas | Efficient Electronic Procurement Using Mathematical Optimization in an Electronic Marketplace |
US20160267603A1 (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2016-09-15 | Goldquest Refinement Services Ltd | Systems and Methods for Tracking and Validating Commodities Purchases |
US20150302424A1 (en) * | 2014-04-18 | 2015-10-22 | Mavatar Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing content provider-driven shopping |
CN105450583B (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2019-07-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of method and device of authentification of message |
CN105446992A (en) * | 2014-07-08 | 2016-03-30 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for building goods object recovery information database and determining value information |
CN105450411B (en) | 2014-08-14 | 2019-01-08 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | The method, apparatus and system of authentication are carried out using card feature |
US11308544B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2022-04-19 | Monjeri Investments, Llc | System and method to generate shoppable content and increase advertising revenue in social networking using contextual advertising |
US10127240B2 (en) * | 2014-10-17 | 2018-11-13 | Zestfinance, Inc. | API for implementing scoring functions |
CN105719183A (en) | 2014-12-03 | 2016-06-29 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Directional transfer method and apparatus |
CN105869043A (en) | 2015-01-19 | 2016-08-17 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Disperse hot spot database account transfer-in and transfer-out accounting method and device |
CN105989467A (en) | 2015-02-03 | 2016-10-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Wireless payment method, apparatus, vehicle ride fee check method and system |
US10445343B2 (en) * | 2015-07-16 | 2019-10-15 | Interactive Data Pricing And Reference Data Llc | Systems and methods for data exchange and conversion |
US10546340B1 (en) * | 2015-10-06 | 2020-01-28 | Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company | Systems and methods for assessing needs |
CN106570009B (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2020-07-28 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Navigation category updating method and device |
US10803507B1 (en) * | 2015-11-23 | 2020-10-13 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System for generating output comparing attributes of items |
JP6788349B2 (en) * | 2016-01-14 | 2020-11-25 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Plant evaluation equipment and plant evaluation method |
US10311507B2 (en) * | 2016-01-20 | 2019-06-04 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Reconfigurable user interface for product analysis |
CN114625076A (en) | 2016-05-09 | 2022-06-14 | 强力物联网投资组合2016有限公司 | Method and system for industrial internet of things |
US11327475B2 (en) | 2016-05-09 | 2022-05-10 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, Llc | Methods and systems for intelligent collection and analysis of vehicle data |
US10754334B2 (en) | 2016-05-09 | 2020-08-25 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, Llc | Methods and systems for industrial internet of things data collection for process adjustment in an upstream oil and gas environment |
US11774944B2 (en) | 2016-05-09 | 2023-10-03 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, Llc | Methods and systems for the industrial internet of things |
US10983507B2 (en) | 2016-05-09 | 2021-04-20 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, Llc | Method for data collection and frequency analysis with self-organization functionality |
US10374872B2 (en) * | 2016-05-24 | 2019-08-06 | Apstra, Inc. | Configuring system resources for different reference architectures |
US11237546B2 (en) | 2016-06-15 | 2022-02-01 | Strong Force loT Portfolio 2016, LLC | Method and system of modifying a data collection trajectory for vehicles |
US10496973B2 (en) * | 2016-07-29 | 2019-12-03 | Square, Inc. | Reprogrammable point-of-sale transaction flows |
US10872320B2 (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2020-12-22 | Square, Inc. | Reprogrammable point-of-sale transaction flows |
US10692055B2 (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2020-06-23 | Square, Inc. | Reprogrammable point-of-sale transaction flows |
US11443250B1 (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2022-09-13 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Conservation of electronic communications resources via selective publication of substantially continuously updated data over a communications network |
US11182736B2 (en) | 2017-05-01 | 2021-11-23 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | System and method for smart inventory capture |
US10345818B2 (en) | 2017-05-12 | 2019-07-09 | Autonomy Squared Llc | Robot transport method with transportation container |
CN109299950B (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2021-10-15 | 中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所 | Flexibly configurable quality inspection management method and system |
US10678233B2 (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2020-06-09 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, Llc | Systems and methods for data collection and data sharing in an industrial environment |
EP3662331A4 (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2021-04-28 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, LLC | Methods and systems for detection in an industrial internet of things data collection environment with large data sets |
TWI672664B (en) * | 2017-12-15 | 2019-09-21 | 鄭少茵 | Negotiation system and method of travel products |
US11182852B1 (en) * | 2017-12-20 | 2021-11-23 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Exchange computing system including a reference rate generation unit |
CN108734371A (en) | 2018-02-12 | 2018-11-02 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of processing method, device and equipment for air control instruction |
CN108632348B (en) | 2018-03-19 | 2020-02-18 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Service checking method and device |
US20190392494A1 (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2019-12-26 | General Electric Company | System and method relating to part pricing and procurement |
US11194832B2 (en) * | 2018-09-13 | 2021-12-07 | Sap Se | Normalization of unstructured catalog data |
CN109299096A (en) * | 2018-09-25 | 2019-02-01 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of processing method of pipelined data, device and equipment |
US20200160244A1 (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-21 | Simple Lobby LLC | System and Method for Unsolicited Offer Management |
CN109492149B (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2021-04-09 | 深圳大宇无限科技有限公司 | Crawler task processing method and device |
CN110035108B (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2022-01-28 | 创新先进技术有限公司 | Information pushing method and system |
US11423465B2 (en) * | 2019-01-07 | 2022-08-23 | Masters Choice | Systems and methods for facilitating agricultural transactions |
WO2020194204A1 (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2020-10-01 | Gowda Sachin Hegdekudgi Dakappa | System and method for determining grade of a product |
WO2020209865A1 (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2020-10-15 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for implementing a consolidated contributions data bridge for outbound market and reference data |
CN112308720A (en) * | 2019-08-02 | 2021-02-02 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining participants in Federal learning alliance |
CN110458669A (en) * | 2019-08-15 | 2019-11-15 | 车迅联(东莞)网络科技有限公司 | Based on the intelligence s ervice platform between car owner, Automobile Service shops and auto-parts supplier |
US11216778B2 (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2022-01-04 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Automatic detection of disruptive orders for a supply chain |
US20210152555A1 (en) * | 2019-11-20 | 2021-05-20 | Royal Bank Of Canada | System and method for unauthorized activity detection |
TWI739242B (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2021-09-11 | 財團法人工業技術研究院 | System for visualized storage configuration and method thereof |
US11269910B2 (en) * | 2020-01-31 | 2022-03-08 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Methods, apparatuses and computer program products for data retrieval in a group-based communication system |
JP2021157666A (en) * | 2020-03-27 | 2021-10-07 | 横河電機株式会社 | Information display, method for displaying information, and program |
WO2022097123A1 (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2022-05-12 | QMO IP Pty Ltd. | System and methods for dynamically automating reverse auctions |
US11687519B2 (en) | 2021-08-11 | 2023-06-27 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Ensuring availability and integrity of a database across geographical regions |
CN113888327A (en) * | 2021-09-30 | 2022-01-04 | 天津大学 | Energy internet transaction method and system based on reinforcement learning block chain energizing |
US11574336B1 (en) * | 2022-03-11 | 2023-02-07 | Rx Paradigm Inc. | Apparatus for secure decentralized rebate management |
Family Cites Families (252)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1927702A (en) | 1932-12-03 | 1933-09-19 | Int Communications Lab Inc | Average price computer |
US3581072A (en) | 1968-03-28 | 1971-05-25 | Frederick Nymeyer | Auction market computation system |
US3933305A (en) | 1974-08-23 | 1976-01-20 | John Michael Murphy | Asset value calculators |
US4412287A (en) | 1975-05-29 | 1983-10-25 | Braddock Iii Walter D | Automated stock exchange |
US4486853A (en) | 1981-04-01 | 1984-12-04 | Telemet American, Inc. | Apparatus for receiving and displaying continuously updated data |
US4903201A (en) | 1983-11-03 | 1990-02-20 | World Energy Exchange Corporation | Automated futures trading exchange |
US4868866A (en) | 1984-12-28 | 1989-09-19 | Mcgraw-Hill Inc. | Broadcast data distribution system |
US4674044A (en) | 1985-01-30 | 1987-06-16 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. | Automated securities trading system |
JPS62139088A (en) * | 1985-12-13 | 1987-06-22 | Fujitsu Ltd | Input data checking system |
US4972504A (en) | 1988-02-11 | 1990-11-20 | A. C. Nielsen Company | Marketing research system and method for obtaining retail data on a real time basis |
US4992940A (en) | 1989-03-13 | 1991-02-12 | H-Renee, Incorporated | System and method for automated selection of equipment for purchase through input of user desired specifications |
US5168446A (en) * | 1989-05-23 | 1992-12-01 | Telerate Systems Incorporated | System for conducting and processing spot commodity transactions |
EP0407026B1 (en) | 1989-05-25 | 1995-11-22 | Reuters Limited | Distributed system and method for matching of buyers and sellers |
US5077665A (en) | 1989-05-25 | 1991-12-31 | Reuters Limited | Distributed matching system |
US5136501A (en) | 1989-05-26 | 1992-08-04 | Reuters Limited | Anonymous matching system |
US5101353A (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1992-03-31 | Lattice Investments, Inc. | Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets |
US5063506A (en) | 1989-10-23 | 1991-11-05 | International Business Machines Corp. | Cost optimization system for supplying parts |
US5201047A (en) | 1989-12-21 | 1993-04-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Attribute-based classification and retrieval system |
US5297031A (en) * | 1990-03-06 | 1994-03-22 | Chicago Board Of Trade | Method and apparatus for order management by market brokers |
GB9027249D0 (en) | 1990-12-17 | 1991-02-06 | Reuters Ltd | Offer matching system |
US5249120A (en) | 1991-01-14 | 1993-09-28 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Automated manufacturing costing system and method |
US5172314A (en) | 1991-05-03 | 1992-12-15 | Electronic Retailing Systems International | Apparatus for communicating price changes including printer and display devices |
US7203661B1 (en) | 1992-10-28 | 2007-04-10 | Graff/Ross Holdings | Computers making financial analysis output having property valuations |
US5293479A (en) | 1991-07-08 | 1994-03-08 | Quintero Smith Incorporated | Design tool and method for preparing parametric assemblies |
US5418943A (en) | 1991-10-23 | 1995-05-23 | At&T Corp. | Information system with knowledge base and data base |
US5555403A (en) | 1991-11-27 | 1996-09-10 | Business Objects, S.A. | Relational database access system using semantically dynamic objects |
US5375055A (en) | 1992-02-03 | 1994-12-20 | Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. | Credit management for electronic brokerage system |
US5414621A (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1995-05-09 | Hough; John R. | System and method for computing a comparative value of real estate |
US6134536A (en) | 1992-05-29 | 2000-10-17 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US5515524A (en) | 1993-03-29 | 1996-05-07 | Trilogy Development Group | Method and apparatus for configuring systems |
US6714933B2 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2004-03-30 | Cnet Networks, Inc. | Content aggregation method and apparatus for on-line purchasing system |
US6535880B1 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2003-03-18 | Cnet Networks, Inc. | Automated on-line commerce method and apparatus utilizing a shopping server verifying product information on product selection |
US5794207A (en) | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-11 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers |
US6553346B1 (en) | 1996-09-04 | 2003-04-22 | Priceline.Com Incorporated | Conditional purchase offer (CPO) management system for packages |
US5726914A (en) | 1993-09-01 | 1998-03-10 | Gse Systems, Inc. | Computer implemented process and computer architecture for performance analysis |
US5500793A (en) | 1993-09-02 | 1996-03-19 | Equitrade | Computerized system for developing multi-party property equity exchange scenarios |
CA2112077C (en) | 1993-09-15 | 1999-08-24 | Barry Craig Smith | Network architecture for allocating flight inventory segments and resources |
US5446874A (en) | 1993-12-23 | 1995-08-29 | International Business Machines Corp. | Automated benchmarking with self customization |
US5774879A (en) | 1993-12-27 | 1998-06-30 | First Data Corporation | Automated financial instrument processing system |
EP0750757B1 (en) | 1994-03-17 | 2001-02-14 | Dow Benelux N.V. | System for real time optimization and profit depiction |
US5486995A (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1996-01-23 | Dow Benelux N.V. | System for real time optimization |
US5809483A (en) | 1994-05-13 | 1998-09-15 | Broka; S. William | Online transaction processing system for bond trading |
US5557514A (en) | 1994-06-23 | 1996-09-17 | Medicode, Inc. | Method and system for generating statistically-based medical provider utilization profiles |
US6023683A (en) | 1994-08-10 | 2000-02-08 | Fisher Scientific Company | Electronic sourcing system and method |
GB9416673D0 (en) | 1994-08-17 | 1994-10-12 | Reuters Ltd | Data exchange filtering system |
JPH0877010A (en) | 1994-09-07 | 1996-03-22 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and device for data analysis |
US5826241A (en) * | 1994-09-16 | 1998-10-20 | First Virtual Holdings Incorporated | Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet |
US5675785A (en) | 1994-10-04 | 1997-10-07 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Data warehouse which is accessed by a user using a schema of virtual tables |
US5909543A (en) | 1994-11-30 | 1999-06-01 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Communication conference system and communication conference apparatus |
US5732400A (en) * | 1995-01-04 | 1998-03-24 | Citibank N.A. | System and method for a risk-based purchase of goods |
US5732271A (en) | 1995-01-23 | 1998-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data processing system and method for processing an object oriented development environment employing property inheritance using prototypical objects |
US5845266A (en) | 1995-12-12 | 1998-12-01 | Optimark Technologies, Inc. | Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features |
US7133835B1 (en) | 1995-08-08 | 2006-11-07 | Cxn, Inc. | Online exchange market system with a buyer auction and a seller auction |
ATE252748T1 (en) | 1995-08-28 | 2003-11-15 | Ebs Dealing Resources Inc | ANONYMOUS STOCK TRADING SYSTEM WITH IMPROVED INPUT OPTIONS FOR QUOTES |
US5873069A (en) | 1995-10-13 | 1999-02-16 | American Tv & Appliance Of Madison, Inc. | System and method for automatic updating and display of retail prices |
US5715402A (en) * | 1995-11-09 | 1998-02-03 | Spot Metals Online | Method and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals |
US6519574B1 (en) | 1995-12-12 | 2003-02-11 | Reuters Limited | Electronic trading system featuring arbitrage and third-party credit opportunities |
CA2193582A1 (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1997-06-22 | Aidan O'leary | Order processing method |
US6055518A (en) | 1996-02-01 | 2000-04-25 | At&T Corporation | Secure auction systems |
US5758328A (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1998-05-26 | Giovannoli; Joseph | Computerized quotation system and method |
US6034652A (en) | 1996-03-22 | 2000-03-07 | Interval Research Corporation | Attention manager for occupying the peripheral attention of a person in the vicinity of a display device |
US6505174B1 (en) | 1996-03-25 | 2003-01-07 | Hsx, Inc. | Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function |
US5950176A (en) | 1996-03-25 | 1999-09-07 | Hsx, Inc. | Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function |
US5835896A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-11-10 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US5771370A (en) | 1996-05-14 | 1998-06-23 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | Method and apparatus for optimizing hardware and software co-simulation |
US5924083A (en) | 1996-05-29 | 1999-07-13 | Geneva Branch Of Reuters Transaction Services Limited | Distributed matching system for displaying a book of credit filtered bids and offers |
US6061662A (en) | 1997-08-15 | 2000-05-09 | Options Technology Company, Inc. | Simulation method and system for the valuation of derivative financial instruments |
US5825651A (en) | 1996-09-03 | 1998-10-20 | Trilogy Development Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for maintaining and configuring systems |
US5963910A (en) | 1996-09-20 | 1999-10-05 | Ulwick; Anthony W. | Computer based process for strategy evaluation and optimization based on customer desired outcomes and predictive metrics |
US5764916A (en) | 1996-09-27 | 1998-06-09 | Ichat, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real time communication over a computer network |
US5799300A (en) | 1996-12-12 | 1998-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporations | Method and system for performing range-sum queries on a data cube |
US5822751A (en) | 1996-12-16 | 1998-10-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient multidimensional data aggregation operator implementation |
US6460020B1 (en) | 1996-12-30 | 2002-10-01 | De Technologies, Inc. | Universal shopping center for international operation |
US6865524B1 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2005-03-08 | Trilogy Development Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for attribute selection |
US6038537A (en) * | 1997-03-19 | 2000-03-14 | Fujitsu Limited | Intra-organization cooperation system, commodity deal management method, and storage medium |
US6032158A (en) | 1997-05-02 | 2000-02-29 | Informatica Corporation | Apparatus and method for capturing and propagating changes from an operational database to data marts |
US5873071A (en) | 1997-05-15 | 1999-02-16 | Itg Inc. | Computer method and system for intermediated exchange of commodities |
US5999940A (en) | 1997-05-28 | 1999-12-07 | Home Information Services, Inc. | Interactive information discovery tool and methodology |
US6205447B1 (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2001-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Relational database management of multi-dimensional data |
US6014647A (en) | 1997-07-08 | 2000-01-11 | Nizzari; Marcia M. | Customer interaction tracking |
US7711604B1 (en) | 1997-07-08 | 2010-05-04 | Walker Digital, Llc | Retail system for selling products based on a flexible product description |
US5991696A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 1999-11-23 | American Air Liquide Inc. | Method for intelligent data acquisition in a measurement system |
US6058379A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2000-05-02 | Auction Source, L.L.C. | Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation |
US6049783A (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2000-04-11 | Power Financial Group, Inc. | Interactive internet analysis method |
JP3753207B2 (en) | 1997-08-11 | 2006-03-08 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Collaborative work support system and collaborative work support method |
US6094651A (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2000-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Discovery-driven exploration of OLAP data cubes |
US5960411A (en) | 1997-09-12 | 1999-09-28 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network |
US6442533B1 (en) | 1997-10-29 | 2002-08-27 | William H. Hinkle | Multi-processing financial transaction processing system |
US5987435A (en) | 1997-10-30 | 1999-11-16 | Case Shiller Weiss, Inc. | Proxy asset data processor |
US6049822A (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2000-04-11 | Selectica, Inc. | Method for generating and updating knowledge-based configurators that are multi platform and multi language capable |
US6233609B1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-05-15 | Selectica, Inc | Method and apparatus for remote interaction with and configuration of a wan-based knowledge base |
US6535913B2 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2003-03-18 | Selectica, Inc. | Method and apparatus for use of an application state storage system in interacting with on-line services |
US6339775B1 (en) | 1997-11-07 | 2002-01-15 | Informatica Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing |
US6064982A (en) | 1997-11-12 | 2000-05-16 | Netscape Communication Corporation | Smart configurator |
US7376578B1 (en) | 1997-11-19 | 2008-05-20 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Computer-implemented product valuation tool |
WO1999027556A2 (en) | 1997-11-20 | 1999-06-03 | Xacct Technologies, Inc. | Network accounting and billing system and method |
US5857174A (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 1999-01-05 | Dugan; John W. | Real estate appraisal method and device for standardizing real property marketing analysis by using pre-adjusted appraised comparable sales |
US6654747B1 (en) | 1997-12-02 | 2003-11-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Modular scalable system for managing data in a heterogeneous environment with generic structure for control repository access transactions |
US6035287A (en) | 1997-12-17 | 2000-03-07 | Omega Consulting, Inc. | Method and apparatus for bundled asset trading |
US7124106B1 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 2006-10-17 | Omega Consulting, Inc. | Apparatus for trading of bundled assets including bundle substitution and method therefor |
US6484158B1 (en) | 1997-12-19 | 2002-11-19 | A.C. Nielsen Company | Dynamic rule based market research database |
US6085196A (en) | 1997-12-23 | 2000-07-04 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Object-oriented system and computer program product for mapping structured information to different structured information |
US6078924A (en) | 1998-01-30 | 2000-06-20 | Aeneid Corporation | Method and apparatus for performing data collection, interpretation and analysis, in an information platform |
US6161103A (en) | 1998-05-06 | 2000-12-12 | Epiphany, Inc. | Method and apparatus for creating aggregates for use in a datamart |
US7031901B2 (en) | 1998-05-13 | 2006-04-18 | Abu El Ata Nabil A | System and method for improving predictive modeling of an information system |
US7389211B2 (en) | 1998-05-13 | 2008-06-17 | Abu El Ata Nabil A | System and method of predictive modeling for managing decisions for business enterprises |
US6311144B1 (en) | 1998-05-13 | 2001-10-30 | Nabil A. Abu El Ata | Method and apparatus for designing and analyzing information systems using multi-layer mathematical models |
US7603286B2 (en) | 1998-05-21 | 2009-10-13 | Sap Ag | Demand-model based price image calculation method and computer program therefor |
US6609098B1 (en) | 1998-07-02 | 2003-08-19 | Ita Software, Inc. | Pricing graph representation for sets of pricing solutions for travel planning system |
US6175619B1 (en) | 1998-07-08 | 2001-01-16 | At&T Corp. | Anonymous voice communication using on-line controls |
US6076070A (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-06-13 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | Apparatus and method for on-line price comparison of competitor's goods and/or services over a computer network |
US6976006B1 (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2005-12-13 | Chhedi Lal Verma | Method and apparatus for presenting price comparison to prospective buyers |
AU6037699A (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2000-04-03 | Talpx, Inc. | Techniques for trading commodities on a private trading system and not regulatedby the government |
US7249085B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2007-07-24 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with multi-parameter price equalization bidding |
US7383206B2 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2008-06-03 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multiple variable bidding in an online auction |
US6167383A (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2000-12-26 | Dell Usa, Lp | Method and apparatus for providing customer configured machines at an internet site |
US6317728B1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2001-11-13 | Richard L. Kane | Securities and commodities trading system |
US6125391A (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2000-09-26 | Commerce One, Inc. | Market makers using documents for commerce in trading partner networks |
US6618707B1 (en) | 1998-11-03 | 2003-09-09 | International Securities Exchange, Inc. | Automated exchange for trading derivative securities |
US6377940B2 (en) * | 1998-11-05 | 2002-04-23 | International Securities Exchange, Llc | Method and apparatus for setting a price for a security on an automated exchange based on a comparison of prices on other exchanges |
US6134548A (en) | 1998-11-19 | 2000-10-17 | Ac Properties B.V. | System, method and article of manufacture for advanced mobile bargain shopping |
US6141653A (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2000-10-31 | Tradeaccess Inc | System for interative, multivariate negotiations over a network |
US6285997B1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2001-09-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query optimization with deferred update and autonomous sources |
US6336105B1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2002-01-01 | Trade Access Inc. | System and method for representing data and providing electronic non-repudiation in a negotiations system |
US6341277B1 (en) | 1998-11-17 | 2002-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for performance complex heterogeneous database queries using a single SQL expression |
US6393605B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2002-05-21 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and system for efficient delivery and deployment of an application |
US6260024B1 (en) | 1998-12-02 | 2001-07-10 | Gary Shkedy | Method and apparatus for facilitating buyer-driven purchase orders on a commercial network system |
US6415263B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2002-07-02 | Ncr Corporation | System and methods for determining and displaying product pricing |
US7107226B1 (en) | 1999-01-20 | 2006-09-12 | Net32.Com, Inc. | Internet-based on-line comparison shopping system and method of interactive purchase and sale of products |
US6411936B1 (en) | 1999-02-05 | 2002-06-25 | Nval Solutions, Inc. | Enterprise value enhancement system and method |
US6408282B1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2002-06-18 | Wit Capital Corp. | System and method for conducting securities transactions over a computer network |
US6963854B1 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2005-11-08 | Manugistics, Inc. | Target pricing system |
US7617144B2 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2009-11-10 | Primex Holdings Llc | Auction market with price improvement mechanism |
US7742934B2 (en) | 1999-03-25 | 2010-06-22 | Travelocity.Com Lp | Methods and apparatus for determining non-obvious savings in the purchase of goods and services |
US6101484A (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2000-08-08 | Mercata, Inc. | Dynamic market equilibrium management system, process and article of manufacture |
US7010511B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2006-03-07 | Kinney Jr Sam E | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with net present value bidding |
US7840476B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2010-11-23 | Ariba, Inc. | Transformation bidding with tooling requirements |
JP3788100B2 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2006-06-21 | 富士通株式会社 | Electronic commerce system and computer-readable recording medium |
US7212999B2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2007-05-01 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | User interface for an electronic trading system |
US6993504B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2006-01-31 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | User interface for semi-fungible trading |
US8126779B2 (en) | 1999-04-11 | 2012-02-28 | William Paul Wanker | Machine implemented methods of ranking merchants |
US6278982B1 (en) | 1999-04-21 | 2001-08-21 | Lava Trading Inc. | Securities trading system for consolidation of trading on multiple ECNS and electronic exchanges |
US7392214B1 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2008-06-24 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Systems and methods for trading |
US6163774A (en) | 1999-05-24 | 2000-12-19 | Platinum Technology Ip, Inc. | Method and apparatus for simplified and flexible selection of aggregate and cross product levels for a data warehouse |
US6381605B1 (en) | 1999-05-29 | 2002-04-30 | Oracle Corporation | Heirarchical indexing of multi-attribute data by sorting, dividing and storing subsets |
US7039040B1 (en) | 1999-06-07 | 2006-05-02 | At&T Corp. | Voice-over-IP enabled chat |
US6564192B1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2003-05-13 | Freemarkets, Inc. | Method and system for differential index bidding in online auctions |
DE59913062D1 (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2006-04-06 | Ivyteam Ag Zug | Information technology system for the definition, optimization and control of processes |
US6862580B1 (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2005-03-01 | Robert M. Ford | System and method for managing tier-priced commodity transactions |
US6347307B1 (en) | 1999-06-14 | 2002-02-12 | Integral Development Corp. | System and method for conducting web-based financial transactions in capital markets |
US6629082B1 (en) | 1999-06-15 | 2003-09-30 | W.R. Hambrecht & Co. | Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation |
US6477536B1 (en) | 1999-06-22 | 2002-11-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Virtual cubes |
US7024376B1 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 2006-04-04 | Yuen Henry C | Internet-based auction method |
US7330826B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2008-02-12 | Perfect.Com, Inc. | Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet |
US7296001B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2007-11-13 | Ariba, Inc. | Electronic multilateral negotiation system |
US6385604B1 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 2002-05-07 | Hyperroll, Israel Limited | Relational database management system having integrated non-relational multi-dimensional data store of aggregated data elements |
US6907404B1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2005-06-14 | Wsetport Financial Llc. | Automated investment chart pattern search system for technical analysis |
US20030093343A1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2003-05-15 | Sidley Austin Brown & Wood Llp | Dynamic order visibility system for the trading of assets |
US7769612B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2010-08-03 | Priceline.Com, Incorporated | System and method for facilitating the sale of a travel product |
US7685048B1 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2010-03-23 | Bloomberg L.P. | Electronic trading system for forwards spread trades |
US6415270B1 (en) | 1999-09-03 | 2002-07-02 | Omnihub, Inc. | Multiple auction coordination method and system |
US6807565B1 (en) | 1999-09-03 | 2004-10-19 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Instant messaging system using voice enabled web based application server |
US6389407B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2002-05-14 | General Electric Company | Method for documenting engineering rules |
US6892186B1 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2005-05-10 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Auction method and apparatus for electronic commerce |
US6847938B1 (en) | 1999-09-20 | 2005-01-25 | Donna R. Moore | Method of exchanging goods over the internet |
US7577582B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2009-08-18 | Nextag, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for facilitating transactions |
US8407116B1 (en) | 1999-09-23 | 2013-03-26 | The Nasdaq Omx Group, Inc. | Quote/order processing in electronic market system |
US7181424B1 (en) | 1999-09-23 | 2007-02-20 | The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. | Montage for automated market system |
US6990238B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2006-01-24 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Data processing, analysis, and visualization system for use with disparate data types |
US6339776B2 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2002-01-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic semi-structured repository for mining software and software-related information |
US6792458B1 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2004-09-14 | Urchin Software Corporation | System and method for monitoring and analyzing internet traffic |
US6505175B1 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2003-01-07 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Order centric tracking system |
US7171386B1 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2007-01-30 | Rfv Holdings | Real-time commodity trading method and apparatus |
US7251629B1 (en) | 1999-10-14 | 2007-07-31 | Edge Capture, Llc | Automated trading system in an electronic trading exchange |
US6856967B1 (en) | 1999-10-21 | 2005-02-15 | Mercexchange, Llc | Generating and navigating streaming dynamic pricing information |
US7373317B1 (en) | 1999-10-27 | 2008-05-13 | Ebay, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating sales of goods by independent parties |
US20020069134A1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2002-06-06 | Neal Solomon | System, method and apparatus for aggregation of cooperative intelligent agents for procurement in a distributed network |
US20030233305A1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-12-18 | Neal Solomon | System, method and apparatus for information collaboration between intelligent agents in a distributed network |
US7072857B1 (en) | 1999-11-06 | 2006-07-04 | Cynthia Calonge | Method for providing online submission of requests for proposals for forwarding to identified vendors |
US6556976B1 (en) | 1999-11-10 | 2003-04-29 | Gershman, Brickner And Bratton, Inc. | Method and system for e-commerce and related data management, analysis and reporting |
US6677963B1 (en) | 1999-11-16 | 2004-01-13 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Computer-executable method for improving understanding of business data by interactive rule manipulation |
US7386497B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2008-06-10 | Gfi Group, Inc. | System and method for trading an instrument |
US6725257B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2004-04-20 | Chrome Data Corporation | Computationally efficient process and apparatus for configuring a product over a computer network |
US20010032163A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-10-18 | Michael Fertik | Method and apparatus for open market trading |
US7509261B1 (en) | 1999-12-06 | 2009-03-24 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation | Method for forecasting house prices using a dynamic error correction model |
AU2589401A (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2001-07-03 | Net Horsepower, Inc. | Method and apparatus for internet connectivity for agriculture buyers, sellers and transporters |
US6510434B1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2003-01-21 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | System and method for retrieving information from a database using an index of XML tags and metafiles |
US7536335B1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2009-05-19 | Bloomberg L.P. | System and method for implementing foreign exchange currency forwards |
US7206756B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2007-04-17 | Trilogy Development Group, Inc. | System and method for facilitating commercial transactions over a data network |
US7233923B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2007-06-19 | Espeed, Inc. | Systems and methods for matching desired purchases and sales of mis-matched items |
US8554659B2 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2013-10-08 | Tradecapture Otc Corp. | System for trading commodities and the like |
US7024383B1 (en) | 2000-01-31 | 2006-04-04 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Online sales risk management system |
US7835970B1 (en) | 2000-02-02 | 2010-11-16 | Cmvt, Llc | Method and system for automated auction and tender of complex multi-variable commodities |
US7430531B1 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2008-09-30 | Verisign, Inc. | System and method for assisting customers in choosing a bundled set of commodities using customer preferences |
US6618714B1 (en) | 2000-02-10 | 2003-09-09 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for recommending electronic component connectivity configurations and other information |
US20010032116A1 (en) | 2000-02-11 | 2001-10-18 | Geoffrey Hyatt | System and method for providing information on market pricing |
US7249157B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2007-07-24 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Collaboration system for exchanging of data between electronic participants via collaboration space by using a URL to identify a combination of both collaboration space and business protocol |
US20030018550A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2003-01-23 | Rotman Frank Lewis | Methods and systems for providing transaction data |
US7113919B1 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2006-09-26 | Chemdomain, Inc. | System and method for configuring products over a communications network |
US20010032171A1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2001-10-18 | Brink Jerry Ten | System and method for trading commodities |
US7979347B1 (en) | 2000-03-16 | 2011-07-12 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Automated online sales risk management |
US20050010494A1 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2005-01-13 | Pricegrabber.Com | Method and apparatus for Internet e-commerce shopping guide |
US6941280B1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2005-09-06 | The American Stock Exchange, Llc | Determining intra-day net asset value of an actively managed exchange traded fund |
US7472087B2 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2008-12-30 | Stikine Technology, Llc | Trading program for interacting with market programs on a platform |
AU2001251500A1 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2001-10-23 | Eastman Chemical Company | Systems and methods for facilitating transactions in a commodity marketplace |
CA2406418C (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2017-07-11 | Superderivatives, Inc. | Method and system for pricing options |
US7216092B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2007-05-08 | Deluxe Corporation | Intelligent personalization system and method |
US7003486B1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2006-02-21 | Neha Net Corp. | Net-value creation and allocation in an electronic trading system |
AU2001257077A1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2001-10-30 | Brio Technology, Inc. | Analytical server including metrics engine |
US7212996B1 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2007-05-01 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for dynamic, multivariable comparison of financial products |
US20040015415A1 (en) | 2000-04-21 | 2004-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, program product, and method for comparison shopping with dynamic pricing over a network |
US7376613B1 (en) | 2000-04-21 | 2008-05-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Business method for comparison shopping with dynamic pricing over a network |
US6604107B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2003-08-05 | Ebay Inc. | Generic attribute database system for storing items of different categories having shared attributes |
US7058598B1 (en) | 2000-04-30 | 2006-06-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Web price optimizer of multiple-item package orders for e-commerce on the internet and method of use |
US7742959B2 (en) * | 2000-05-01 | 2010-06-22 | Mueller Ulrich A | Filtering of high frequency time series data |
US7467110B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2008-12-16 | The Olsen Group | Method for market making |
US7689495B1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2010-03-30 | Bloomberg L.P. | System and method for processing trades using volume-weighted-average pricing techniques |
AU2001261187A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2001-11-12 | American International Group, Inc. | Method and system for initiating and clearing trades |
US7970713B1 (en) * | 2000-05-10 | 2011-06-28 | OIP Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatic pricing in electronic commerce |
US7246092B1 (en) | 2000-05-12 | 2007-07-17 | The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. | Montage for an electronic market |
US7908200B2 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2011-03-15 | Versata Development Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficiently generating electronic requests for quote |
US7653583B1 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2010-01-26 | Versata Development Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for filtering and/or sorting responses to electronic requests for quote |
AU2001261754A1 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2001-12-03 | Manugistic Atlanta, Inc. | Dynamic pricing system |
US6546402B1 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2003-04-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for asynchronous view maintenance |
US20020007324A1 (en) | 2000-06-09 | 2002-01-17 | Centner David J. | System and method for effectively conducting transactions between buyers and suppliers |
US7212997B1 (en) | 2000-06-09 | 2007-05-01 | Ari Pine | System and method for analyzing financial market data |
US20020152135A1 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2002-10-17 | Yishai Beeri | System and method for e-commerce interface with controlled e-commerce interactions |
US6850900B1 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2005-02-01 | Gary W. Hare | Full service secure commercial electronic marketplace |
US7043457B1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2006-05-09 | Probuild, Inc. | System and method for managing and evaluating network commodities purchasing |
US8005684B1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2011-08-23 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for estimating a used vehicle's market value |
US7765140B1 (en) | 2000-08-08 | 2010-07-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for enhancing buyers performance in electronic commerce |
US20020026630A1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2002-02-28 | John Schmidt | Enterprise application integration methodology |
US7149717B1 (en) * | 2000-10-26 | 2006-12-12 | Kan Steven S | Method and system to effectuate multiple transaction prices for a commodity |
US7379898B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2008-05-27 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | System and method for generating market pricing information for non-fungible items |
US6873968B2 (en) | 2001-02-10 | 2005-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method and computer program product for on-line real-time price comparison and adjustment within a detachable virtual shopping cart |
US20020156685A1 (en) | 2001-02-10 | 2002-10-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automating electronic commerce transactions using a virtual shopping cart |
US20030065586A1 (en) | 2001-07-31 | 2003-04-03 | Shaftel Keith L. | Electronic commerce product pricing and selection system and method |
SE0103642D0 (en) | 2001-11-01 | 2001-11-01 | Om Technology Ab | A method and a system for improved trading of options and futures and combinations thereof |
US20060253334A1 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2006-11-09 | Masahiko Fukasawa | Order placement and acceptance management system |
US20040117291A1 (en) | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-17 | O'callahan Dennis M. | Method of trading derivative investment products based on an index adapted to reflect the relative performance of two different investment assets |
WO2004088476A2 (en) | 2003-03-27 | 2004-10-14 | University Of Washington | Performing predictive pricing based on historical data |
US7660738B1 (en) | 2003-04-28 | 2010-02-09 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Collecting competitive pricing information via a merchant web site for use in setting prices on the merchant web site |
US7702615B1 (en) | 2005-11-04 | 2010-04-20 | M-Factor, Inc. | Creation and aggregation of predicted data |
US7725358B1 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2010-05-25 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | System and method for providing multiple real-time pricing quotes based on optional consumer variables |
US8639605B2 (en) | 2006-04-21 | 2014-01-28 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Systems and methods for the identification and messaging of trading parties |
US20080077542A1 (en) | 2006-09-22 | 2008-03-27 | Second Rotation Inc. | Systems and methods for determining market price of merchandise |
WO2008077074A2 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-26 | Silvaris Corporation | Determining and presenting product market prices |
US8180710B2 (en) | 2007-09-25 | 2012-05-15 | Strichman Adam J | System, method and computer program product for an interactive business services price determination and/or comparison model |
US20100023379A1 (en) | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-28 | HMVP Partners, LLC | Method and system for determining real estate market value changes |
US20100082419A1 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2010-04-01 | David Hsueh-Chi Au-Yeung | Systems and methods of rating an offer for a products |
US7684144B1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2010-03-23 | Quantum Corporation | Multi-rate tracking with a multi-actuator servo control |
US8341058B2 (en) | 2009-01-16 | 2012-12-25 | Future Beef Partners Inc. | System and method for managing a portfolio of different cuts of meat |
-
2000
- 2000-06-28 US US09/607,502 patent/US7043457B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-06-26 CA CA 2351595 patent/CA2351595A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-03-31 US US11/394,540 patent/US7840462B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2010
- 2010-11-22 US US12/952,083 patent/US7966240B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-05-27 US US13/118,351 patent/US8224729B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2012
- 2012-05-18 US US13/475,900 patent/US8321317B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-08-28 US US13/597,200 patent/US8442888B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2013
- 2013-01-17 US US13/744,373 patent/US8635139B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-03-18 US US13/846,945 patent/US8700521B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-04-24 US US13/869,942 patent/US8762258B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2014
- 2014-04-25 US US14/262,682 patent/US9092825B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2015
- 2015-06-16 US US14/740,630 patent/US9418371B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2015-07-24 US US14/808,854 patent/US9412117B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2016
- 2016-08-08 US US15/231,546 patent/US9542689B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2016-08-15 US US15/237,518 patent/US9524495B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2016-09-06 US US15/257,765 patent/US9576296B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2016-12-02 US US15/368,266 patent/US9754244B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-02-28 US US15/445,641 patent/US9710856B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2017-05-24 US US15/604,533 patent/US9904913B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2017-07-03 US US15/641,083 patent/US10055719B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2018
- 2018-08-20 US US16/105,653 patent/US10262307B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2018-08-29 US US16/116,175 patent/US10290008B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6823320B1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2004-11-23 | Marc Rubin | Automated valuation system and method |
CN110009271A (en) * | 2019-02-14 | 2019-07-12 | 南京中理外轮理货有限公司 | A kind of intelligence tally cloud platform system |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10290008B2 (en) | Automated system for adapting market data and producing metric values | |
US7493280B2 (en) | Method and system for setting an optimal reserve price for an auction | |
US7062460B1 (en) | On-line auction method and system facilitating the sale of multiple product units at prices varying with volume | |
US20020002523A1 (en) | Online patent and license exchange | |
US20010034663A1 (en) | Electronic contract broker and contract market maker infrastructure | |
US20030204465A1 (en) | Total value bidding | |
JP2001331691A (en) | Bidding system using internet, market price prediction system, optimum bit quantity and price laying system, strategy laying system, and bidding system with risk management |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |